Tato stránka byla automaticky přeložena a přesnost překladu není zaručena. Podívejte se prosím na anglická verze pro zdrojový text.

Mindfulness Therapy for Individuals With Lung Cancer

14. listopadu 2014 aktualizováno: Rebecca Lehto, Michigan State University

A Mindfulness Intervention for Symptom Management in Lung Cancer

Managing psychological and physical symptoms to improve quality of life in patients with lung cancer are a major public health concern. Mindfulness-based therapies are showing promise in modifying psychological distress and improving quality of life in some cancer groups, but little testing has included lung cancer samples. Mindfulness-based therapies integrate meditation, breathing, and gentle yoga practices to promote an attitude of nonjudgmental acceptance and awareness of bodily states. Such strategies may promote well being, self-regulation, and symptom management. The study purpose was to test the acceptability, feasibility, and symptom / health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes of a home-based mindfulness intervention for individuals with advanced lung cancer during non-curative treatment (radiation and/or chemotherapy). Acceptability and feasibility were measured via patient consent and retention rates, therapy expectancy, study adherence, attrition reasons, and quality assurance indicators. Efficacy was determined via symptom and HRQOL (health perceptions, physical and emotional function) outcomes. 40 patients undergoing treatment of non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to receive either six weekly mindfulness sessions (N=20) or an attention control condition (N=20). Outcome data was obtained at baseline (Time 1), post-intervention (Time 2, week 8), and four weeks after completion (Time 3, week 11). In addition, both groups received weekly symptom assessment interviews. The hypothesis was that the mindfulness group would report better symptom management and HRQOL (lower worry, dyspnea, insomnia, depression; higher physical and social function; more positive health perceptions) than the attention control group at the protocol end and that these differences will be sustained at Time 3.

Přehled studie

Postavení

Dokončeno

Podmínky

Intervence / Léčba

Detailní popis

The final sample (n = 32) included 16 patients in the intervention and 16 in the attention control group (study attrition (n = 8, 20%).

Typ studie

Intervenční

Zápis (Aktuální)

40

Fáze

  • Nelze použít

Kontakty a umístění

Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.

Studijní místa

  • Spojené státy
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, Spojené státy, 60208
        • Northwestern University
    • Michigan
      • East Lansing, Michigan, Spojené státy, 48824
        • Michigan State University
      • Jackson, Michigan, Spojené státy, 49201
        • Allegiance Health

Kritéria účasti

Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.

Kritéria způsobilosti

Věk způsobilý ke studiu

21 let a starší (Dospělý, Starší dospělý)

Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky

Ne

Pohlaví způsobilá ke studiu

Všechno

Popis

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Able to understand and speak English
  2. at least 21 years old
  3. active treatment for a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer
  4. Karnofsky score > 80
  5. have a telephone by which they can be reached

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. current substance abuse other than tobacco
  2. active treatment for psychiatric disorders excluding depression, and/or use of antipsychotic medications that would impede study participation.
  3. cognitive impairment
  4. active participation in mindfulness-based classes, guided imagery, yoga, or relaxation therapy courses
  5. diagnosis of small cell lung cancer

Studijní plán

Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.

Jak je studie koncipována?

Detaily designu

  • Primární účel: Podpůrná péče
  • Přidělení: Randomizované
  • Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
  • Maskování: Singl

Zbraně a zásahy

Skupina účastníků / Arm
Intervence / Léčba
Aktivní komparátor: symptom assessment
6 weeks of symptom assessment phone calls.
Behaviorální: symptom assessment
attention control receives a weekly symptom assessment phone interview for 6 weeks.
Experimentální: Mindfulness intervention
Participants receive 6 weeks of the home-based mindfulness intervention, and weekly symptom assessment phone calls.
Behaviorální: symptom assessment
attention control receives a weekly symptom assessment phone interview for 6 weeks.
Behaviorální: Mindfulness Intervention
Participants will receive a weekly home-based mindfulness intervention, and symptom assessment phone interviews for 6 weeks.

Co je měření studie?

Primární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI)
Časové okno: Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.
Symptom Severity and interference were measured with the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) . The MDASI is a multisymptom patient-reported outcome measure. The MDASI has 13 core items include symptoms found to have the highest frequency and/or severity in patients with various cancers and treatment types (pain, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, disturbed sleep, distress, shortness of breath, memory difficulties, lack of appetite, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness,numbness and tingling. Patients rate the severity of each symptom "at its worst" using 0-10 numerical rating scales with 0 = "not present" and 10 = "as bad as you can imagine." The measure includes 5 symptom interference items which ask how much all symptoms, interfere with domains (walking, work, general activity, mood, relations with others, enjoyment of life) also rated on a 0-10 scale (0 = "did not interfere"; 10 = "interfered completely"). The 13 severity (range 0 - 130) and 5 interference items (range 0 - 50) are summed.
Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.
SF-36
Časové okno: Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.
Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Indices (Physical/Emotional Function, Role Function, Pain, General Health, Vitality, Mental/Physical Health)HRQOL(SF-36) calculated using Quality Metric, Inc. an algorithm producing normal scores (1-100 range). With normed scoring, general population has mean=50, SD=10. For the minimum and maximum values in each of the scale ranges provided, higher values represent a better outcome.
Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.

