Examination of Nociscan Impact on Discogenic Low Back Pain Surgical Outcomes (CLARITY)

May 27, 2026 updated by: Aclarion

A Multi-Center Randomized Clinical Study of the NOCISCAN MR Spectroscopy (MRS) in Patients Treated for Discogenic Low Back Pain

This study is looking into how safe and useful NOCISCAN is. NOCISCAN is a software as a Service (SaaS) tool that uses Magnetic Resonance (MR) spectroscopy. Nociscan (instead of 'It') leverages MRS to noninvasively help physicians distinguish between painful and nonpainful discs in the lumbar spine. The randomized controlled trial will compare the blinded and unblinded cohorts and their corresponding surgical outcomes with the Nocigram reports, generated prior to treatment, for each patient."

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90210
        • Recruiting
        • Todd H. Lanman, M.D Inc
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Todd Lanman, MD
        • Contact:
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • Recruiting
        • Scripps Health
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hani Malone, MD
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • Recruiting
        • USC Keck Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patrick Hsieh, MD
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Recruiting
        • University of Miami/ Jackson Health System
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gregory Basil, MD
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Northwestern University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alpesh Patel, MD
      • Park Ridge, Illinois, United States, 60068
        • Recruiting
        • Advocate Aurora Research Institute
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patrick Sugrue, MD
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel Lubelski, MD
    • Texas
      • Plano, Texas, United States, 75093
        • Recruiting
        • Texas Back Institute
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alexander Satin, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting with back pain potentially caused by lumbar degenerative disc disease. Patients may be symptomatic at one level or two levels. Patients must be indicated for surgical treatment of their discogenic low back pain. Patients must also meet all study inclusion criteria and none of the study exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is a skeletally mature male or female (non-pregnant) aged 18 to 70 years (inclusive);
  2. Subject plans to undergo surgical treatment of their discogenic back pain independent of this research protocol;
  3. Subject is to be treated with on-label use of FDA-cleared or FDA-approved devices independent of this research protocol;
  4. Subject has a diagnosis of discogenic back pain that requires treatment in up to two lumbar levels caused by degenerative disc disease (identified via MRI);
  5. Subject has a preoperative Oswestry Disability Questionnaire score ≥35 out of 100 points (35/100);
  6. Subject has a VAS back pain score of ≥40mm and that is greater than the worst VAS leg pain score;
  7. Subject has failed at least ≥ 6 months of non-operative treatment (for example: physical therapy, bed rest, anti-inflammatory or analgesic medications, chiropractic care, acupuncture, massage therapy or home-directed lumbar exercise programs) OR requires urgent surgical treatment per the investigator;
  8. Subject has signed the IRB approved Informed Consent Form; and
  9. Subject is psychosocially, mentally and physically able and willing to fully comply with this protocol including adhering to follow-up schedule and requirements and filling out forms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has a primary diagnosis of spinal condition other than degenerative disc disease at the involved level (i.e., facet joint pain/SI pain);
  2. Subject has had prior lumbar back surgery or intradiscal treatments at any lumbar level (Note: diagnostic provocative or anesthetic discography are not excluded; micro-discectomy, decompression, or laminectomy patients greater than 6 months postop are not excluded);
  3. Surgery is planned for more than 2 lumbar levels.
  4. Subject has severe spinal canal stenosis as assessed by the Investigator;
  5. Subject has a motor strength deficit(s) in lower extremities
  6. Subject has a lumbar spine diagnosis, based on radiographic evidence, of clinically relevant lumbar vertebral abnormalities (except Modic end-plate changes, which are not excluded), including:

    • Spondylolisthesis Grade 2 or greater (up to Grade 1 is accepted)
    • Pars fracture, at the involved level
    • Spondylolysis
    • Lumbar scoliosis with a Cobb angle of greater than 15°
    • Evidence of prior fracture or trauma to the L1, L2, L3, L4, or L5 levels in either compression or burst
    • Lumbar kyphosis
  7. Subject has radiologic evidence of an uncontained lumbar disc herniation or lumbar disc extrusion.
  8. Subject is contraindicated for a standard lumbar MRI exam
  9. Women who are currently pregnant (or believe they may be at risk of being or becoming pregnant), or are breast feeding, during the study period when scans will be performed
  10. Subject is currently receiving worker's compensation or is involved in in any litigation for personal injury, medical negligence, trauma, or worker's compensation.
  11. Subject has a chronic disease (other than degenerative disc disease), chronic pain (other than discogenic low back pain), or psychological dysfunction, which may, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, compromise a subject's ability to comply with study procedures, and/or may confound data
  12. Subject has a BMI > 40

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Blinded-to-NOCISCAN
NOCISCAN completed pre-operatively. Investigator will not have access to NOCISCAN result.
The surgical treatment will be decided by the treating investigator based on their clinical judgement.
Unblinded-to-NOCISCAN
NOCISCAN completed pre-operatively. Investigator will have access to the NOCISCAN result after completing initial treatment plan but before treatment.
The surgical treatment will be decided by the treating investigator based on their clinical judgement.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in back pain on 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months

The primary endpoint is change in back pain as measured on a 100mm VAS Back at 12 months compared to baseline.

VAS is a measurement instrument that measures the amount of pain that a subject feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Higher scores closer to the extreme pain range indicate worse outcome.

Baseline to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
20 mm improvement in back pain on 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Assessment
Time Frame: From Baseline to each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)
VAS is a measurement instrument that measures the amount of pain that a subject feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Higher scores closer to the extreme pain range indicate worse outcome.
From Baseline to each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)
20 mm improvement in worst leg pain on a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Assessment
Time Frame: From Baseline to each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)
VAS is a measurement instrument that measures the amount of pain that a subject feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Higher scores closer to the extreme pain range indicate worse outcome.
From Baseline to each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)
Patient reported treatment satisfaction survey
Time Frame: Each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)
Patient Satisfaction survey is a self-reported questionnaire to measure the subject's satisfaction of the treatment under the protocol.
Each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 score
Time Frame: Each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)
The PROMIS-29 v2. 0 profile assesses pain intensity using a single 0-10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) using four items per domain.
Each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)
Cumulative proportion of responders (CPRA) for 15 point Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) change (out of 100)
Time Frame: From Baseline to each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-item questionnaire that scores disability on a percentile scale from 0-100%. The ODI score is interpreted as follows:

0-20%: Minimal disability 20-40%: Moderate disability 40-60%: Severe disability 60-80%: Crippling effects 80-100%: Completely disabled and bedbound

From Baseline to each follow up visit (3-Months, 6-Months, 12- Months, and 24 Months)
Absence of Secondary surgical intervention
Time Frame: From Baseline through study completion, 24-Months
Secondary surgical interventions may include revision, reoperation, removal or supplemental fixation at any level in the lumbar spine.
From Baseline through study completion, 24-Months
Correlation of preoperative NOCISCAN Biomarkers with preoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Assessment Scores
Time Frame: From Baseline through study completion, 24-Months
VAS is a measurement instrument that measures the amount of pain that a subject feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Higher scores closer to the extreme pain range indicate worse outcome.
From Baseline through study completion, 24-Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 11, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Discogenic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Fusion or TDR determined by investigator.

Subscribe