- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06268275
Comparison of Effects of Scalp Block and Intravenous Esmolol on Hemodynamic Response Following the Skull Pins Application for Elective Supratentorial Craniotomy
February 13, 2024 updated by: Akkhara Olanvoravuth, Khon Kaen University
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare hemodynamic response (MAP, SBP, DBP and HR) between scalp block and intravenous esmolol while skull pins application in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
90
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Naimuang, Muang
-
Khon Kaen, Naimuang, Muang, Thailand, 40002
- Khon Kaen University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-65 years old
- BMI 18-30 kg/m2
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-III
- Elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia
- Required application of skull pins
Exclusion Criteria:
- Poor controlled hypertensive condition (Baseline BP ≥ 160/110 mmHg)
- Thrombocytopenia / Coagulopathy
- Preoperative atrioventricular block (More than 2nd degree AV block)
- Emergency surgery
- Posterior fossa / Intracranial aneurysm surgery
- Pregnancy
- Chronic use of pain control
- Contraindication to beta-blockers
- Allergy to the drugs used in the study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group S
Receive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1% lidocaine (1:1) with adrenaline 1:200,000 infiltration for 10 minutes before skull pins application.
|
Receive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1% lidocaine (1:1) with adrenaline 1:200,000 infiltration for 10 minutes before skull pins application.
|
Active Comparator: Group E
Receive intravenous esmolol 1 mg/kg bolus over 1 minute before skull pins application.
|
Receive Intravenous esmolol 1 mg/kg bolus over 1 minute before skull pins application
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
MAP
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
|
Mean arterial pressure
|
Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
|
SBP
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
|
Systolic blood pressure
|
Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
|
DBP
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
|
Diastolic blood pressure
|
Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
|
HR
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
|
Heart rate
|
Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
BIS
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
|
Bispectral index
|
Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
|
Cumulative postoperative opioids consumption
Time Frame: 6 hours and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Opioids consumption
|
6 hours and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Postoperative adverse events
Time Frame: Within first 24 hours postoperatively
|
Incidence (%)
|
Within first 24 hours postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Gelineau AM, King MR, Ladha KS, Burns SM, Houle T, Anderson TA. Intraoperative Esmolol as an Adjunct for Perioperative Opioid and Postoperative Pain Reduction: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression. Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):1035-1049. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002469.
- Watts R, Thiruvenkatarajan V, Calvert M, Newcombe G, van Wijk RM. The effect of perioperative esmolol on early postoperative pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Mar;33(1):28-39. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.202182.
- Agarwal A, Sinha PK, Pandey CM, Gaur A, Pandey CK, Kaushik S. Effect of a subanesthetic dose of intravenous ketamine and/or local anesthetic infiltration on hemodynamic responses to skull-pin placement: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2001 Jul;13(3):189-94. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200107000-00002.
- Geze S, Yilmaz AA, Tuzuner F. The effect of scalp block and local infiltration on the haemodynamic and stress response to skull-pin placement for craniotomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Apr;26(4):298-303. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831aedb2.
- Bharne S, Bidkar PU, Badhe AS, Parida S, Ramesh AS. Comparison of intravenous labetalol and bupivacaine scalp block on the hemodynamic and entropy changes following skull pin application: A randomized, open label clinical trial. Asian J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan-Mar;11(1):60-5. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.165801.
- Fukuda S, Warner DS. Cerebral protection. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jul;99(1):10-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem140.
- Li J, Gelb AW, Flexman AM, Ji F, Meng L. Definition, evaluation, and management of brain relaxation during craniotomy. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):759-69. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew096. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
- Colley PS. Blunting the hemodynamic response to skull-pin placement. Anesth Analg. 1997 Apr;84(4):942. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199704000-00056. No abstract available.
- Singh G, Arimanikam G, Lionel KR, Smita V, Yadav B, Arulvelan A, et al. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Infusion versus Scalp Block with 0.5% Ropivacaine to Attenuate Hemodynamic Response to Skull Pin Insertion in Craniotomy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Neuroanaesth Crit Care. 2021 Sep;08(03):180-6.
- Yang SH, Liu R. Cerebral Autoregulation. In: Primer on Cerebrovascular Diseases [Internet]. Elsevier; 2017 [cited 2022 Jun 10]. p. 57-60.
