- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03704142
Comparison of PSAPs in Different Maskers
February 28, 2022 updated by: Karen Helfer, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Personal Amplification Devices in Noise and Speech Maskers
This study will measure the performance of three personal amplification devices when used by middle-aged adults.
Speech understanding will be assessed with two different types of background noises at three different input levels.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Speech understanding will be measured both unaided and aided with three different models of Personal Amplification devices (PSAPs).
Sentences will be played to the participant from a loudspeaker located in front.
Different types of background sounds (noise and other sentences) will be played from loudspeakers located to the right and left of the participant.
Participants will be instructed to repeat back the sentence coming from the front.
They also will rate subjective effort at the end of each block of trials.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
48
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Amherst, Massachusetts, United States, 01003
- University of Massachusetts Amherst
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
45 years to 64 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- mild high-frequency hearing loss (pure-tone thresholds of 25 decibels hearing loss - 45 decibels hearing loss between 2000 Hz and 6000 Hz)
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of prior hearing aid use
- history of neurologic or otologic disorders
- score of < 26 on Montreal Cognitive Assessment (cognitive screening tool)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Tweak Focus
Speech understanding and listening effort will be assessed using the Tweak Focus personal sound amplifiers.
|
Participants will be tested using the Tweak Focus hearing devices.
|
Experimental: IQ Earbuds
Speech understanding and listening effort will be assessed using the IQEarbuds personal sound amplifiers.
|
Participants will be tested using the IQ Earbuds hearing devices.
|
Experimental: Sound World Solutions CS50+
Speech understanding and listening effort will be assessed using the Sound World Solutions CS50+ personal sound amplifiers.
|
Participants will be tested using the Sound World Solutions CS 50+ hearing devices.
|
Experimental: Bose Hearphones
Speech understanding and listening effort will be assessed using the Sound World Solutions CS50+ personal sound amplifiers.
|
Participants will be tested using the Bose Hearphones hearing devices.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Comparison of How Four Models of Personal Listening Devices Improve Word Understanding in Noise
Time Frame: One 2-hour lab session
|
Improvement in performance on speech perception task using the Nuheara IQ Buds, Tweak Focus, Bose Hearphones, or the Sound World Solutions CS 50+ personal listening devices, measured by percentage of words accurately recalled in noise with device minus percentage recalled without device.
Positive values indicate improvement in performance.
|
One 2-hour lab session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference in Self-rated Listening Effort
Time Frame: One 2-hour session
|
Effect of listening devices on subjective listening effort, measured by rating on ten-point scale (10 = greatest amount of effort) after task performed with device minus rating after task performed without device.
Lower scores indicate less listening effort; negative values indicate reduction in effort with device.
|
One 2-hour session
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 1, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 30, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
March 30, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 9, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
October 12, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 17, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 28, 2022
Last Verified
February 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- UMassAmherst
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Auditory Perception
-
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and...Completed
-
Institut PasteurInstitut de l'AuditionNot yet recruitingAuditory PerceptionBelgium, France
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedAuditory Perception | PsychoacousticsBrazil
-
Clarkson UniversityRecruiting
-
Aretaieion University HospitalRecruitingStress | Anesthesia | Music | Auditory PerceptionGreece
-
Hôpital le VinatierRecruitingBasic Auditory Processes | Emotional Perception | Source Monitoring DeficitsFrance
-
Aaron NewmanTerminatedHearing Loss | Deafness and Auditory PerceptionCanada
-
Ryerson UniversityMitacs; Sonova AGTerminatedAging | Hearing Loss | Music Therapy | Auditory PerceptionCanada
-
Portland VA Medical CenterCompletedHearing Impairment | Memory | Auditory PerceptionUnited States
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceUnknownSchizophrenia | Auditory Hallucination | Visual Hallucination | False Perception
Clinical Trials on Tweak Focus
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonRecruitingEmotions | Psychological Stress | Physiological StressUnited States
-
University of MichiganNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Wayne State University; Barbara Ann Karmanos... and other collaboratorsCompletedBreast Cancer | Colorectal Cancer | Lung Cancer | Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Nantes University HospitalUnknown
-
BiogenCompleted
-
Federal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreCompletedMuscle Weakness | Muscle Weakness Condition | Neck; AnomalyBrazil
-
Queen's University, BelfastCompletedAge Related Macular DegenerationUnited Kingdom
-
Kirsehir Ahi Evran UniversitesiCompletedPhysical Therapy TechniquesTurkey
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityRecruitingStroke | HemiparesisUnited States