- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06404125
Investigation of the Effect of Central Sensitization Symptom Severity on Steroid Injection Results in Shoulder Pain
Investigation of the Effect of Pre-treatment Central Sensitization Severity on Steroid Injection Results in Rotator Cuff-induced Shoulder Pain
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the presence and severity of pre-treatment central sensitization on the results of subacromial/ intra-articular shoulder injection in patients with rotator cuff lesion/subacromial impingement. The hypothesis of the study is that the treatment response will decrease in patients with pre-injection central sensitization.
There are many studies investigating the frequency of central sensitization in various shoulder pathologies. However, the effect of this condition, which is likely to be associated with chronic pain in these patients, on treatment response is unknown. The effect on the results of shoulder injection, one of the most common procedures in physical therapy practice, will be investigated.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
- Diagnostic test: Range of Motion of Shoulde Joint
- Diagnostic test: Hand Grip Test
- Diagnostic test: Numeric Rating Scale
- Diagnostic test: Pain-Pressure Threshold Measurement With an Algometer
- Diagnostic test: Central Sensitization Scale
- Diagnostic test: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
- Diagnostic test: Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH)
- Diagnostic test: Short Form-36
Detailed Description
Shoulder pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal complaints and its prevalence varies between 7-26%. Although some of the patients with shoulder pain show complete recovery, pain persists in some of them. One of the most common sources of pain in these patients is subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) leading to rotator cuff pathology. The multifactorial nature of pain in these patients makes the treatment of SIS difficult.
Central sensitization (CS) has been reported as one of the factors associated with persistence of pain in patients with shoulder pain in different etiologies, especially in the SIS. CS can be summarized as an increase in the response of neurons located in the central nervous system to subthreshold stimuli and is the source of chronic pain in many diseases. A decrease in the pressure pain threshold was observed in the painful shoulder of 58 patients with experimental pain response in the shoulder.
In a meta-analysis of patients with shoulder pain, a decrease in pressure pain threshold was found in 29-77% of patients, while SS was found in 11-24% of patients. The authors emphasized the significant correlation of CS with poor treatment response. There is increasing evidence that CS negatively affects various pain treatment responses, including surgery. Considering the frequency of CS in patients with shoulder pain, it is likely to have a negative impact on treatment response in these patients as well. One of the most common treatments for SIS is subacromial/ intra-articular shoulder injection. Although several factors have been identified in the prediction of shoulder injection outcomes, the effect of pain sensitization on these procedures is not yet known.
This study was designed as a prospective single-center study. Patients aged 18-65 years with rotator cuff lesions lasting more than three months and presenting to our physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic will be included. Patients who have received medical treatment as part of routine practice and have not had an adequate response will be evaluated before and after injection. Injection preference will be determined according to the patient primary complaint and lesion and will be administered into the subacromial space or into the shoulder joint. There is no additional interventional procedure due to the study. Patients will be divided into 2 groups with and without central sensitization. A total of 18 patients were planned for each group. The study will be conducted between March 2023 and June 2024.
Within the scope of the study, age, gender, body mass index, marital status, education level and occupation of the participants will be recorded as demographic data. Clinical evaluation includes pain duration, treatments received, pain intensity (numeric pain scale 0-10), disease-related MRI/USG findings and the following evaluations.
All patients will be evaluated before injection, 1 week, 1 and 3 months after injection. Within the scope of evaluation, Central Sensitization Scale, Quick DASH, SF-36 and Hospital Anxiety and Depression questionnaire, pressure pain threshold, goniometric shoulder range of motion measurement, hand grip strength (with Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer), numeric pain scale (no pain: 0- unbearable pain: 10) and pain intensity will be recorded at each visit.
Data analysis will be performed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 23.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Üsküdar
-
Istanbul, Üsküdar, Turkey (Türkiye), 34674
- Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinically and radiographically confirmed rotator cuff pathology
- Being between the ages of 18-65
- Non-response to medical treatment
- Being literate
- To agree to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of shoulder trauma and previous shoulder surgery
- Injection in the shoulder area in the last 3 months
- History of active cancer, systemic inflammatory disease and infection
- Pregnancy
- Under 18 and over 65 years of age
- Illiteracy
- Refusal to participate in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Group 1 (Patients without central sensitization)
Patients with rotator cuff lesions lasting more than three months and without central sensitization will be included in group 1. (n=18)
|
Goniometric measurements will be made for both upper extremities.
Flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation angles of the shoulder complex will be evaluated in the measurement.
The purpose of this test is to test the maximum isometric contraction strength of the hand and forearm muscles.
A hand grip dynamometer (Jamar) will be used for the test.
While the patient is sitting in the chair, the elbows will be close to the body and at 90 degree flexion, the wrist will be in a neutral position.
The patient will be asked to grasp the dynamometer and squeeze it as hard as she can, and the average of 3 measurements made with an interval of 10 seconds.
The test will be repeated for both upper extremities separately.
Shoulder pain, feeling of tension and heaviness on the affected arm will be evaluated separately by numerical scale.
The measurement will be performed 2 times with 3 min intervals for each region and the average of these applications will be recorded. Before the test, a trial test will be applied to the patient. With the pressure algometer, pressure will be applied to the selected points until it causes pain and the test will be terminated for that region when the patient feels pain. The measurement includes bilateral shoulder region and left forearm as control region and Wagner manual pressure algometer (1 cm2 probe-10 kg/20 lb) will be used. The selected points will be:
The central sensitization scale was developed primarily to detect central sensitization findings in patients with chronic pain and consists of two parts, A and B. In part A, 25 somatic and psychosocial symptoms frequently found in patients with central sensitization are questioned.
In part B, the presence of diseases with a well-defined relationship with central sensitization is questioned without participating in the scoring.
Patients who score 40 points or more out of a total of 100 points are considered to have central sensitization.
Düzce et al. stated that the Central Sensitization Scale can be used as a valid method in the Turkish population to screen the presence of central sensitization in patients presenting with chronic pain.
This scale was developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983 to screen anxiety and depression in individuals with physical illness.
The scale consists of fourteen questions, seven for anxiety and seven for depression, to be answered on a four-point Likert scale.
The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale has been demonstrated and a score above ten for anxiety and seven for depression is considered significant.
The arm, shoulder and hand problems rapid questionnaire is a shortened version of a questionnaire designed to detect symptoms and loss of function secondary to musculoskeletal problems of the upper extremity.
The questionnaire will be used to assess quality of life related to upper extremity function.
The scale was developed by Ware in 1987 and consists of 36 questions in which 8 sub-parameters related to the health status of the person are questioned.
These parameters are physical function, pain, limitation due to physical and emotional problems, emotional well-being, social function, fatigue and general health perception.
The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was performed by Pınar et al.
It is one of the leading methods used in the evaluation of quality of life in our country as well as all over the world.
|
|
Group 2 (Patients with central sensitization)
patients with rotator cuff lesions lasting more than three months and central sensitization will be included in group 2. (n=18)
|
Goniometric measurements will be made for both upper extremities.
Flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation angles of the shoulder complex will be evaluated in the measurement.
The purpose of this test is to test the maximum isometric contraction strength of the hand and forearm muscles.
A hand grip dynamometer (Jamar) will be used for the test.
While the patient is sitting in the chair, the elbows will be close to the body and at 90 degree flexion, the wrist will be in a neutral position.
The patient will be asked to grasp the dynamometer and squeeze it as hard as she can, and the average of 3 measurements made with an interval of 10 seconds.
The test will be repeated for both upper extremities separately.
Shoulder pain, feeling of tension and heaviness on the affected arm will be evaluated separately by numerical scale.
The measurement will be performed 2 times with 3 min intervals for each region and the average of these applications will be recorded. Before the test, a trial test will be applied to the patient. With the pressure algometer, pressure will be applied to the selected points until it causes pain and the test will be terminated for that region when the patient feels pain. The measurement includes bilateral shoulder region and left forearm as control region and Wagner manual pressure algometer (1 cm2 probe-10 kg/20 lb) will be used. The selected points will be:
The central sensitization scale was developed primarily to detect central sensitization findings in patients with chronic pain and consists of two parts, A and B. In part A, 25 somatic and psychosocial symptoms frequently found in patients with central sensitization are questioned.