- Jellish WS, Theard MA, Cheng MA, Leonetti JP, Crowder CM, Tempelhoff R. The effects of clonidine premedication and scalp infiltration of lidocaine on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and skull pin head-holder insertion during skull base procedures. Skull Base. 2001 Aug;11(3):169-76. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16605.
- Misra S, Koshy T, Unnikrishnan KP, Suneel PR, Chatterjee N. Gabapentin premedication decreases the hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion in patients undergoing craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011 Apr;23(2):110-7. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181da3c3b.
- Koo CH, Jeon S, Kim J, Ryu JH. The effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic response in patients undergoing skull-pin head-holder application during neurosurgery - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Aug;195:105939. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105939. Epub 2020 May 20.
- Doblar DD, Lim YC, Baykan N, Frenette L. A comparison of alfentanil, esmolol, lidocaine, and thiopental sodium on the hemodynamic response to insertion of headrest skull pins. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Feb;8(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00169-7.
- Altaf I, Banday J, Naaz S, Ozair E, Punetha P, Challam K. A randomized control trial on comparative effect of scalp nerve block using levobupivacaine versus fentanyl on the attenuation of pain and hemodynamic response to pin fixation. Bali J Anesthesiol. 2021;5(2):66.
- Yang X, Ma J, Li K, Chen L, Dong R, Lu Y, Zhang Z, Peng M. A comparison of effects of scalp nerve block and local anesthetic infiltration on inflammatory response, hemodynamic response, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebral aneurysms: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun 1;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0760-4.
- Hagan KB, Bhavsar S, Raza SM, Arnold B, Arunkumar R, Dang A, Gottumukkala V, Popat K, Pratt G, Rahlfs T, Cata JP. Enhanced recovery after surgery for oncological craniotomies. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Feb;24:10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
- Morais VBD, Sakata RK, Huang APS, Ferraro LHDC. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the analgesic effect of intraoperative esmolol for laparoscopic gastroplasty. Acta Cir Bras. 2020 Jun 5;35(4):e202000408. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020200040000008. eCollection 2020.
- Kang JK, Yoo SH, Chung JH, Kim NS, Jung HS, Seo YH, Chun HR, Gong HY, Son HD, Kim AJ. Dosing study of esmolol for reducing hemodynamic changes during lightwand intubation. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020 Oct 30;15(4):417-423. doi: 10.17085/apm.19067.
- Sola C, Dadure C, Choquet O, Capdevila X. Nerve Blocks of The Face. NYSORA [Internet]. 2018 Sep 17 [cited 2022 Jun 10]; Available from: https://www.nysora.com/techniques/head-and-neck-blocks/nerve-blocks-face/
- Hockey B, Leslie K, Williams D. Dexamethasone for intracranial neurosurgery and anaesthesia. J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Nov;16(11):1389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
- Uribe AA, Stoicea N, Echeverria-Villalobos M, Todeschini AB, Esparza Gutierrez A, Folea AR, Bergese SD. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Craniotomy: An Evidence-based Review of General Considerations, Risk Factors, and Management. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul 1;33(3):212-220. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000667.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 19, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
February 13, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 13, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
February 20, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 20, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 13, 2024
Last Verified
February 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HE651314
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
All collected individual participant data (IPD)
IPD Sharing Time Frame
6 months after publication
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers who required more information for further study
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hemodynamic Instability
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingHemodynamic InstabilityEgypt
-
Johannes Gutenberg University MainzRecruitingHemodynamic InstabilityGermany
-
Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi Institute of CardiologyRecruitingHemodynamic InstabilityPakistan
-
University of MonastirCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedHemodynamic InstabilityCanada
-
Inonu UniversityCompletedHemodynamic InstabilityTurkey
-
Muhammad Haroon AnwarPakistan Institute of Medical SciencesRecruiting
-
Sykehuset TelemarkUniversity of Oslo; Oslo University HospitalCompleted
Clinical Trials on Scalp block
-
University of Roma La SapienzaUnknownSupratentorial Neoplasms
-
University of LiegeUnknown
-
Chiang Mai UniversityUnknown
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedPostoperative Nausea and VomitingEgypt
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityRecruiting
-
George Papanicolaou HospitalUnknown
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Completed
-
Shaanxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineUnknown
-
Chiang Mai UniversityCompleted