Effects of Implementing a Program to Develop Emotional Skills and Post-traumatic Growth in Adolescents and Young Adults Receiving Child Welfare Services-a Pilot Study in the Haute-Loire Department (JEMotion43)

February 9, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Emile Roux
Adolescents and young adults receiving child welfare services constitute a vulnerable population, with an overrepresentation of mental health issues and past trauma, often exacerbated by a difficult transition to independence. Current support focuses mainly on material needs, lacking specific interventions targeting psychological resilience. This study draws on literature demonstrating that the development of emotional skills and post-traumatic growth are major protective factors promoting psychosocial adaptation and mental health.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Marie PEURIERE
  • Phone Number: +33 04.71.04.35.38

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Minors: > 15 to < 18 years old:

    1. Be taken in or accompanied by a child protection service.
    2. Have given informed consent to participate in the study.
    3. Have obtained authorization from those with parental authority.

Young adults aged ≥ 18 to 21:

  1. Have signed a young adult contract (CJM) with the Child Welfare Service (ASE).
  2. Have given their informed consent to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group
Participation in a structured 6-week program focused on emotional skills development and psychoeducation on post-traumatic growth (JEMotion43 program).

completion of all questionnaires :

  • l'Adverse Childhood Experiences-International Questionnaire
  • Benevolent Childhood Experiences
  • Emotional Competency Profile
  • psychological distress (K6)
  • Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale
  • Post traumatic Growth Inventory
  • Attention Assessment Tests
  • Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
  • Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function

Programm JEMotion : 6-week emotional skills development and psychoeducation program. It consists of 8 modules of 2 hours each.

The program is structured around a variety of activities based on pedagogical and experiential principles. It includes enriching emotional vocabulary, identifying emotional components, and exploring their functional value.

Active Comparator: Control Group
Use, over the same period, of a mobile app promoting mental health (WeCare / Care Island).

completion of all questionnaires :

  • l'Adverse Childhood Experiences-International Questionnaire
  • Benevolent Childhood Experiences
  • Emotional Competency Profile
  • psychological distress (K6)
  • Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale
  • Post traumatic Growth Inventory
  • Attention Assessment Tests
  • Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
  • Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function

Mobile app promoting mental health for teens aged 14 to 17. It is a gamified, self-guided 6-week digital program (about 1 hour per week), incorporating techniques from cognitive behavioral therapy, positive psychology, and lifestyle medicine.

The game offers a narrative journey through an imaginary world consisting of six islands, each corresponding to a health and well-being theme: physical activity, stress management, sleep, addictive behaviors, emotional regulation, automatic thoughts, and self-compassion. Side quests also address balanced eating and the integration of positive psychology practices into everyday life.

The player takes on the role of a hero accompanied by their guide, tasked with restoring the vital balance of the islands threatened by pollution and destruction. The player must clean up the islands, recycle waste into seeds, regenerate nature, and interact with totem animals, which impart psychoeducational lessons related to mental health.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotional Competence
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
score assessed by Emotional Skills Profile. 45 items from this instrument assess the management of one's own emotions. 15 subscale covers five skills : identifying, understanding, expressing, regulating, and using emotions, over 3 targets : self / others / context Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The total ESP score ranges from 45 to 225 (45 items rated from 1 to 5) and reflects the overall level of emotional skills, with a low score indicating poorly developed skills, a medium score indicating adequate emotional functioning, and a high score indicating good abilities to identify, express, regulate, and use emotions.
Baseline and 6 months
post-traumatic growth
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months

Score assessed by Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) This 21-item questionnaire measures perceived positive psychological changes following adversity. It covers five dimensions: relationships with others, personal strength, new possibilities, spiritual changes, and appreciation of life.

The score is calculated by adding up the scores for the 21 items (rated from 0 = no change to 5 = very significant change), giving a total score between 0 and 105. Subscale scores can also be obtained by adding up the items corresponding to each of the five dimensions.

A low score indicates little perceived positive change after the event, a moderate score indicates partial growth, and a high score indicates significant positive psychological transformation.

Baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychological distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week before intervention and 6 months
Psychological distress will be measured using the French version of the Kessler Brief Symptom Inventory (K6). This 6-item self-report questionnaire assesses the frequency of nonspecific emotional distress symptoms (e.g., feeling "nervous" or "despairing") over the past 30 days. Responses are given on a 5-point scale indicating frequency (from "Never" to "All the time"). To calculate the score, responses are rated from 0 to 4, generating a total score ranging from 0 to 24, where a higher score indicates greater distress.
Baseline, 1 week before intervention and 6 months
Mental well-being
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week before intervention and 6 months
Mental well-being will be assessed using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale.The total WEMWBS score ranges from 14 to 70 and reflects the overall level of mental well-being, with a low score indicating reduced well-being, a medium score indicating moderate well-being, and a high score indicating significant and positive mental well-being.
Baseline, 1 week before intervention and 6 months
executive functions
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week before intervention and 6 months
The Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functions is a self-assessment questionnaire for executive functions. It comprises 75 items assessing 9 areas of executive functions. The total score is expressed as a T-score (mean 50, standard deviation 10) and reflects the overall level of executive functioning, with a T-score ≥ 65 indicating significant difficulties, T 60-64 indicating a borderline area, and T < 60 indicating average executive functioning.
Baseline, 1 week before intervention and 6 months
Attention
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week before intervention and 6 months
The Attention Assessment Tests score is summarized by standardized scores or percentiles for each domain (sustained, divided, selective attention, and motor inhibition), reflecting overall attentional performance, where high scores indicate adequate attention and executive control, and low scores reveal specific difficulties in one or more aspects of attention.
Baseline, 1 week before intervention and 6 months
working memory
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week before intervention and 6 months
The ARITHMETIC and NUMBER MEMORY subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale can be used to assess working memory. The Working Memory Index, based on the Arithmetic and Number Memory subtests, is expressed as a standard score (mean 100, standard deviation 15 for the overall index, or 10/3 for the subtests) and reflects working memory capacity, where a low score indicates difficulties in maintaining and manipulating information, an average score indicates expected functioning, and a high score indicates above-average working memory.
Baseline, 1 week before intervention and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mathieu PEREIRA, Université Lumière Lyon 2

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Welfare

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire and Physical Exam

Subscribe