Mechanistic and Clinical Outcomes of a Surgical Innovation Aimed at Minimizing GERD Associated With VSG (INNOVATE-VSG) (INNOVATE-VSG)

April 8, 2026 updated by: Nihn Tuan Nguyen, University of California, Irvine

Mechanistic and Clinical Outcomes of a Surgical Innovation Aimed at Minimizing GERD Associated With Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (INNOVATE-VSG)

This is a two-site randomized clinical trial aiming to test whether a modified investigational bariatric surgical procedure can improve gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after sleeve gastrectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will examine whether a modified vertical sleeve gastrectomy (mVSG) will improve GERD and quality of life.

Aim 1 (Primary): to determine whether mVSG, in comparison to conventional vertical sleeve gastrectomy (cVSG), will be associated with lower acid exposure time (AET, measured by the Bravo pH test) at 6-9 months. The investigators hypothesize that, at Month 6-9, compared to cVSG:

• H1. mVSG will be associated with lower AET

Aim 2 (Secondary): To elucidate the mechanistic basis for Aim 1, the investigators will perform following tests, before and at 6-9 months post-surgery: a) High resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) to determine the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and intragastric pressure; b) The endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) testing to examine changes in compliance of the LES; c) Measure the length of the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) on the retroflex view during endoscopic exam. The investigators hypothesize that, at Month 6-9, compared to cVSG:

  • H2a. mVSG will be associated with higher LES pressure and lower intragastric pressure
  • H2b. mVSG will be associated with lower LES compliance
  • H2c. GEFV will be present after mVSG (vs absence after cVSG)

Aim 3: Examine the impact of GERD on quality of life (QoL) with two validated rating scales - Gastroesophageal reflux disease-health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and Short Form-36 (SF-36). The investigators hypothesize that, at 12 months, compared to cVSG:

• H3. mVSG will lead to superior QoL

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92628
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, Irvine
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92093
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, San Diego
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and female subjects aged 18-65 years
  2. Body mass index (BMI) 35-55 kg/m2
  3. Must meet the BMI criteria before and after 6 months of nonsurgical weight management
  4. Presence of GERD defined for this trial as acid exposure time (AET) of 4.9% or above as assessed with the Bravo pH test.
  5. Have health insurance which pays for the costs of bariatric surgery and standard medical care before and after surgery
  6. Women of childbearing potential must be using appropriate contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study, and must have a negative pregnancy test at study entry and prior to surgery
  7. Must be able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hiatal hernia >2cm (defined as maximum axial height from end of the esophagus to diaphragm by any study including upper endoscopy esophagram and or at the time of surgery)
  2. Evidence of clinically significant major esophageal motility disorder as determined by the site primary investigator
  3. Severe gastroparesis
  4. Previous bariatric or anti-reflux procedure
  5. Barrett's esophagus
  6. Subjects requiring mesh treatment at time of procedure
  7. Severe heart (e.g., severe heart failure, unstable coronary artery disease), or end-stage lung disease as determined by the site primary investigator
  8. Subjects with pacemakers, implantable defibrillators, neurostimulators
  9. Portal hypertension or cirrhosis
  10. Chronic pancreatitis
  11. Active cancer treatment
  12. Inability to tolerate general anesthesia
  13. Uncontrollable coagulopathy
  14. Significant and uncontrolled inflammatory bowel disease
  15. Severe and/or uncontrolled psychiatric disorder (including psychosis, bipolar disorder) as determined during standard pre-surgery psychiatric screening at the site.
  16. Suicidal ideation or unstable/untreated major depressive disorder within the past year
  17. Alcohol or substance use disorder within the past year.
  18. Pregnant or breastfeeding or planning pregnancy in the coming 24 months
  19. Diminished intellectual capacity to consent or follow pre- and post-surgery instructions
  20. History of, or any current health condition that, in the opinion of the PI, would make the subject ineligible for sleeve gastrectomy, or put the subject at risk by participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Modified Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (mVSG)
modified investigational vertical sleeve gastrectomy (mVSG)
The modified procedure preserves the gastric sling fibers and re-establishes the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV).
Active Comparator: Conventional Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (cVSG)
conventional vertical sleeve gastrectomy (cVSG)
Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy as standard procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
% Acid Exposure Time (%AET)
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, Month 6-9 post surgery
Change in %AET in percentage points at Month 6-9 relative to pre-surgery %AET assessed with the Bravo pH test
Pre-surgery, Month 6-9 post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LES pressure
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, Month 6-9 post surgery
Change in LES pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) assessed with High Resolution Esophageal Manometry (HREM)
Pre-surgery, Month 6-9 post surgery
Intragastric pressure
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, Month 6-9 post surgery
Change in intragastric pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) assessed with HREM
Pre-surgery, Month 6-9 post surgery
LES compliance
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, Month 6-9 post surgery
Change in LES compliance in ratio of mm3/mmHg assessed with EndoFLIP
Pre-surgery, Month 6-9 post surgery
GEFV length
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, Month 6-9 post surgery
Change in GEFV length in millimeters (mm) assessed with endoscopic exam
Pre-surgery, Month 6-9 post surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
GERD-HRQL score
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, Months 4, 6-9, 12 post surgery
Change in GERD-HRQL score assessed with GERD-HRQL questionnaire
Pre-surgery, Months 4, 6-9, 12 post surgery
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Pre-surgery, Months 4, 6-9, 12 post surgery
Change in SF-36 score assessed with SF-36 questionnaire
Pre-surgery, Months 4, 6-9, 12 post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ninh T. Nguyen, MD, University of California, Irvine
  • Principal Investigator: Ravinder K. Mittal, MD, University of California, San Diego

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 21, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Modified Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (mVSG)

Subscribe