- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06691087
Sound Perception Study of Hearing-impaired People With Hearing Aids (ETERNEL)
ÉTude de la pERception soNorE de Personnes maLentendantes équipées d'Aides Auditives
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Céline Quinsac
- Phone Number: +33 0176535029
- Email: celine.quinsac@pasteur.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Armand Schwarz
- Email: armand.schwarz@pasteur.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Paris, France
- Recruiting
- CeRIAH
-
Contact:
- Paul Avan
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
For all participants:
- Age between 60 and 75
- Native French speaker
- Have given their consent to take part in the study.
- Declare that they have an active social life or hobbies that stimulate their cognitive abilities
- Have a MOCA score above 26
- No tympano-ossicular dysfunction.
- Voice in noise audiometry results showing normal results.
For participants with impaired hearing :
- Pure tone audiometry showing audiograms of type N3 or N4 and symmetrical between the two ears.
- Report having experienced problems with abnormally prominent sound.
For participants with normal hearing:
- Pure tone audiometry showing audiograms with losses of less than 30 dBHl.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Be under guardianship or curatorship,
- Be deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, or be under legal protection.
- Bear the consequences of an ear infection and/or have a history of an ENT disease that permanently affects hearing or balance (vestibular schwannoma, Ménière's disease, sudden or fluctuating deafness, congenital hypoacusis).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Normal Hearing participants
|
The experiment consists of evaluating the sound level of n complex stimuli, then equalising them in loudness, in order to measure a loudness curve in function of timbre descriptors. The stimuli will then be listened to again in pairs. The task is there to compare the stimuli using a VAS to indicate how different the two sounds are.
The experiment consists in identifying the parameters of the sound timbre that most disturb the understanding of complex sound scenes, by asking the participants to identify sounds whose timbre has been modified.
|
|
Experimental: Hearing-impaired with hearing aids
|
The experiment consists of evaluating the sound level of n complex stimuli, then equalising them in loudness, in order to measure a loudness curve in function of timbre descriptors. The stimuli will then be listened to again in pairs. The task is there to compare the stimuli using a VAS to indicate how different the two sounds are.
The experiment consists in identifying the parameters of the sound timbre that most disturb the understanding of complex sound scenes, by asking the participants to identify sounds whose timbre has been modified.
The experiment will be identical to intervention 2. This time, the modification of the stimulus timbres will focus on the most problematic dimensional modifications, i.e. those where the difference between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners is greatest.
We will then modify the signal processing parameters of the hearing aid simulator (for example, the size of the averaging window or the gain balance of the filters), to observe their impact on the salience of certain stimuli.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Percentage of correct answers in melody comparison tasks in the hearing-impaired group compared with the normal-hearing group,
Time Frame: 3-hours
|
3-hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Characterisation of the dissimilarity between pairs of stimuli measured by a continuous perceptual scale
Time Frame: 3-hours
|
Continuous perceptual scale ranging from very dissimilar to very similar
|
3-hours
|
|
Evaluation of the perceived loudness level of a set of stimuli, measured using scales of magnitude.
Time Frame: 3-hours
|
11-point Likert scale
|
3-hours
|
|
Comparison between the results of speech audiometry in noise, i.e number of words correctly repeated, with native settings versus settings minimising the discomfort of salient sounds for each participant with hearing loss.
Time Frame: up to 24 months
|
the comparison will focus on the number of words correctly repeated on the 1st visit (with native settings) versus the last visit (with settings minimising the discomfort)
|
up to 24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Paul Avan, CeRIAH
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-040
- 2024-A01112-45 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Auditory Perception
-
University of Massachusetts, AmherstCompleted
-
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and...Completed
-
Institut PasteurInstitut de l'AuditionRecruitingAuditory PerceptionBelgium, France
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedAuditory Perception | PsychoacousticsBrazil
-
Clarkson UniversityRecruiting
-
Aretaieion University HospitalRecruitingStress | Anesthesia | Music | Auditory PerceptionGreece
-
Hôpital le VinatierNot yet recruiting
-
Hôpital le VinatierRecruitingBasic Auditory Processes | Emotional Perception | Source Monitoring DeficitsFrance
-
Aaron NewmanTerminatedHearing Loss | Deafness and Auditory PerceptionCanada
-
Toronto Metropolitan UniversityMitacs; Sonova AGTerminatedAging | Hearing Loss | Music Therapy | Auditory PerceptionCanada
Clinical Trials on Influence of the parameters of the sound timbre on the perception of a sound
-
Iacob Czihac Emergency Military Clinical HospitalCompleted
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsTerminatedAmblyopiaUnited States, Australia, Canada
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityCompletedUrinary Retention PostoperativeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University Hospital, BrestRecruitingHabituation, Psychophysiological | Preterm, InfantFrance
-
Özlem CanbolatCompletedAnxiety | Music Intervention | Comfort | Coronary Angiography | Hemodynamic ParametersTurkey
-
Sonova AGSwiss Commission for Technology and InnovationCompletedAbility, SpatialSwitzerland
-
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip FakultesiCompletedNursing Caries | PretermTurkey
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleActive, not recruiting
-
Center for Sleep Medicine - Clinique André RenardPIRON Alain, Osteopath - physiotherapist; LACROIX Alain, neurologist, MD, PhD; CHAKAR Bassam, neurologist, MD, PhDCompletedObstructive Sleep Apnea | OSABelgium
-
University of ZurichCompleted