Dexmedetomidine Compared to Ondansetron for Postanaesthetic Shivering in Patients Undergoing a Cesarean Section

February 26, 2024 updated by: MARIO AURELIO MARTÍNEZ-JIMÉNEZ, Hospital Central "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto"

Dexmedetomidine Compared With Ondansetron in Treating Postanesthetic Shivering in Patients After Regional Anesthesia for Cesarean Section-a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Evaluate the efficiency of management with intravenous dexmedetomidine compared to intravenous ondansetron to achieve the disappearance of post-anesthetic shivering in a shorter time in the obstetric patient undergoing cesarean section under regional anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Randomized clinical trial with 40 pregnant patients, between 18 and 45 years old with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) II or III, undergoing scheduled or emergency cesarean section with regional anesthesia and who presented grade tremor 1 based on the BSAS (Bedside shivering assessment scale) scale, at the Hospital Central from San Luis Potosi, Mexico. The main objective of this study was to quantify the time that elapsed from the end of the administration of the medication until the disappearance of the tremor, which was measured in minutes; The evaluation of the disappearance, persistence or reappearance of the tremor was solely visual by the anesthesiology staff.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • San Luis Potosí, Mexico, 78290
        • Hospital Central Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA II or III, undergoing scheduled or emergency cesarean section with regional anesthesia (hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with morphine at 1 mcg Kg-1) and who presented tremor grade >1 based on the BSAS scale

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamic instability, heart disease or sinus bradycardia, allergy to any of the medications applied, psychiatric diseases or hypothermia <35.2 ºC measured by tympanic temperature.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dexmedetomidine
0.3 mcg Kg-1 (actual weight) of dexmedetomidine IV in 20 mL of saline
20 mL of saline
Other Names:
  • isotonic solution
Sham Comparator: Ondansetron
8 mg ondansetron IV in 20 mL saline
20 mL of saline
Other Names:
  • isotonic solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Period of time
Time Frame: one hour
period of time in which post-anesthetic tremor is controlled from the moment of administration
one hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effects
Time Frame: one hour
To measure the frequencies of occurrence of adverse effects and changes in vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, and temperature [measured at the tympanic membrane]) correlated with resolution of tremor.
one hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: MARIO A MARTÍNEZ-JIMÉNEZ, Dr., Hospital Central "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto"

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 5, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

It might be useful for other researchers to expand their investigations, nevertheless, in this moment it seems completed this branch of investigation.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section

Clinical Trials on saline solution

3
Subscribe