Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Ankle Robot to Reduce Foot Drop in Stroke

8 de mayo de 2020 actualizado por: VA Office of Research and Development

Adaptive Ankle Robot Control System to Reduce Foot-drop in Chronic Stroke

Deficits in ankle control after stroke can lead to foot drop, resulting in inefficient, aberrant gait and an elevated falls risk. Using a novel ankle robot and newly invented adaptive control system, this study tests whether robotic-assisted treadmill training will improve gait and balance functions in chronic stroke survivors with foot drop impairment. It is hypothesized that, compared to treadmill training alone, integrating adaptive ankle robotics with treadmill training will reduce drop foot during independent overground walking, resulting in greater mobility, improved postural control, and reduced fall risk.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

This proposal investigates a novel ankle robot (anklebot) adaptive control approach integrated with treadmill training to reduce foot drop and improve mobility function in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Currently, stroke survivors with foot drop are trained to live with a cane or other assistive device, and often ankle foot orthotics (AFOs) for safety. Neither mediates task-practice or neuromotor recovery.

The investigators have developed an adaptive anklebot controller that detects gait cycle sub-events for precise timing of graded robotics assistance to enable deficit severity-adjusted ankle motor learning in the context of walking. The investigators' pilot findings show that 6 weeks treadmill training with anklebot (TMR) timed to assist swing phase dorsiflexion only is more effective than treadmill alone (TM) to improve free-walking swing dorsiflexion at foot strike, floor-walking speed, and the benefits are retained at 6 weeks post-training. Notably, swing-phase TMR training improved paretic leg push-off, and reduced center-of-pressure sway on standing balance, indicating potential benefits to other elements of gait and balance, beyond those robotically targeted toward foot drop.

This randomized study investigates the hypothesis that 6 weeks TMR is more effective to improve durably gait biomechanics, static, and dynamic balance, and mobility function in chronic stroke survivors with dorsiflexion deficits, compared to TM alone. Aims are to determine the compare effectiveness of 6 weeks TMR vs. TM alone on:

  1. Independent gait function indexed by gait velocity, swing-phase DF (dorsiflexion), terminal stance push-off.
  2. Balance function indexed by measures of postural sway (CoP), asymmetric loading in quiet standing, peak paretic A-P forces in non-paretic gait initiation, and standardized scales for balance and fall risk.
  3. Long-term mobility outcomes, assessed by repeated measures of all key gait and balance outcomes at 6 weeks and 3 months after formal training cessation.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

45

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Estados Unidos
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Estados Unidos, 21201
        • Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke > 2 months prior in men or women
  • Residual hemiparesis of the lower extremity that includes symptoms of foot drop
  • Capable of ambulating on a treadmill with handrail support
  • Already completed all conventional physical therapy
  • Adequate language and cognitive function to provide informed consent and participate in testing and training

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac history of:

    • Unstable angina
    • Recent (< 3 months) myocardial infarction
    • Congestive heart failure (NYHA category II or higher)
    • Hemodynamic valvular dysfunction
    • Hypertension that is a contraindication for a bout of treadmill training (>160/100 mmHg on two assessments)

  • Medical history of:

    • Recent hospitalization (< 3 months) for any serious condition leading to significant bed-rest or reduction in mobility function
    • Symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease
    • Orthopedic or chronic pain conditions restricting exercise
    • Pulmonary failure requiring oxygen
    • Uncompensated renal failure
    • Active cancer

  • Neurological history and exam consistent with:

    • Dementia
    • Receptive or global aphasia that confounds testing and training, operationally defined as unable to follow 2-point commands
    • Non-stroke neurological disorder restricting exercise (e.g. Parkinson's Syndrome, myopathy)
    • Untreated major depression

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Treadmill+anklebot
This group will receive gait training on a treadmill while wearing the anklebot with the adaptive control system.
Dispositivo: Treadmill plus anklebot
This intervention employs the use of the adaptive anklebot control system to complement treadmill exercise training over a 6-week intervention period.
Otros nombres:
  • TMR
Comparador activo: Treadmill only
This group will receive gait training on a treadmill, without use of the anklebot.
Conductual: Treadmill only
This intervention employs the use of a treadmill for gait exercise training over a 6-week intervention period
Otros nombres:
  • TM

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Gait Velocity During Self-selected Overground Walking
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months after completion
Gait velocity during self-selected overground walking measured in cm/sec
Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months after completion
Anterior-posterior Propulsion Forces of Paretic Side During Gait
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline to: Post 6-weeks training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months
Newtons: anterior-posterior force generated during push-off phase of the gait cycle
Change from baseline to: Post 6-weeks training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months
Peak Dorsiflexion Angle During Swing Phase of Gait
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months after completion
Degrees; extent of ankle dorsiflexion to enable foot clearance
Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months after completion
Postural Sway Areas During Quiet Standing
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months
cm^2; extent of postural deviations to assess static postural control
Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months
Ratio of Asymmetric Loading in Quiet Standing
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months
Ratio of Newtons of force per each leg (paretic/nonparetic) while standing quietly
Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months
Peak Paretic Push Off Forces During Gait Initiation
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months
Newtons; magnitude of forward ground reaction forces
Change from baseline to: Post 6-week training, 6 weeks after completion, and 3 (or 6) months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

VA Office of Research and Development

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Steven J Kittner, Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2015

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de abril de 2019

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

30 de junio de 2019

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

19 de junio de 2015

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

24 de junio de 2015

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

29 de junio de 2015

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

20 de mayo de 2020

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

8 de mayo de 2020

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2020

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • N1699-R

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

Sí

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Treadmill plus anklebot

Buscar ensayos similares

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

CROs by country

CROs in Russia

Condiciones

Enfermedades Raras

Intervenciones de drogas

Suplementos dietéticos

Patrocinador / Colaboradores

Localizaciones

3
Suscribir