The Effect of NOn-invasive Respiratory Support on outcoMe and Its Risks in SARS-COV-2-related Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (NORMO2)

January 2, 2025 updated by: Carmen Reep, Erasmus Medical Center

Effects of Early vs. Delayed Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Target Trial Emulation

To determine whether early endotracheal intubation compared to late endotracheal intubation affects clinical outcome (duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, mortality).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Non-invasive respiratory support, especially HFNO is usually well-tolerated, especially in COVID-19 patients and can be applied for a prolonged period of time. However, there is a heated debate whether later/delayed endotracheal intubation (due to HFNO / NIV) increases the risk of lung injury, so-called patient self-inflicted lung-injury (P-SILI). The concept of P-SILI assumes that high forces applied to the lung resulting from strenuous breathing effort generated by the patient exacerbates lung-injury and is associated with adverse clinical outcome. It is therefore important to investigate if a longer period of non-invasive respiratory support before invasive mechanical ventilation is associated with adverse clinical outcome. Thus, it is unknown if delaying invasive ventilation worsens clinical outcome. In this study, the research question is whether early compared to late endotracheal intubation improves clinical outcome (duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, mortality)? The aim is to identify the optimal S/F ratio and respiratory rate thresholds for initiating intubation to either improve survival or reduce the duration of invasive ventilation without compromising survival. This is achieved by comparing 25 dynamic treatment regimes defined by combinations of S/F thresholds (<any, 250, 200, 150, 100) and respiratory rate thresholds (>any, 16, 20, 25, 30). Thresholds indicating less severe illness (e.g., S/F < 250 and RR > 16) are considered 'early intubation,' while thresholds indicating more severe illness (e.g., S/F < 100 and RR > 30) are considered 'late intubation'.

Two sensitivity analyses will be conducted:

  1. Restricting to patients without hypercapnia (pCO2 < 45), excluding those with missing pCO2 values or pCO2 > 45.
  2. Including only patients with non-missing Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) values and adjusting for GCS as a confounder.

Additionally, seven subgroup analyses will be conducted:

  1. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19
  2. Patients with a history of COPD
  3. Patients with a history of CHF
  4. Patients with BMI ≤ 30
  5. Patients with BMI > 30
  6. Patients on high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) at time zero
  7. Patients on non-invasive ventilation (NIV) at time zero

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Zuid-Holland
      • Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 3015GD
        • Recruiting
        • Erasmus Medical Centre
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients from the United Stated for which data is registered in the National Covid Cohort Collaborative (N3C).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalized (inpatient or ICU)
  • 18 years or older
  • Hypoxemic respiratory failure: S/F<250
  • Not yet intubated

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not intubate order
  • Presence of tracheostomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28-day RMTL of mortality
Time Frame: 28 days
Mortality restricted mean time lost (RMTL) over the 28-day period (area under the cumulative incidence function curve)
28 days
28-day mortality risk
Time Frame: 28 days
Mortality risk at day 28
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 50-56300-98-2113

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Target Trial Emulation, Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Clinical Trials on endotracheal intubation

Subscribe