Perineal Massage in Women With Gynecological Cancer

May 31, 2024 updated by: Prof. Dr. Daniel Pecos Martín, University of Alcala

Oncological Perineal Massage in Vaginal Stenosis and Dyspareunia in Women With Gynecological Cancer

The high incidence of gynecological cancers, together with dyspareunia and vaginal stenosis, some of its most frequent sequelae, create the need to continue studying and researching oncological physiotherapy techniques that treat and prevent these sequelae, in order to preserve and/or improve the quality of life of cancer patients. Therefore, through this study, we sought to verify the effectiveness of oncological perineal massage to treat pain during sexual intercourse and vaginal stenosis.

The objective of this study will be to demonstrate the effectiveness of a treatment that will consist of a health education session related to the pelvic floor and the consequences related to cancer along with ten sessions of oncological perineal massage that will be carried out for fifty minutes, once a week.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Tenerife
      • Santa cruz de Tenerife., Tenerife, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer en la provincia de Santa cruz de Tenerife.
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women between 18 and 52 years old
  • Oncology patients with a diagnosis of dyspareunia and vaginal stenosis related to treatments.
  • Patients with QT/RT/BT treatment who have a diagnosis of dyspareunia and vaginal stenosis.
  • Patients on hormonal suppressive treatment with a diagnosis of dyspareunia and vaginal stenosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not accept intracavitary treatment.
  • Patients with abdominopelvic surgical treatment prior to oncological process.
  • Patients with a diagnosis of dyspareunia prior to cancer.
  • Patients with vaginal narrowing prior to cancer.
  • Patients with menopause at the time of cancer diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Perineal massage
Ten sessions of perineal massage, which will be carried out for fifty minutes, once a week, together with a health education program.
The technique will be applied for approximately twenty minutes and will be carried out as follows: the vaginal dilator is introduced progressively using crescent-shaped movements. Once the dilator is fully inserted, movements will be made from bottom to top and from one side to the other, and then continue with the crescent-shaped movements.
Active Comparator: Treatment with dilators
A health education session will be held but then the use of vaginal dilators will be done according to the gold standard treatment.
The treatment will consist of the use of vaginal dilators according to the gold standard proposed in the literature. It will consist of introducing the same dilators as for the experimental group, with the same time schedule, but without massage, only introducing the dilator and keeping it in the vagina for 20 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain (Visual Analoge Scale)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at six months
Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, used to record patients' pain progression, or compare pain severity between patients with similar conditions. VAS is a straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 100 mm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured orientated from the left "0" (worst) to the right "10"(best)
Change from baseline at six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at six months
Grade refers to the severity of the Adverse Events. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on a general guideline where grade 1 and grade 5 are the best and worst result respectively.
Change from baseline at six months
Quality of life (EORCT QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at six months
The EORTC QLG Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-item instrument designed to measure quality of life in all cancer patients. The scores obtained can have values between 0 and 100, which determines the level of impact of the cancer on the patient of each of the scales. High values on the global health and function status scales indicate a better quality of life, while on the symptoms scale it would indicate a decrease in quality of life since it indicates the presence of symptoms associated with cancer.
Change from baseline at six months
Female sexual function index
Time Frame: Change from baseline at six months
Female sexual function index (FSFI) is a survey measuring the sexual functioning of women in six different domains: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain.The items are then scaled to achieve a maximum score of 36.
Change from baseline at six months
Likert questionnaire by sexual dysfunction
Time Frame: Change from baseline at six months
Likert scales are a structured way for researchers to gather diverse opinions and attitudes. They allow respondents to express agreement, disagreement, or neutrality concerning statements or questions. The scale values range from 1 to 5, with 1 being the worst result and 5 being the best result.
Change from baseline at six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Raquel Perez-García, Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer en la provincia de Santa cruz de Tenerife.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 31, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 3, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 3, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHUNSC_2023_104

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer Pain

Clinical Trials on Perineal massage

3
Subscribe