Metacognitive Intervention in Youth With Oncological Disease - the Mio Study (Mio)

November 25, 2025 updated by: Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

The aim of the Mio-Study is to address the current lack of effective treatment options to reduce cognitive and physical long-term problems in children and adolescents with cancer. Through the use of the Mio-App, cognitive and physical development will be strengthened and metacognitive thinking and awareness will increase.

The Mio-App for children and adolescence with cancer will include a combination of cognitive and physical training tasks and prospective as well as retrospective metacognitive questions. In a randomized controlled trial, the App will be analysed for its efficacy on metacognitive thinking and executive functions. In particular, the investigators are interested in factors that affect the efficacy of the training program such as compliance, age, sex or the presence of fatigue. This study will give insight into the role of metacognition in cognitive and physical performance and will foster the development of children and adolescents with cancer in the long-term.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In the Mio-Study, the investigators are developing a training app at the interface between neuropsychology and sports science - the Mio-training. The aim of the Mio-training is to strengthen the cognitive and motor development of children and adolescents after cancer in the long-term. The App contains a combination of cognitive and physical training tasks and metacognitive questions to promote knowledge and awareness of one's own thinking. In order to counteract the shortage of skilled workers and the increasing specialization of individual specialist areas, solutions are needed that can be implemented without a lot of staff. From today's perspective, there are hardly any trainings for children and adolescents that show long-term effects on cognitive and motor development and can also be transferred to non-trained tasks in school and everyday life.

The investigators are testing the effectiveness of the Mio-training in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and expect a strengthening of metacognition and core cognitive functions (i.e. executive functions). The Mio-Study will provide information about the role of metacognition in cognitive and physical performance and, ideally, provide evidence for a novel, interdisciplinary rehabilitation strategy for children and adolescents after cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Recruiting
        • Insespital, University Hospital Bern
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Regula Everts, Prof. Dr. phil.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent as documented by signature (see Informed Consent Form) of participants and / or parents / legal guardians
  • Age 8-16 years
  • A diagnosis of cancer either with or without CNS involvement. The participant will be included between 3 months before to 10 years after termination of treatment.
  • Treatment of cancer including either radiation, chemotherapy and/ or surgical tumor removal
  • German or French speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other instable neurological condition (e.g. epilepsy)
  • A severe psychiatric disease (e.g., eating disorder) or severe learning disability
  • Known or suspected non-compliance
  • Drug or alcohol abuse
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems
  • Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Training group
Training with Mio-App for 5 weeks, three times per week.
The Mio-App aims to increase metacognitive knowledge, teaches mnemonic skills, trains the working memory capacity and motor skills to reduce cognitive and physical long-term sequelae after cancer during adolescence.
Other Names:
  • Mio-Training
No Intervention: Control group
Waiting control group. Participants may use the Mio-App after completion of the last follow-up assessment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory
Time Frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up
Total score of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory over the three timepoints (baseline, immediate followup & 3-months follow-up). Raw values ranging 18-90. Higher scores mean better outcome.
At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wechsler Intelligence Scale For Children: 5th Ed (WISC-V)
Time Frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Indices ranging from 0 to 155. Higher scores mean better outcome.
At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Color-Word Interference Test
Time Frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Scaled Scores ranging from 1 to 19. Higher scores mean better outcome.
At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Tower of Hanoi (D-KEFS)
Time Frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Scaled Scores ranging from 1 to 19. Higher scores mean better outcome.
At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Verbal learning and memory test (VLMT)
Time Frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Percentile ranks ranging from 0-100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Pattern learning (Basic-MLT)
Time Frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Percentile ranks ranging from 0-100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
German Motor Performance Test (DMT)
Time Frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Percentile ranks ranging from 0-100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period.
Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function
Time Frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.
Percentile ranks ranging from 0-100. Higher scores mean better outcome.
At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Self-Description Questionnaire (PSDQ-S)
Time Frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.
Short version, Likert scale ranging from 1 to 6. Higher scores mean better outcome.
At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.
Pediatric quality of life multidimensional fatigue scale (PedsQL-MFS)
Time Frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.
5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean better outcome.
At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.
Questionnaire for the Assessment of Resources and Competencies in Childhood and Adolescence (FRKJ)
Time Frame: At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.
Stanine rank from 1-9. Higher score mean better outcome.
At baseline; immediately (up to 1 week) after the training or waiting period; at 3-months follow-up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Regula Everts, Prof. Dr., Division of Neuropaediatrics, Development and Rehabilitation, Department of Paediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BASEC2023-01196

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data can be shared upon reasonable request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Mio-App

Subscribe