Interposed Nucleus aDBS for Ataxia

January 6, 2026 updated by: University of Florida

Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Targeting the Interposed Nucleus to Treat Spinocerebellar Ataxia

This is a single-center, open-label study designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of cerebellar adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) in adults with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6). A total of 5 participants will be enrolled.

Participants will undergo surgical implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads targeting the motor interposed nucleus of the cerebellum. The leads will be connected to one or two implantable pulse generators capable of delivering stimulation to deep brain structures and recording neural activity.

Participants will complete up to 18 in-person study visits over a 24-month follow-up period. During these visits, neural signals will be recorded under varying behavioral tasks and stimulation conditions.

Early study visits will be used to identify optimal stimulation parameters and neural biomarkers associated with disease state. These biomarkers will subsequently be used to implement adaptive DBS, in which stimulation amplitude is automatically adjusted in response to recorded neural activity.

Study outcomes will include assessments of safety and feasibility of cerebellar aDBS, as well as preliminary evaluation of its effects on clinical measures.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of SCA6 by a movement disorders specialist following established criteria recommended by the Movement Disorders Society
  • A positive genetic test for SCA6
  • A total score ≥ 8 on the Scale of the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) rating scale
  • Ability to walk with or without support (score <8 on the 'gait' subsection of the SARA rating scale)
  • Age ≥ 21 years and <89 years
  • Ability to give informed consent for the study
  • Ability to understand the study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or unwillingness to comply with the study protocol
  • History of previously implanted neurostimulators, pacemakers, defibrillators, or metallic head implants
  • Severe cognitive impairment or dementia, defined as a score <21 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
  • Evidence of ataxia due to other etiologies, including but not limited to:

    • Genetic/inherited disorders other than SCA6
    • Acquired causes: traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, infections or post-infectious cerebellitis, autoimmune ataxias (e.g., anti-GAD, gluten ataxia)
    • Toxic/metabolic causes: alcoholic cerebellar degeneration, vitamin deficiencies
    • Structural, vascular, or neoplastic causes: cerebellar stroke, tumors, congenital malformations
    • Suspected multiple system atrophy-cerebellar type (MSA-C)
  • Presence of active and untreated psychiatric illness, severe depression (Beck Depression Inventory ≥ 21), or personality disorder at the discretion of the study team
  • Coagulopathy, uncontrolled epilepsy, or other medical conditions that are considered to place the patient at elevated risk for surgical complications
  • Presence of a concomitant medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with the study participation or gait/balance, for example, severe arthritis
  • Requirement of diathermy, electroconvulsive therapy, or transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Active suicidal ideation, defined as a "Yes" response to questions #2-5 on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, C-SSRS
  • Refractory epilepsy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation (aDBS)

Participants will undergo surgical implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads targeting the motor interposed nucleus of the cerebellum. Approximately one month after implantation, participants will begin conventional DBS (cDBS) programming to identify optimal stimulation parameters, including amplitude, contact configuration, frequency, and pulse width, and to assess stimulation-related adverse effects and device function.

Approximately nine months after implantation, stimulation settings will be transitioned to adaptive DBS (aDBS), in which stimulation amplitude is automatically adjusted based on recorded neural activity. Adaptive DBS will be used to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of cerebellar aDBS.

Clinical outcomes, symptoms, and potential side effects will be assessed throughout the study using participant self-reports, validated clinical rating scales, and wearable devices to collect movement and sleep data.

This device will be surgically implanted into the interposed nucleus of the cerebellum.
Other Names:
  • Medtronic Percept

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The identification of a physiological signal to use as the aDBS feedback signal
Time Frame: From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.
Local field potentials (LFP) will be recorded in the clinic as well as chronically at home. These recordings will be analyzed to identify electrophysiological markers of disease states and therapeutic effects.
From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.
The incidence of unexpected adverse events and serious adverse events with aDBS compared to baseline
Time Frame: From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.
Adverse events are monitored the entire time subject is enrolled in study. Unexpected and serious adverse events from baseline through study completion, about 2 years, is a primary endpoint.
From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Upright Balance Assessment measured by force plate parameters
Time Frame: From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.
The Upright Balance Assessment is designed to evaluate walking and balance.
From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.
The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
Time Frame: From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.
The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is an 8-item performance based scale used to determine the severity of ataxia. Scoring ranges from 0 to 40, with a higher score indicating greater ataxia severity.
From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.
The Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia (PROM-Ataxia)
Time Frame: From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.
The Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia (PROM-Ataxia) is a 70-item scale divided into three domains of patient experiences assessing physical function, activities of daily living (ADL), and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 280, with a higher score indicating more severe symptoms and poorer quality of life.
From baseline through study completion, about 2 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Coralie de Hemptinne, PhD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6

  • University of Florida
    Acorda Therapeutics
    Completed
    Spinocerebellar Ataxias Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxias Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxias Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxias Type 6
    United States
  • Cadent Therapeutics
    Withdrawn
    Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxias | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 10 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 8 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 17 | ARCA1 - Autosomal Recessive...
    United States
  • Teachers College, Columbia University
    Active, not recruiting
    Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7
    United States
  • Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    Completed
    Spinocerebellar Ataxias | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 6 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 7 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 8 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype...
    United States
  • University of Florida
    University of California, Los Angeles; National Ataxia Foundation
    Recruiting
    Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6
    United States
  • Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    Active, not recruiting
    Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxias | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 10 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 8
    United States, China
  • University of California, Los Angeles
    Active, not recruiting
    Spinocerebellar Ataxias | Spinocerebellar Ataxia 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 | MSA-C
    United States
  • University of Chicago
    Pfizer; Biogen; APDM Wearable Technologies
    Completed
    Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Friedreich Ataxia | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6
    United States
  • Sclnow Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
    Not yet recruiting
    Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6
  • University of California, San Francisco
    Raynor Cerebellum Project
    Recruiting
    Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA)
    United States

Clinical Trials on Deep Brain Stimulation

Subscribe