In part B, the presence of diseases with a well-defined relationship with central sensitization is questioned without participating in the scoring.
Patients who score 40 points or more out of a total of 100 points are considered to have central sensitization.
Düzce et al. stated that the Central Sensitization Scale can be used as a valid method in the Turkish population to screen the presence of central sensitization in patients presenting with chronic pain.
This scale was developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983 to screen anxiety and depression in individuals with physical illness.
The scale consists of fourteen questions, seven for anxiety and seven for depression, to be answered on a four-point Likert scale.
The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale has been demonstrated and a score above ten for anxiety and seven for depression is considered significant.
The arm, shoulder and hand problems rapid questionnaire is a shortened version of a questionnaire designed to detect symptoms and loss of function secondary to musculoskeletal problems of the upper extremity.
The questionnaire will be used to assess quality of life related to upper extremity function.
The scale was developed by Ware in 1987 and consists of 36 questions in which 8 sub-parameters related to the health status of the person are questioned.
These parameters are physical function, pain, limitation due to physical and emotional problems, emotional well-being, social function, fatigue and general health perception.
The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was performed by Pınar et al.
It is one of the leading methods used in the evaluation of quality of life in our country as well as all over the world.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Central Sensitization Scale
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The central sensitization scale was developed primarily to detect central sensitization findings in patients with chronic pain and consists of two parts, A and B. In part A, 25 somatic and psychosocial symptoms frequently found in patients with central sensitization are questioned.
In part B, the presence of diseases with a well-defined relationship with central sensitization is questioned without participating in the scoring.
Patients who score 40 points or more out of a total of 100 points are considered to have central sensitization.
Düzce et al. stated that the Central Sensitization Scale can be used as a valid method in the Turkish population to screen the presence of central sensitization in patients presenting with chronic pain.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Range of Motion of Shoulde Joint
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Goniometric measurements will be made for both upper extremities.
Flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation angles of the shoulder complex will be evaluated in the measurement.
|
12 months
|
|
Hand Grip Test
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The purpose of this test is to test the maximum isometric contraction strength of the hand and forearm muscles.
A hand grip dynamometer (Jamar) will be used for the test.
While the patient is sitting in the chair, the elbows will be close to the body and at 90 degree flexion, the wrist will be in a neutral position.
The patient will be asked to grasp the dynamometer and squeeze it as hard as she can, and the average of 3 measurements made with an interval of 10 seconds.
The test will be repeated for both upper extremities separately.
|
12 months
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Shoulder pain, feeling of tension and heaviness on the affected arm will be evaluated separately by numerical scale.
|
12 months
|
|
Pain-Pressure Threshold Measurement With an Algometer
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The measurement will be performed 2 times with 3 min intervals for each region and the average of these applications will be recorded.
Before the test, a trial test will be applied to the patient.
With the pressure algometer, pressure will be applied to the selected points until it causes pain and the test will be terminated for that region when the patient feels pain.
The measurement includes bilateral shoulder region and left forearm as control region and Wagner manual pressure algometer (1 cm2 probe-10 kg/20 lb) will be used.
The selected points will be: 1. Bilateral supraspinatus muscle: 1 cm cranial to the midpoint of the spina scapulae 2. Bilateral infraspinatus muscle: Medial edge of the scapula, intersection of the spina scapula and the inferior scapular angle 3. Bilateral upper trapezius muscle: MidN point of the line joining the acromion and C7 spinous process 4. Left forearm volar face center as control point
|
12 months
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: 12 months
|
This scale was developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983 to screen anxiety and depression in individuals with physical illness.
The scale consists of fourteen questions, seven for anxiety and seven for depression, to be answered on a four-point Likert scale.
The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale has been demonstrated and a score above ten for anxiety and seven for depression is considered significant.
|
12 months
|
|
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The arm, shoulder and hand problems rapid questionnaire is a shortened version of a questionnaire designed to detect symptoms and loss of function secondary to musculoskeletal problems of the upper extremity.
