The Relationship Between Emotion Regulation and Psychiatric Disorder in Youth

March 25, 2024 updated by: Tzu-Yu Liu, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

The Relationship Between Emotion Regulation and Psychiatric Disorder in Youth - From a Psychosocial Developmental Aspect.

According to the increasing worldwide prevalence rate of psychiatric disorders in youth, the mental health of youth is becoming more and more important.

Taiwan's Ministry of Health and Welfare reported the clibing suicide rate of youth in past five years and showed the prevention work and related intervention for youth's mental health was noteable. The definition of emotion regulation was "consists of the extrinsic and intrinsic processes responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and modifying emotional reactions, especially their intensive and temporal features, to accomplish one's goals." Emotion regulation strategies including "rumination", "avoidance", "suppression", "Problem-solving", "reappraisal", "acceptance", "social support", and "distraction".

Previous studies had examined the relationship between emotion regulation and mental health in youth; maladaptive emotion regulation would increase the individual's depressive and anxiety symptoms. Carstensen proposed social emotion theory in 1995 Selectivity theory (SST) refers to the need for emotion regulation, which activates Social participation in late adulthood. SST assumes that young people are more interested in social interaction behaviors related to information seeking and building self-concept. characteristics of youth affected by many normative challenges such as adolescence, school transitions, and more complex social Landscape; Adaptive emotion regulation will reduce risk of clinical emotion attacks of illness, especially depression and anxiety.To explore the relationship between emotion regulation and mental health from a psychosocial developmental aspect, we focused on the interaction between individual and environment. Compared with the previous generation, most youths of this generation were participating in social activities and building up interpersonal relationships through the internet, suggesting the internet was an important social context.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Keelung, Taiwan, 204
        • Recruiting
        • Chang-Geng Medical Foundation Chang-Geng Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Use the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) to assess subjective emotion regulation patterns in community healthy young people's emotion regulation experiences and expressions, and measure personal emotion regulation patterns related to mental health.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The inclusion criteria for the control group are as follows: (1) Understanding the content of the questionnaire. (2) Healthy adolescents aged 15 to less than 18 years and healthy adults aged 18 to 24 years.

The inclusion criteria for the experimental group are:

  1. Understanding the content of the questionnaire.
  2. Adolescents aged 15 to less than 18 years and adults aged 18 to 24 years.
  3. Diagnosed with major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or adjustment disorder according to DSM-5.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria for the experimental group are diagnoses of:

    1. organic brain injury
    2. schizophrenia
    3. autism spectrum disorder according to DSM-5.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
control
(1) Understanding the content of the questionnaire. (2) Healthy adolescents aged 15 to less than 18 years and healthy adults aged 18 to 24 years.
experimental
(1) Understanding the content of the questionnaire. (2) Adolescents aged 15 to less than 18 years and adults aged 18 to 24 years. (3) Diagnosed with major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or adjustment disorder according to DSM-5.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Difference and Similarity in Emotional Regulation Strategy Patterns between Western and Eastern Countries.
Time Frame: Each respondent interviews and fills out questionnaires, which takes about 20minutes.

To examine the cultural difference in emotion regulation strategies, we applied CERQ(Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire) to measure the cognitive regulation pattern of the Taiwanese and compared it with research articles that reported the CERQ results in six European countries and China.

Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). The CERQ includes nine positive/negative adaptive emotion regulation strategies: self-blame, rumination, Blaming others, catastrophizing, acceptance, positive refocusing, refocus on planning, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective ), each strategy subscale contains 4 questions, a total of 36 questions, and is answered in the form of a five-point scale. Subjects describe each question and circle the options that are consistent with their own situation (never, rarely, sometimes , often, always), each item ranges from 1 "never" to 5 "always", one point per question, no reverse questions.

Each respondent interviews and fills out questionnaires, which takes about 20minutes.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 26, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 26, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

3
Subscribe