Lidocaine Versus Magnesium Sulphate in Management of Myofascial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome

September 17, 2024 updated by: Maha Abd ALMajied Mahmoud Mohamed, Misr University for Science and Technology

Evaluation of the Effect of Magnesium Sulfate Injection in Comparison to Lidocaine for Management of Myofascial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of Magnesium Sulphate in the management of myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome in comparison to Lidocaine and Saline.

A total of 75 patients suffering from myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome will be assigned into one of three groups, each with 25 patients.

Group A: (Saline) includes patients enrolled for Saline injection into the trigger points. Group B: (Magnesium Sulphate) includes patients enrolled for Magnesium Sulphate injection into the trigger points. Group C: (Lidocaine) includes patients who will be enrolled for Lidocaine injection into the trigger points The primary outcome that will be investigated is (pain with a visual analogue score), and secondary outcomes will be (maximum mouth opening between edges of upper and lower incisors with millimeters, electrical activity with Electromyography, and quality of life assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire) The outcomes will be assessed pre-injection, 1month after injection, 3months after injection, and 6 months after injection

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

75

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Maha Majied Demonstrator in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department
  • Phone Number: 00201024127018
  • Email: maha.abdalmajied@must.edu.eg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age Limitations: Participants must be between 18 and 55 years old.
  • Chronic Pain Diagnosis: Individuals must have a diagnosis of chronic myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome (MPDS) affecting the face muscles, neck, shoulder, or upper back for a duration exceeding three months.
  • Trigger Point Recognition: Patients must show awareness of their pain when pressure is applied to identified myofascial trigger points, in accordance with established diagnostic guidelines.
  • Consent to Participate: Willingness to provide informed consent and engage in all aspects of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous Treatments: A history of receiving dry needling or pulsed radiofrequency therapy, or currently participating in other pain management treatments.
  • Recent Injury or Surgery: Any recent trauma, surgical procedures, or infections in the affected area within the past six months.
  • Medication Interference: Current or recent use of moderate to strong analgesics (e.g., tramadol, morphine) that could influence pain assessment.
  • Severe Health Conditions: Individuals with significant systemic illnesses (e.g., severe liver or kidney disease), blood clotting disorders, rheumatoid arthritis or epilepsy.
  • Mental Health: Presence of current psychiatric disorders, cognitive impairments, or inability to comply with the study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Saline arm
After localization of the trigger points, the skin was disinfected with alcohol, the tight muscle band was grabbed between two fingers, and a 30-gage 3/4-inch needle was introduced 1-2 cm away from the trigger points at a 30º angle to the skin. Negative aspiration was performed and each trigger point was injected with 2 ml of saline
After localization of the trigger points, the skin was disinfected with alcohol, the tight muscle band was grabbed between two fingers, and a 30-gage 3/4-inch needle was introduced 1-2 cm away from the trigger point at a 30º angle to the skin. Negative aspiration was performed and each trigger point was injected with 2 ml of Saline
Active Comparator: Lidocaine arm
After localization of the trigger points, the skin was disinfected with alcohol, the tight muscle band was grabbed between two fingers, and a 30-gage 3/4-inch needle was introduced 1-2 cm away from the trigger points at a 30º angle to the skin. Negative aspiration was performed and each trigger point was injected with 2 ml of lidocaine
After localization of the trigger points, the skin was disinfected with alcohol, the tight muscle band was grabbed between two fingers, and a 30-gage 3/4-inch needle was introduced 1-2 cm away from the trigger point at a 30º angle to the skin. Negative aspiration was performed and each trigger point was injected with 2 ml of Lidocaine
Active Comparator: Magnesium Sulphate arm
After localization of the trigger points, the skin was disinfected with alcohol, the tight muscle band was grabbed between two fingers, and a 30-gage 3/4-inch needle was introduced 1-2 cm away from the trigger points at a 30º angle to the skin. Negative aspiration was performed and each trigger point was injected with 2 ml of magnesium sulphate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score
Time Frame: At interval pre-injection and 1, 3, and 6 months after injection.
Pain intensity was assessed using a 10-cm line visual analog scale (VAS) that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain." with 0 cm representing no pain, and 10 cm representing the worst pain imaginable.
At interval pre-injection and 1, 3, and 6 months after injection.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The maximum mouth opening
Time Frame: At interval pre-injection and 1, 3, and 6 months after injection.
The maximum mouth opening (MMO) was evaluated by measuring the interincisal distance between the upper and lower central incisors.
At interval pre-injection and 1, 3, and 6 months after injection.
Electrical activity
Time Frame: At interval pre-injection and 1, 3, and 6 months after injection.
Measured using electromyography, EMG can provide valuable insights into altered muscle activity patterns and help in the diagnosis and management of myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome through readings.
At interval pre-injection and 1, 3, and 6 months after injection.
Quality of life
Time Frame: At interval pre-injection and 1, 3, and 6 months after injection.
evaluated using the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-14), which consists of 14 items categorized into seven domains of oral health. Participants were instructed to score each item on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates never, 1 represents hardly ever, 2 signifies occasionally, 3 denotes fairly often, and 4 corresponds to very often. The total score was computed by summing the responses to all 14 items, with higher scores reflecting a greater negative impact on oral health-related quality of life
At interval pre-injection and 1, 3, and 6 months after injection.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

September 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myofascial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Saline

Subscribe