Comparison Between Different Techniques in Difficult CBD Cannulation

March 12, 2024 updated by: Ahmed El Said Salam, Menoufia University

Comparative Study Between Double Guide Wire Technique Versus Trans Pancreatic Sphincterotomy Versus Precut and Fistulotomy Techniques for Difficult Biliary Cannulation

This study aims to compare the efficacy and outcomes between double guidewire technique (DGT), trans pancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS) as well as precut and fistulotomy techniques in ERCP in patients defined as having difficult biliary cannulation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard procedure for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for pancreatobiliary diseases. Bile duct cannulation is the most basic and important technique for carrying out diagnostic and therapeutic biliary interventions.

Since the advent of ERCP selective cannulation of the biliary duct is the most important step for successful treatment of biliary tract diseases during ERCP procedures, despite various accessory devices, the standard biliary cannulation technique has been reported to fail in approximately 5-20% cases.

Various endoscopic techniques for Selective Bile duct cannulation have been reported, including standard techniques (e.g. contrast injection technique, wire-guided cannulation ), pancreatic guidewire technique (e.g. double guidewire technique [DGW]), precut sphincterotomy, endoscopic papillectomy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous procedure, and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage-guided procedure.

Bile duct cannulation can be difficult because of; different anatomical features, inflammatory processes, and adenomas of the papilla or periampullary diverticulum. Large prospective studies have demonstrated that difficult cannulation is an independent risk factor for post ERCP pancreatitis.

As the technique developed, several supplementary techniques have been recommended to facilitate the access to the common bile duct in cases of standard biliary cannulation failure, these are known to significantly increase not only the success rate of selective biliary cannulation but also the complication rate .

Commonly, a precutting technique is used to allow biliary access when the standard cannulation technique failed. There are types of precutting technique: needle-knife papillotomy, suprapapillary fistulotomy and trans pancreatic sphincterotomy, in terms of effectiveness and efficiency of the precutting technique, TPS, which does not need avoiding pancreatic duct cannulation unintentionally, is an effective method especially for difficult biliary cannulation.

Also, the use of a guidewire to physically occupy the pancreatic duct, also known as the double guidewire technique, this method has been used with promising results in cases of complex biliary cannulation, especially in patients with a distorted BD anatomy caused by neoplasia or atypical morphology of the ampulla.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Menofia
      • Shibīn Al Kawm, Menofia, Egypt, 32951
        • National Liver Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having different biliary tract disorders for which ERCP is indicated and after which they defined as having difficult CBD cannulation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age of less than18 years.
  2. Coagulopathy in terms of INR>2.
  3. Patients with severe heart disease defined as patients with decompensated heart diseases or EF > 40%.
  4. Subjects who underwent prior biliary or pancreatic sphincterotomy or dilatation or stenting of either duct.
  5. Complicated acute pancreatitis defined as patients with moderate to sever acute pancreatitis according to Revised ATLANTA criteria 2012.
  6. Pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Patients enrolled for double guide wire technique.
comparison between different technique in difficult CBD cannulation
Active Comparator: Patients enrolled for trans - pancreatic sphincterotomy technique.
comparison between different technique in difficult CBD cannulation
Active Comparator: Patients enrolled for needle knife precut technique or fistulotomy technique.
comparison between different technique in difficult CBD cannulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparative Study Between Different Interventional Techniques for Difficult Common Bile Duct Cannulation In Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-pancreatography
Time Frame: Baseline
compare efficacy of different cannulation techniques for difficult CBD cannulation
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 19, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Difficult CBD cannulation

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ERCP, Difficult CBD Cannulation

3
Subscribe