Další výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D)
Časové okno: Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.
The score is the sum of the 20 questions. Each item has a range of 1 - 4 for frequency of a behavior or mental state in the past week ; 1 - Rarely or none of the time (less than 1 day); 2 = Some or a little of the time (1-2 days); 3 = Occasionally or a moderate amount of time (3-4 days); 4 = Most or all of the time (5-7 days). Possible range is 0-60. There are 4 reverse-scored items (questions 4, 8, 12, and 16). A score of 16 points or more is considered depressed.
Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.
Cancer Dyspnea Scale
Časové okno: Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.

The cancer dyspnea scale (CDS) has 12 Likert scale items ( 1 = Not at all, 5 = Very much) that ask questions about breathlessness or difficulty in breathing during the past few days. The CDS has an overall score (range 0-42) and 3 subscales that measure the amount of effort with breathing, anxiety associated with breathing, and discomfort associated with breathing.

The 3 subscales are calculated by: 1) effort (items 4+6+8+10+12) - 5 [range 0 (no dyspnea effort)-20 (worst dyspnea effort)]; 2) anxiety (items 5+7+9+11) - 4 [range 0 (no dyspnea anxiety) - 16 (worst dyspnea anxiety)]; 3) discomfort [15 - (items 1+2+3) {range 0 (no dyspnea discomfort) - 12 (worst dyspnea discomfort)}]. The total dyspnea score is derived by adding the total subscale scores. The subscale score subtractions are to make adjustments for 0 as a state of absence of dyspnea (thus total dyspnea summary scores range from 0 to 42).
Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.
Worry (Cancer-related and General)
Časové okno: Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.
Both cancer-related and general worry were measured with 3 item scales. Cancer-related worry had three statements asking about level of worry related to diagnosis, treatment, and worry interference using a 1 = "not at all" to 5 = "most or all the time" scale, range 3-15. Items are summed. General worry used an abbreviated brief Penn State Worry questionnaire with 3 statements that measure how typical that statements are in describing the person. Uses a 3 item scale with 1 = "not at all typical" to 5 = "very typical". the range is 3-15. Items are summed.
Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.
Pittsburgh Sleep Symptom Questionnaire-Insomnia (PSSQ_I)
Časové okno: Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.
The PSSQ_I has 13 self rated questions. The first 5 items, used to determine sleep quality (presence; frequency of insomnia problems) are rated [0 = never to 5 = always, 5-7 days per week; (range 0-25)] and items 6 to 13 are aimed at identifying the degree of interference experienced from sleep impairment (rated 0=not at all to 4=extremely on Likert scale; range 0 - 32).
Time 2 (week 8), Time 3 (week 11), and overall average for group comparisons.
Baseline Values for All Measures.
Časové okno: Baseline.
Description of all measures are described elsewhere. Provided are the means and standard deviations for baseline comparisons.
Baseline.

Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé

Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.

Sponzor

Michigan State University

Vyšetřovatelé

  • Vrchní vyšetřovatel: Rebecca Lehto, PhD, Michigan State University

Publikace a užitečné odkazy

Osoba odpovědná za zadávání informací o studiu tyto publikace poskytuje dobrovolně. Mohou se týkat čehokoli, co souvisí se studiem.

Obecné publikace

Termíny studijních záznamů

Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.

Hlavní termíny studia

Začátek studia

1. března 2012

Primární dokončení (Aktuální)

1. června 2013

Dokončení studie (Aktuální)

1. června 2013

Termíny zápisu do studia

První předloženo

22. března 2012

První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality

27. března 2012

První zveřejněno (Odhad)

29. března 2012

Aktualizace studijních záznamů

Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Odhad)

17. listopadu 2014

Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality

14. listopadu 2014

Naposledy ověřeno

1. listopadu 2014

Více informací

Termíny související s touto studií

Klíčová slova

Další relevantní podmínky MeSH

Další identifikační čísla studie

  • CTSI grant

Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .

Klinické studie na Rakovina plic

Klinické studie na symptom assessment

Prohledejte podobné pokusy

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

CROs by country

CROs in Bahrain

Podmínky

Vzácné nemoci

Drogové intervence

Doplňky stravy

Sponzor / Spolupracovníci

Místa

3
Předplatit