Using EMA Data to Inform a Web-intervention for Couples Concerned About Drinking

April 22, 2026 updated by: Karen Osilla, Stanford University

Using Ecological Momentary Data to Inform a Web-intervention for Romantic Partners Concerned About Their Loved Ones Drinking

Alcohol misuse is a prevalent and serious problem with significant harms to society, individuals, and their relationships. Romantic partners have a strong influence on their partner's behavior, uniquely positioning them as a motivator and supportive factor in changing their partner's alcohol use, but little evidence exists on the specific ways they can influence their partner. The impact this has on the quality of their relationship, communication, and overall well-being has yet to be explored. Thus, this study utilizes qualitative, quantitative, and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data from both partners to develop a web-based intervention that applies communication-based personalized feedback to support the concerned partner (CP) in motivating their drinking partner (DP) to reduce drinking and other adverse relationship outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Previous research by our team and others has shown that certain CP responses to their DP's drinking (e.g., using punishment such as expressing anger or sarcasm, or threatening to leave) lead to increased DP drinking and poorer relationship functioning. Effective CP communication may affect fluctuations in DP drinking, but its mechanism is poorly understood. Limitations of prior research include long intervals between data collection points and lack of real-time dyadic data.The proposed project will use EMA and dyadic data to identify specific CP behaviors that elicit and/or inhibit DP drinking which will directly inform a CP-focused intervention. CP-focused interventions, such as Community Reinforcement and Family Therapy (CRAFT), encourage CP positive communication and reinforcement as important tools in promoting the DP's treatment entry. The DPs of CPs receiving CRAFT are 2-3 times more likely to enter alcohol treatment compared with Al-Anon or Johnson interventions and CRAFT is also effective in improving CP mental health and relationship functioning. However, CRAFT is time- and resource-intensive (i.e., 12 in-person sessions), limiting access for CPs who lack time or are hesitant to seek help. The proposed study aims to adapt CRAFT as a new WBI developed for a community sample of CPs. In contrast to the goals of CRAFT that focus on DP treatment entry, our WBI goals focus on outcomes that may be more proximal to treatment initiation and more attainable with a WBI including improved DP drinking, CP mental health and relationship functioning. In doing so, we also target DPs with a continuum of drinking severity including those who may not need treatment. Using EMA findings that elucidate communication strategies that influence DP drinking, the WBI will include psychoeducation on interaction patterns commonly associated with DP drinking and personalized feedback based on CP baseline data to support changes in CP communication strategies. This research addresses an important problem of mitigating the adverse impact of alcohol misuse on individuals and their families. The expected outcome of this research is to leverage CP influence into an accessible, theoretically-informed intervention that will help CPs more effectively communicate with their DP for improvements to their DP's drinking behavior, their own well-being, and their relationship functioning.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

275

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97207
        • Recruiting
        • Portland State University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr. Cynthia Mohr, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Concerned Partners:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • be at least 18 years of age
  • be in a romantic relationship
  • live with their partner
  • have a computer, tablet, or phone with internet access
  • have no plans to separate from partner in next 60 days
  • feel safe from partner violence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • report 4/5+ on the AUDIT-C

Drinking Partners:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • be at least 18 years of age
  • report 4/5+ on the AUDIT-C
  • have a computer, tablet, or phone with internet access
  • feel safe from partner violence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • in current treatment for alcohol
  • concern about their CPs drinking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Identify CP communication behaviors that elicit or inhibit DP drinking using EMA

Couples (N=50 dyads) with one CP and one DP will be recruited from social media. Both partners will independently complete baseline and follow-up surveys. Both the CP and DP will independently complete a 21-day EMA with three daily reports on their communication and DP's drinking (craving, motives, consumption, problems). We will identify specific CP communication behaviors as proximal and long-term predictors of the DP's drinking and non-drinking.

Hyp1: CP punishing drinking (e.g., yelling) will relate to increases in DP drinking.

Hyp2: CP rewarding drinking (e.g., bringing alcohol home) will relate to increases in DP drinking.

Hyp3: CP rewarding sobriety (e.g., planning non-drinking activities) will relate to decreases in DP drinking.

Experimental: Develop and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a WBI providing personalized feedback
We will use the Behavioral Intervention Technology Model framework to iteratively develop a four-session WBI that includes CRAFT principles and education about communication patterns learned in Aim 1. During the WBI, CPs will receive personalized feedback based on their baseline data on how their communication may influence their DP's drinking. We will evaluate the WBI's feasibility and acceptability with 15 CPs to iteratively improve the WBI.

The WBI will comprise of four sessions focusing on CRAFT principles including: (1) self-care, (2) positive communication including ways to increase responsiveness to the DP (PPR; i.e., actively listening, showing understanding, expressing interest in what their DP is thinking and feeling, and trying to see where the DPs is coming from), (3) understanding the DP's drinking reinforcers, and (4) supporting the DP if they want help and engaging in positive, healthy activities with the DP. ' partner.

Each module will take ~20-30 minutes and each session will: (1) instill optimism in CPs, (2) be solution-focused, (3) emphasize that the CP is not responsible for the DP's behaviors, and (4) use a nonjudgmental, non-confrontational, empathetic style. The WBI intervention is focused on reduced drinking in the DP and improved CP wellness.

Other Names:
  • Partners Connect
Active Comparator: Perform a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing WBI to psychoeducation control

Outcomes include DP drinking (primary), CP well-being (e.g., depression, anxiety, social support), and relationship functioning (e.g., relationship distress). Although the WBI will target CPs, we will collect data from both partners (N=80 couples) at baseline and 1-month follow-up to evaluate effects.

Hyp4: DP, CP, and relationship outcomes will show greater improvement in the WBI compared to control.

The WBI will comprise of four sessions focusing on CRAFT principles including: (1) self-care, (2) positive communication including ways to increase responsiveness to the DP (PPR; i.e., actively listening, showing understanding, expressing interest in what their DP is thinking and feeling, and trying to see where the DPs is coming from), (3) understanding the DP's drinking reinforcers, and (4) supporting the DP if they want help and engaging in positive, healthy activities with the DP. ' partner.

Each module will take ~20-30 minutes and each session will: (1) instill optimism in CPs, (2) be solution-focused, (3) emphasize that the CP is not responsible for the DP's behaviors, and (4) use a nonjudgmental, non-confrontational, empathetic style. The WBI intervention is focused on reduced drinking in the DP and improved CP wellness.

Other Names:
  • Partners Connect

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DP Alcohol Use
Time Frame: Baseline, Daily (EMA), 1-month-follow-up
The frequency of and amount of alcohol use, craving, and consequences experienced by the drinking partner
Baseline, Daily (EMA), 1-month-follow-up
CP Well-Being
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-month-follow-up
The severity of depression and anxiety symptoms, level of anger, and perceived social support in the concerned partner
Baseline, 1-month-follow-up
CP-DP Relationship Quality
Time Frame: Baseline, Daily (EMA), 1-month-follow-up
The degree of conflict and cohesion, style of communication, satisfaction, frequency of disagreement, and overall quality of the relationship
Baseline, Daily (EMA), 1-month-follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CP Communication and Responsiveness about Drinking
Time Frame: Baseline, Daily (EMA), 1-month-follow-up
The degree to which the concerned partner employs strategies to reduce the drinking partner's drinking and the level of enablement and responsiveness towards their drinking
Baseline, Daily (EMA), 1-month-follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol; Use, Problem

Clinical Trials on WBI

Subscribe