- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT01986946
Epidural Analgesia Versus IV Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Fusions
10. januar 2017 opdateret af: Duke University
A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia With Standard Care Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Study
- Protocol Title - A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia with Standard Care Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Study
- Purpose of the Study - This prospective randomized study will enroll 200 patients undergoing elective Lumbar Spinal Fusion at Duke University Hospital. The primary objective is to determine the effect of epidural analgesia, as compared with standard care, on post-operative analgesia.
Hypothesis:
The investigators hypothesize that patients undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion surgery with epidural catheter placement will have superior post-operative analgesia compared to patients undergoing standard care.
Studieoversigt
Status
Afsluttet
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Undersøgelsestype
Interventionel
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
17
Fase
- Fase 3
Kontakter og lokationer
Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.
Studiesteder
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, Forenede Stater, 27710
- Duke University Hospital
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ingen
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients who are scheduled for elective Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Baseline cognitive deficits sufficient to make objective pain self-assessments unreliable in the estimation of the Study Investigators.
- Inability to follow directions or comprehend the English language.
- Females who are pregnant as determined by positive pregnancy test on or before the day of surgery.
- Prisoners.
- Patient refusal to provide informed consent.
- Allergy to amide local anesthetics (lidocaine, bupivacaine, ropivacaine).
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: Intravenous opioids
This is the standard of care method for post-operative analgesia following lumbar spine fusion surgery.
Participants randomly assigned to this arm will receive Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IVPCA) with dilaudid (or other opioid) for post-operative pain control.
|
Patients in this arm will receive intravenous patient-controlled opioid analgesia (Dilaudid).
|
|
Eksperimentel: Epidural Catheter
The intervention to be tested in this study against standard intravenous opioids is infusion of local anesthetic and dilaudid via epidural catheter for post-operative pain control in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery.
|
Placement of an epidural catheter to administer local anesthetic and opioid (dilaudid) to the epidural space will be studied as compared to use of intravenous opioid (dilaudid) for pain control following lumbar spine fusion surgery.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-operative Pain as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Tidsramme: Postoperative day 1
|
The VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100 mm with the lower score indicating less pain and the higher score indicating greater pain.
|
Postoperative day 1
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Perioperative Analgesia
Tidsramme: Post-operative Day 1
|
Patients will be assessed for satisfaction with their peri-operative analgesia in the recovery room and each day of their epidural infusion or intravenous opioid infusion by the Acute Pain Service, and at their surgical follow-up visit.
Likert scale ranges from 1 to 5 (1=very satisfied and 5=Very Dissatisfied).
|
Post-operative Day 1
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Perioperative Analgesia
Tidsramme: 6-Week Follow up Visit
|
Patients will be assessed for satisfaction with their peri-operative analgesia in the recovery room and each day of their epidural infusion or intravenous opioid infusion by the Acute Pain Service, and at their surgical follow-up visit.
Likert scale ranges from 1 to 5 (1=very satisfied and 5=Very Dissatisfied).
|
6-Week Follow up Visit
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Overall Care
Tidsramme: 6-Week Follow up Visit
|
Likert scale ranges from 1 to 5 (1=very satisfied and 5=Very Dissatisfied).
|
6-Week Follow up Visit
|
|
Number of Participants With Events of Special Interest
Tidsramme: Post-operative Day 30
|
Patients will be assessed for development of a deep vein thrombosis after surgery, and surgical site infection.
|
Post-operative Day 30
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Related to the Study
Tidsramme: 6-week Follow up Visit
|
Patients will be assessed in the recovery room and each day of their epidural or intravenous opioid infusions, and at their surgical follow-up visit.
