Cognitive and Metacognitive Remediation in Addiction Treatment. (R'COMET)

February 17, 2026 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Cognitive and Metacognitive Remediation in Addiction Treatment: Randomized Controlled Trial of Efficacy in Parallel Arms

Cognitive and metacognitive remediation in addiction treatment: Value of Adding a cognitive remediation program to improve overall self-efficacy in patients with alcohol use disorder.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is the third leading risk factor for morbidity worldwide and represents a major public health issue. It is associated with numerous somatic and psychological harms, as well as cognitive impairments that lead to a deterioration in quality of life and continued AUD. It is therefore essential that cognitive disorders be targeted for treatment, along with craving, emotional dysregulation, and erroneous beliefs. Similarly, strengthening the sense of self-efficacy plays a crucial role in the recovery of patients with AUD and helps consolidate their ability to cope with the challenges of daily life. Several studies have demonstrated the benefits of cognitive remediation, and the need to offer this type of care more systematically has been widely advocated in several literature reviews. Based on data from the literature and validated cognitive remediation programs, the R'COMET program was designed for patients with SUD. It combines cognitive remediation, emotion perception, and metacognition. The aim of this program is to improve cognitive and metacognitive functions and to enhance the sense of self-efficacy, which is a major determinant of recovery in addictive disorders.

The objective of the R'COMET study is to evaluate the effectiveness of this program on overall self-efficacy, cognitive and metacognitive performance, alcohol consumption, and quality of life in patients with AUD, at the end of the program and at 3 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Blain, France
        • EPSM Epsylan
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Léa BLUTEAU, MD
      • Bouguenais, France
        • EPSM Georges Daumézon
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jennyfer CHOLET, MD
      • Brest, France
        • CHRU Brest
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Morgane GUILLOU-LANDREART, MD
      • Brest, France
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU de Nantes
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Leslie TOUATI-HUREAU
      • Quimper, France
        • EPSM du Finistère Sud
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stéphane BILLARD, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 18 and 65 (inclusive).
  • Native French speaker or educated in French.
  • Primary diagnosis of AUD according to DSM-5, with or without comorbid SUD.
  • Currently in withdrawal: abstinent for at least 7 days and no more than 30 days.
  • At least mild cognitive impairment, as measured by the BEARNI scale (mild impairment on the global scale or score below the threshold on at least one of the subtests).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Guardianship.
  • Simultaneous participation in a cognitive rehabilitation group, an ETP programme or a mindfulness meditation group.
  • Presence of unstabilised psychiatric or addictive comorbidity. The notion of instability is assessed over the past month and is defined by: (i) the need to introduce a new psychotropic treatment, (ii) the need to increase the dosage of an existing psychotropic treatment, (iii) the need for hospitalisation. Given the profile of the patients sought, the start of psychotropic treatment or hospitalisation to support alcohol withdrawal will not be considered exclusion criteria.
  • Presence of neurodegenerative disease, Korsakoff's syndrome, mental retardation, or any other condition that may significantly interfere with the completion of assessments, as determined by the clinician.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: R'COMET treatment program (cognitive remediation program)

The program will include 10 weekly sessions in an open group format to facilitate the patient's engagement in the treatment program (the patient may join the group at any time). The sessions will last 2 hours, ideally with 4-5 patients per session.

Each session will include group and/or individual cognitive exercises to encourage interaction and the sharing of experiences, while also providing individualized and tailored support for each participant. Every cognitive exercise will be approached from a motivational perspective. The exercises offered during the sessions will be combined with systematic verbalization of strategies and emotional states, as well as psychoeducational, body-based, non-verbal communication, and cognitive-behavioral techniques. The proposed strategies will draw on both retrieval and compensatory approaches depending on the individual profiles.

A progress booklet will be given to the patient.

The program will include 10 weekly sessions in an open group format to facilitate the patient's engagement in the treatment program (the patient may join the group at any time). The sessions will last 2 hours, ideally with 4-5 patients per session.

Each session will include group and/or individual cognitive exercises to encourage interaction and the sharing of experiences, while also providing individualized and tailored support for each participant. Every cognitive exercise will be approached from a motivational perspective. The exercises offered during the sessions will be combined with systematic verbalization of strategies and emotional states, as well as psychoeducational, body-based, non-verbal communication, and cognitive-behavioral techniques. The proposed strategies will draw on both retrieval and compensatory approaches depending on the individual profiles.

Active Comparator: Relaxation control program
The relaxation program consists of 10 weekly sessions lasting 2 hours, held in open groups of 4 to 5 participants. Each session follows a flexible structure with several phases: a welcome moment where participants identify and express their feelings, a musical listening period to help them settle into the session, and a self-massage activity to promote bodily awareness. This is followed by a guided relaxation phase-either passive or active-to encourage physical and mental release. At the end of the session, a different breathing exercise is introduced each week so participants can discover which technique suits them best. The session concludes with a verbalization period, allowing everyone to share their sensations and impressions in a supportive, non-judgmental environment. Participants are encouraged to practice the exercises independently as well .
The relaxation program consists of 10 weekly sessions lasting 2 hours, held in open groups of 4 to 5 participants. Each session follows a flexible structure with several phases: a welcome moment where participants identify and express their feelings, a musical listening period to help them settle into the session, and a self-massage activity to promote bodily awareness. This is followed by a guided relaxation phase-either passive or active-to encourage physical and mental release. At the end of the session, a different breathing exercise is introduced each week so participants can discover which technique suits them best. The session concludes with a verbalization period, allowing everyone to share their sensations and impressions in a supportive, non-judgmental environment. Participants are encouraged to practice the exercises independently as well .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in General Self-Efficacy (SGSES-fr)
Time Frame: 6 months

The primary outcome measure will be the change in the overall score on the SGSES-fr scale between the pre-treatment assessment (V1) and the immediate post-treatment assessment (V2). The advantage of this scale over other self-efficacy scales is that it is not linked to specific situations or behaviors, but represents a general measure.

The minimum value is 10 and the maximum value is 40. 10 is a high outcome 40 is a low outcome It is expected that this score will increase between V1 and V2.

6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Leslie TOUATI-HUREAU, Nantes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 15, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on cognitive remediation group

Subscribe