A Head-to-head Study Comparing the Functional Value of Two Models of Robotically Assisted Rehabilitation in SMA (Spinal Muscular Atrophy) Patients (SMArt)

A Head-to-head Study Comparing the Functional Value of Two Models of Robotically Assisted Rehabilitation in SMA Patients: Single-center, Randomized, Single-blinded, Comparative Study of a Robotically Active Verticalization Model Versus Robotically Assisted Locomotion Model

A head-to-head study comparing the functional value of two models of robotically assisted rehabilitation in patients with SMA. A single-center, randomized, single-blinded, comparative study of Robotically Assisted Verticalization versus Robotically Assisted Locomotion.

The objective of research:

The main goal of the project is to determine the optimal robotically assisted rehabilitation model for people with SMA depending on age and baseline functional status. The study consists of a head-to-head comparison of two rehabilitation models.

  1. Research period: 4 years
  2. Patients age: 0-21 y.o.
  3. Group size: 200 patients (100 patients in each group)
  4. Assignment of patients to study groups in a randomised manner

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Marek Jóźwiak
  • Phone Number: +48 696052475
  • Email: sma@orsk.pl

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Radosław Rutkowski
  • Phone Number: 696052475
  • Email: sma@orsk.pl

Study Locations

      • Poznań, Poland, 61-545
        • Recruiting
        • Wiktor Dega University Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Marek Jóźwiak
          • Phone Number: +48 696052475
          • Email: sma@orsk.pl
        • Contact:
          • Radosław Rutkowski
          • Phone Number: 696052475
          • Email: sma@orsk.pl

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signing of informed consent to participate in the experiment by the participant or the participant's parent/legal guardian
  • Diagnosis of SMA (spinal muscular atrophy 1-4) confirmed by genetic testing, symptomatic or pre-symptomatic
  • Age between 0 and 21 years of age (will be determined on the day of starting participation in the project based on the date of birth)
  • Treatment under a drug program for spinal muscular atrophy, provided that the patient has a diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy at the date of eligibility.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardio-respiratory disorders requiring invasive ventilation
  • Advanced osteoporosis with multiple fractures prior to treatment
  • Functional deterioration during the rehabilitation process in the range of scales appropriately selected for the SMA type: Prechtl, HINE, CHOP-INTEND, HFMS, RULM
  • Lack of cooperation with the therapist
  • Other functional indications preventing exercise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Robotically Assisted Locomotion
  • Motor control training
  • Locomotion and motor control training with elements of balance and coordination
  • Verticalization training: standing frame device and vibration platform
  • Cognitive therapy
Active Comparator: Robotically Assisted Verticalization
  • Motor control training
  • Verticalization training with Standard Frame Devices
  • Locomotion and motor control training with elements of balance and coordination
  • Cognitive therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical assessment of patients using Children's Hospital Of Philadelphia Infant Test Of Neuromuscular Disorders, Revised Upper Limb Module, Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Clinical assessment of patients using Balance test minimum 1 min., Self-walk test of at least 2 meters, 6-minute gait test, Up&Go test, 10 meters gait test, hip range of motion and muscle strength evaluation.
Time Frame: Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Functional assessment of patients using GMFM (Gross Motor Function Measure) scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
X-ray or ultrasound scan imaging assessment of the spine, hip joints and bone mineral density
Time Frame: Once per 1 year
Once per 1 year
Assessment of the quality of life of patients and their caregivers using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory ver. 4.0
Time Frame: Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Hospitalization during or between rehabilitations that take place each 6 months
Time Frame: Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year
Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year
Occurence of discomfort during therapy requiring abrupt interruption or significant modification
Time Frame: Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Number of fractures
Time Frame: Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year
Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marek Jóźwiak, Wiktor Dega University Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SMA

Clinical Trials on Robotically Assisted Locomotion

Subscribe