- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07473947
Performance and Safety Follow-up of Bioabsorbable Headless Inion CompressOnTM Screws in the Fixation of Bone Fractures in Ankle, Knee and Elbow of Pediatric and Adolescent Patients
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study in question is a post market clinical follow-up study to follow-up the safety and performance of the bioabsorbable headless Inion CompressOn Screw in fracture fixation operations of the ankle, knee and elbow of pediatric and adolescent patients. The main focus of the study in terms of performance is to follow-up the bone healing/ossification of operated areas. The main focus of the study in terms of safety is to evaluate the occurrence of adverse events and required revision surgeries that are or might be related to the study device.
The Inion CompressOn™ Screws are cannulated headless compression screws made of degradable co-polymers composed of L-lactic acid and D-lactic acid. These polymers have a long history of safe medical use and they degrade in vivo by hydrolysis into alpha-hydroxyacids that are metabolised by the body. The screws retain their initial strength up to 12 weeks after implantation and gradually lose their strength thereafter. Bioabsorption takes place within four years.
The clinical data collection acquired from this study is a requirement of the EU Notified Body as part of the admitted CE mark certification, in cases when the device is initially approved based on the clinical data of an equivalent device. In this case, the equivalent device has been Inion FreedomScrew, which is made of the same material composition and is used for the same indications. Inion CompressOn Screw has new design features such as headless design, and threading which allows compression to the fracture line. Also new sizes have been introduced.
The study recruits 80 pediatric/adolescent patients who meet the acceptance criteria and have signed the informed consent. The follow-up time for each study patient is 4 years. Each patient has 6 follow-up time points related to the study. These time points consist of:
- screening visit (-180-0 days before operation),
- operation (day 0),
- post-operative follow-up 1 (4-8 weeks),
- post-operative follow-up 2 (3 months after operation +/- 3 weeks),
- post-operative follow-up 3 (2 years after operation +/- 2 months)
- post-operative follow-up 4 (4 years after operation +/- 4 months) The first 4 time points are within standard care, the last 2 time points (post-operative follow-up 3 and post-operative follow-up 4) are scheduled for study purposes only to be able to gain performance and safety data based on adequate follow-up time.
The study is a single center single group study which is conducted in Turku University Hospital (TYKS) in Finland.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Kati Marttinen
- Phone Number: +358 40 841 6217
- Email: kati.marttinen@inion.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Marika Manni, MD
- Phone Number: +358503669994
- Email: marika.manni@inion.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Turku, Finland, 20520
- Recruiting
- Turku University Hospital/Lighthouse hospital
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Johanna Syvänen, MD
-
Contact:
- Olli Pajulo, MD
- Phone Number: +358 2 313 0000
- Email: olli.pajulo@varha.fi
-
Principal Investigator:
- Olli Pajulo, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Informed consent signed by parents or legal guardians, and assent from the child if of appropriate age and cognitive ability < 18 years 3. Suitable and in need for an operation indicated for subject device 4. Ability to give adequate input for the PROM questionnaires 5. Willingness and ability to comply with rehabilitation instructions. 6. Availability for follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active infection
- Patient conditions including limited blood supply (e.g. patients with severe circulatory disorder of the lower or upper limb)
- Patient conditions including insufficient quality or quantity of bone (diagnosed osteoporosis, conditions causing secondary osteoporosis e.g. diabetes, rheumatism, eating disorder)
- Patient conditions where patient cooperation cannot be guaranteed (alcohol use, drug abuse etc.)
- Patients with known allergy to the implant constituents or its degradation products.
- Spinal and craniomaxillofacial indications.
- High-load bearing indications (e.g., diaphyseal fractures of long bones) unless used in conjunction with traditional rigid fixation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: CompressOn group
Participants undergo a surgical fracture fixation procedure using the bioabsorbable Inion CompressOn Screw according to the device instructions for use.
|
Fracture fixation operation in using bioabsorbable headless Inion CompressOn Screw/s according to instructions for use
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Occurrence of revision surgeries
Time Frame: During 4-year follow-up
|
Assessment of occurrence of revision surgeries related to study device
|
During 4-year follow-up
|
|
Bone healing (ossification) of the fracture line(s)
Time Frame: Change from operation to 4 years
|
X-ray evaluation of bone healing (ossification) of the fracture line(s)
|
Change from operation to 4 years
|
|
Occurrence of device-related adverse events
Time Frame: During 4-year follow-up
|
Assessment of occurrence of adverse events (AE), that are or might be related to the study device such as non-union of bone, fixation failure, mechanical irritation and tissue reactions related to implant bioabsorption
|
During 4-year follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Subjective functionality of the operated limb (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 years
|
Evaluation of subjective pain of the operated area during follow-up.
10-cm (100-mm) horizontal line used to measure pain intensity, ranging from "no pain" (0) to "worst imaginable pain" (100 mm)
|
Change from baseline to 4 years
|
|
Subjective functionality of the operated area (Lower Extremity Functional Scale, LEFS/Upper Extremity Functional Index, UEFI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 4 years
|
Evaluation of subjective functionality of the operated area follow-up. UEFI: The scores given to the 20 questions are added to give a highest possible score of 80. The lowest possible score is 0. A lower score indicates that the person is reporting increased difficulty with the activities as a result of their upper limb condition. LEFS: Contains 20 questions about a person's ability to perform everyday tasks. The maximum score is 80. The lower the score the greater the disability. |
Change from baseline to 4 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Olli Pajulo, MD, Turku University Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CompressOn2-2025
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ankle Fractures
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...AO Trauma North AmericaCompletedDisplaced Ankle FracturesUnited States
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
-
Shaikh Zayed Hospital, LahoreCompletedBimalleolar Ankle FracturePakistan
-
University of ArizonaActive, not recruitingUnstable Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic DisruptionUnited States
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityBauerfeindNot yet recruitingAnkle Fracture | Ankle ArthrodesisCanada
-
Sohag UniversityRecruitingFragility Ankle Fractures and Complex Distal Tibial FracturesEgypt
-
Encore Medical, L.P.RecruitingBimalleolar Ankle FracturesUnited States
-
Utku GürhanNot yet recruitingAnkle Injuries | Ankle FracturesCyprus, Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Brian W. NoehrenRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Fracture fixation operation
-
Zimmer BiometRecruiting
-
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing...CompletedPosterior Malleolus FracturesChina
-
Oxford University Hospitals NHS TrustCompletedCondylar Process of Mandible Open FractureUnited Kingdom
-
Aesculap AGCompletedThoracic Fracture | Lumbar FractureGermany
-
Balgrist University HospitalUniversity of ZurichTerminatedFracture of Clavicle | Fracture of Femur | Fracture of Humerus | Fracture of Ulna Radius | Fracture of Hand | Fracture of Pelvis | Fracture of Tibia Fibula | Fracture of SkullSwitzerland
-
OrthoMediTecSuspended
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingAnkle Injuries | Ankle Fractures | Arthroscopic Surgery
-
Unity Health TorontoNYU Langone Health; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Oregon Health and Science University and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterMedtronicCompletedLumbar Vertebral FractureUnited States
-
Fundación Universidad Católica de Valencia San...CompletedPertrochanteric Fracture of Femur | Unstable Throchanteric Hip FracturesSpain