A RCT to Compare the Effectiveness of Nebulized Anticholinergics for Cough Suppression During Flexible Bronchoscopy (NAFCOF)

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Nebulized Anticholinergics for Cough Suppression During Flexible Bronchoscopy

No study has examined the role of inhaled glycopyrrolate on mucus secretion. We hypothesize that nebulized glycopyrrolate will improve bronchoscopy procedure by effectively suppressing airway mucus secretion, thereby decreasing cough, and thus improving patient comfort during bronchoscopy. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy of nebulized glycopyrrolate versus nebulized ipratropium in suppression of cough during flexible bronchoscopy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Bronchoscopy is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for direct visualization of airways, with diagnostic and therapeutic intent. In 1897, Killian laid the foundation of bronchoscopy by extracting an animal bone from the right main bronchus of a farmer using rigid esophagoscope. In 1966, Shigeto Ikeda developed a prototype of flexible bronchoscope. Since its inception, flexible bronchoscope has undergone advancements in design and technology. The technological advancements in the recent decades have improved diagnostic yield and safety, with low morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, the occurrence of cough during flexible bronchoscopy makes the procedure difficult and increases procedure time with patient discomfort.

Owing to the lack of clinical benefits and possible hemodynamic changes, the British Thoracic Society and Joint Indian Chest Society recommend not to use anticholinergic premedication via the parenteral route for preventing cough before bronchoscopy.

bronchoscopy. A few studies have evaluated inhaled anticholinergic premedication. Inoue et al. (in 1994) studied the effects of inhaled ipratropium bromide on bronchoconstriction in 29 subjects underwent for diagnostic bronchoscopy. They concluded that ipratropium protects against the deleterious effects resulting from topical lidocaine anesthesia during bronchoscopy. Wang et al. evaluated the efficacy of ipratropium bromide in 250 patients in a placebo-controlled trial. They reported that nebulized ipratropium bromide could reduce airway secretions and patient discomfort.

To our knowledge, no study has examined the role of inhaled glycopyrrolate on mucus secretion. We hypothesize that nebulized glycopyrrolate will improve bronchoscopy procedure by effectively suppressing airway mucus secretion, thereby decreasing cough, and thus improving patient comfort during bronchoscopy.

In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy of nebulized glycopyrrolate versus nebulized ipratropium in suppression of cough during flexible bronchoscopy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1050

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • Bronchoscopy suite, PGIMER

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Consecutive patients with indication for flexible bronchoscopy will be enrolled in the study if they meet all the following criteria:

  • age ≥18 years
  • hemodynamically stable
  • willing to provide a written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria: Patients with any of the following will be excluded:

  • intubated or tracheostomized patients
  • patients with airway stent in situ
  • patients with a history of glaucoma
  • baseline oxygen saturation <90%
  • patients with hemodynamic instability (SBP <90 mm Hg)
  • patients undergoing sedation for bronchoscopy
  • failure to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Glycopyrronium
Nebulized glycopyrronium 50 mcg (2 ml) administered via a jet nebulizer over 10 minutes
Nebulized glycopyrronium 50 mcg
Active Comparator: Ipratropium
Nebulized ipratropium bromide 500 mcg (2 ml) administered via a jet nebulizer over 10 minutes
Nebulized iptratropium 500 mcg
Placebo Comparator: Saline
Nebulized saline 0.9% (2 ml) administered via a jet nebulizer over 10 minutes
0.9% saline 2 ml

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cough count
Time Frame: Intra-procedure
Objectively measured using condenser microphone and voice recording application though a smartphone
Intra-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operator-estimated airway secretion
Time Frame: Intra-procedure
Recorded as: almost none, needing saline to wash out, and excessive, making it difficult to visualize the airways and requires 5 ml aliquots of saline
Intra-procedure
Operator-rated secretions on a visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Immedidate post-procedure
100 mm VAS anchored as no secretion at one and maximal secretions at the other
Immedidate post-procedure
Operator-rated cough intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Immedidate post-procedure
100 mm VAS anchored as no cough at one and maximal cough at the other
Immedidate post-procedure
Patient-rated comfort on a visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Immedidate post-procedure
100 mm VAS anchored as maximal comfort at one and maximal discomfort at the other
Immedidate post-procedure
Adverse reactions
Time Frame: 1-hour post-procedure
Arrhythmia, glaucoma, nausea, headache
1-hour post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 25, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subjects Undergoing Flexible Bronchoscopy

Clinical Trials on Glycopyrronium

Subscribe