The questionnaire will be used to assess quality of life related to upper extremity function.
|
12 months
|
|
Short Form-36
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The scale was developed by Ware in 1987 and consists of 36 questions in which 8 sub-parameters related to the health status of the person are questioned.
These parameters are physical function, pain, limitation due to physical and emotional problems, emotional well-being, social function, fatigue and general health perception.
The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was performed by Pınar et al.
It is one of the leading methods used in the evaluation of quality of life in our country as well as all over the world.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Emre Ata, Ass. Prof., Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sanchis MN, Lluch E, Nijs J, Struyf F, Kangasperko M. The role of central sensitization in shoulder pain: A systematic literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Jun;44(6):710-6. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
- Coronado RA, Simon CB, Valencia C, George SZ. Experimental pain responses support peripheral and central sensitization in patients with unilateral shoulder pain. Clin J Pain. 2014 Feb;30(2):143-51. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318287a2a4.
- Previtali D, Bordoni V, Filardo G, Marchettini P, Guerra E, Candrian C. High Rate of Pain Sensitization in Musculoskeletal Shoulder Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2021 Mar 1;37(3):237-248. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000914.
- Walankar PP, Panhale VP, Patil MM. Psychosocial factors, disability and quality of life in chronic shoulder pain patients with central sensitization. Health Psychol Res. 2020 Oct 1;8(2):8874. doi: 10.4081/hpr.2020.8874. eCollection 2020 Oct 5.
- Duzce Keles E, Birtane M, Ekuklu G, Kilincer C, Caliyurt O, Tastekin N, Is EE, Ketenci A, Neblett R. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the central sensitization inventory. Arch Rheumatol. 2021 Oct 18;36(4):518-526. doi: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2022.8665. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23/20
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain
-
University Rovira i VirgiliMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación, SpainNot yet recruitingChronic Post-operative Pain | Chronic Postsurgical Pain | Chronic Post-surgical Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainSpain
-
Pain ConcernThe Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE) and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Chronic Pain, Widespread | Chronic Pain Due to Trauma | Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding) | Chronic Pain Due to Injury | Chronic Pain Post-Procedural | Chronic Pain HipUnited Kingdom
-
Bjorn AngKarolinska Institutet; The Swedish Research Council; Göteborg University; Forte; Dalarna...Not yet recruitingPain Management | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain, WidespreadSweden
-
University of FaisalabadNot yet recruiting
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCAPES Foundation - Ministry of Education, Brazil.Enrolling by invitationChronic Low Back Pain | Chronic Shoulder Pain | Chronic Knee PainBrazil
-
Washington D.C. Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Back Pain | Chronic Pain (back / Neck)United States
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionCompletedPain, Chronic | Widespread Chronic PainSweden
-
Connecticut Children's Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Pain | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...RecruitingJoint Pain | Chronic Knee Pain | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck) | Chronic Pain ManagementUnited States
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States
Clinical Trials on Range of Motion of Shoulde Joint
-
Pamukkale UniversityRecruiting
-
Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital...CompletedPain | Breast Cancer | Lymphedema | Myofascial Pain Syndrome | Breast Cancer Female | Lymphedema of Upper LimbTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Konya Beyhekim Training and Research HospitalNot yet recruitingTemporomandibular DysfunctionTurkey
-
University of VirginiaNational Athletic Trainers' Association Research & Education Foundation (NATA...TerminatedKnee Pain | Lumbopelvic Pain | Hip Pain | Ankle PainUnited States
-
Jakub BłaszczykActive, not recruitingKnee Arthritis, OsteoarthritisPoland
-
Jan Biziel University Hospital No 2 in BydgoszczCharles University, Czech Republic; University Hospital Kralovske VinohradyEnrolling by invitationKnee Arthritis OsteoarthritisPoland
-
Washington University School of MedicineNeurolutions, Inc.TerminatedHemiparesis | Chronic StrokeUnited States
-
NAİME ULUGCompletedChronic Kidney DiseasesTurkey
-
Baylor College of MedicineActive, not recruitingPatellar DislocationUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicWithdrawnCubital Tunnel Syndrome