|
6-week Follow up Visit
|
|
Total Post-operative Opioid Consumption
Tidsramme: during hospitalization (approximately 3-8 days)
|
during hospitalization (approximately 3-8 days)
|
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Delirium
Tidsramme: Post-operative Day 1
|
Post-operative Day 1
|
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Delirium
Tidsramme: Post-operative Day 2
|
Post-operative Day 2
|
|
|
Number of Participants Experiencing Delirium
Tidsramme: Post-operative Day 3
|
Post-operative Day 3
|
|
|
Number of Participants Readmitted to Hospital Within 30 Days of Surgery
Tidsramme: Post-operative Day 30
|
Post-operative Day 30
|
|
|
Length of Hospital Stay
Tidsramme: during hospitalization (approximately 3-8 days)
|
during hospitalization (approximately 3-8 days)
|
|
|
Wound Infection Rates
Tidsramme: during hospitalization (approximately 3-8 days)
|
during hospitalization (approximately 3-8 days)
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Sponsor
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: Erin L Manning, MD/PhD, Duke University Hospital Department of Anesthesiology
- Ledende efterforsker: Carlos Bagley, MD, Duke University Hospital Department of Neurosurgery
Publikationer og nyttige links
Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.
Generelle publikationer
- Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2455-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2455.
- Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, Terashima T, Horie Y. A prospective randomized study of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain in the patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: continuous subcutaneous morphine, continuous epidural morphine, and diclofenac sodium. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):2357-61. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000184377.31427.fa.
- Cohen BE, Hartman MB, Wade JT, Miller JS, Gilbert R, Chapman TM. Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion. Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Aug 15;22(16):1892-6; discussion 1896-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199708150-00016.
- Abrishamkar S, Eshraghi N, Feizi A, Talakoub R, Rafiei A, Rahmani P. Analgesic effects of ketamine infusion on postoperative pain after fusion and instrumentation of the lumbar spine: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Med Arh. 2012;66(2):107-10. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2012.66.107-110.
- Sekar C, Rajasekaran S, Kannan R, Reddy S, Shetty TA, Pithwa YK. Preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief in lumbosacral spine surgeries: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):261-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.11.009.
- Sucato DJ, Duey-Holtz A, Elerson E, Safavi F. Postoperative analgesia following surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 15;30(2):211-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000150832.53604.64.
- Parker SL, Lerner J, McGirt MJ. Effect of minimally invasive technique on return to work and narcotic use following transforaminal lumbar inter-body fusion: a review. Prof Case Manag. 2012 Sep-Oct;17(5):229-35. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0b013e3182529c05.
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart
1. oktober 2013
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
1. september 2015
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
1. september 2015
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
3. januar 2013
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
12. november 2013
Først opslået (Skøn)
19. november 2013
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
23. februar 2017
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
10. januar 2017
Sidst verificeret
1. januar 2017
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- Pro00041252
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .
Kliniske forsøg med Smerte
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaRekrutteringPatellofemoral Pain, PfpTyrkiet (Türkiye)
-
Pamukkale UniversityIkke rekrutterer endnuPatellofemoral Pain, PfpTyrkiet (Türkiye)
-
Beijing Sport UniversityAfsluttetPatellofemoral Pain, PfpKina
-
Beijing Sport UniversityIkke rekrutterer endnuPatellofemoral Pain, Pfp
-
Beijing Sport UniversityIkke rekrutterer endnu
-
Sahmyook UniversityAfsluttetMyofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS)Sydkorea
-
Camilo Jose Cela UniversityAfsluttetMyofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS)Spanien
-
Izmir Tinaztepe UniversityEge UniversityIkke rekrutterer endnuRygliggende stilling | FLACC Skala | Behavioral Pain Scale
-
University of California, DavisNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Center for Complementary...Ikke rekrutterer endnuKronisk lænderygsmerter (cLBP) | Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS)Forenede Stater
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)AfsluttetPatellofemoralt smertesyndrom | Patellofemoral smerte (PFPS) | Patellofemoral smerte | Patellofemoral Pain, PfpForenede Stater
Kliniske forsøg med Dilaudid
-
TriHealth Inc.AfsluttetPostoperative smerterForenede Stater
-
Alza Corporation, DE, USAAfsluttet
-
Gilead SciencesAfsluttetRheumatoid arthritisUngarn, Tjekkiet
-
Alza Corporation, DE, USAAfsluttet
-
Montefiore Medical CenterAfsluttetAkut smerteForenede Stater
-
Albert Einstein College of MedicineAfsluttet
-
Columbia UniversityAfsluttetSmerteForenede Stater
-
Montefiore Medical CenterAfsluttet
-
Northwestern UniversityTrukket tilbageSmerte | Ventilatorisk depressionForenede Stater
-
Montefiore Medical CenterAfsluttet