PuraStat® Combined With Adrenaline Versus Standard of Care in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

March 25, 2025 updated by: Raquel Ballester, Tallaght University Hospital

PuraStat® Combined With Adrenaline Versus Standard of Care in Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Multicentric International Clinical Trial.

PuraStat® is a novel gel that offers several advantages over traditional hemostatic powders. Its transparency allows for continuous visualization of the bleeding site, and it can be applied in narrow spaces or in combination with other treatments. Additionally, the pre-filled syringe design ensures ease of handling and precise delivery.

Most published data on PuraStat® as a hemostatic agent originates from surgical settings. In endoscopy, its primary applications have been in polypectomy-related hemostasis and the promotion of wound healing. Reports indicate a hemostasis success rate of 90.4%, with a recurrence rate of 10.4%.

Limited data exist regarding the efficacy of PuraStat® as a hemostatic agent in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) lesions. This study hypothesizes that PuraStat®, when combined with Adrenaline, serves as a feasible and effective first-line treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding. To evaluate this, a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial is proposed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Endoscopic treatment serves as the first-line approach in managing upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), demonstrating effectiveness in reducing re-bleeding rates, the need for surgical intervention, and mortality. In non-variceal UGIB, endoscopic management includes various techniques such as injection therapy, thermal therapy, mechanical therapy, or a combination, depending on the lesion type. However, certain factors, including the anatomical location of the lesion, underlying fibrosis, or diffuse bleeding, can present challenges to successful treatment.

Haemostatic powders have been increasingly utilized as both primary and salvage therapy for bleeding control in various clinical scenarios, including post-polypectomy bleeding, bleeding associated with colonic tumors, diverticula, arteriovenous malformations, radiation proctitis, ischemic colitis, and surgical intestinal anastomoses. Their use in UGIB management has also expanded. Compared to other modalities, these topical agents offer advantages such as ease of application, the ability to reach lesions in challenging locations, and coverage of larger surface areas without requiring precise targeting.

Among the most extensively studied topical hemostatic agents are TC-325 (Hemospray®, Cook Medical), the Polysaccharide Hemostatic System (Endoclot® PHS), and Inha University-Endoscopic Wound Dressing (UI-EWD) (NextBiomedical Co., Incheon, South Korea). These agents have demonstrated high rates of immediate haemostasis (86%-100%) when used alone or in combination with other haemostatic methods, exhibiting excellent feasibility and a favorable safety profile.

The primary limitation of these agents is their adherence exclusively to actively bleeding sites, leading to rapid washout within 12-24 hours, thereby making them a temporary measure. Additionally, their opacity obscures the underlying mucosa after application, preventing further visualization of the lesion during the procedure. Further studies are required to better define the role of hemostatic powders, establish optimal use settings, and evaluate long-term efficacy and safety in bleeding control.

PuraStat® is a novel gel that provides several advantages over traditional hemostatic powders. Its transparency allows for continuous visualization of the bleeding site, and it can be applied in narrow spaces or in combination with other treatments. The pre-filled syringe design facilitates ease of handling and precise delivery.

To date, most published data on PuraStat® as a haemostatic agent originates from surgical settings. In endoscopy, its primary applications have been in polypectomy-related haemostasis and the promotion of wound healing. Reports indicate a haemostasis success rate of 90.4%, with a recurrence rate of 10.4%. However, data on its efficacy in UGIB lesions remain limited.

This study hypothesizes that PuraStat®, when combined with Adrenaline, represents a feasible and effective first-line treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding, potentially matching or surpassing the current standard of care. A prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial is proposed. During endoscopy, patients requiring treatment will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: standard care or Adrenaline injection combined with PuraStat®. If haemostasis is not achieved with the initial treatment, the alternative approach will be applied. Patients will be monitored for 30 days to assess bleeding recurrence. The study aims to enroll 126 patients (63 per group).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

126

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Lleida, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida
        • Contact:
          • Raquel Ballester, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Undergoing endoscopic therapy for non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Variceal or portal hypertension-related gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Lack of signed consent form
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PuraStat® combined with Adrenaline
In this experimental arm PuraStat® (mL) will be administered in combination with an injection of Adrenaline (mL).
PuraStat® application (mL) combined with Adrenaline injection (mL)
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
This arm will be the active comparator, will include all types of standard of care currently recommended for the treatment of bleeding lesions, such as, adrenaline injection + second hemostasis modality (contact thermal, mechanical therapy, or injection of a sclerosing agent).
Adrenaline injection + second hemostasis modality (contact thermal, mechanical therapy, or injection of a sclerosing agent).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical success
Time Frame: 30 days
Absence of rebleeding (recurrence of haematemesis, maelena and /or haematochezia, recurrent tachycardia or hypotension after achieving hemodynamic stability, or a reduction in haemoglobin ≥ 2 g/dL after a stable haemoglobin value has been attained) observed within the first 4 weeks following the initial endoscopic treatment.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success
Time Frame: During endoscopy
Ability to achieve haemostasis and/or complete the endoscopic treatment satisfactorily
During endoscopy
Duration of the procedure
Time Frame: During endoscopy
From the bleeding lesion is detected until the end of the endoscopic treatment.
During endoscopy

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of difficulty
Time Frame: During endoscopy
Graded in three categories: Very Easy (no difficulties encountered and no effort needed), Easy (mild difficulties and mild effort needed), Difficult (difficulties encountered and a considerable effort needed or Very Difficult (high difficulties and high effort or skills needed to treat the lesion
During endoscopy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Clinical Trials on PuraStat® combined with Adrenaline

Subscribe