Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Women's Knowledge and Attitudes to Use of Mesh in Gynaecological Surgery

16 de mayo de 2018 actualizado por: Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

This is a questionnaire study that is being performed to ascertain the knowledge and attitudes of women towards use of mesh in gynaecological surgery. Women over the age of 18, able to read and comprehend the information leaflet, sign and give informed consent will be eligible to participate. Women who are not fluent in English will be able to participate if a translator can convey the information. The trial will be conducted at Epsom and St Helier Hospitals, in the United Kingdom. The investigators aim to recruit 150 women to this study. No power calculation has been performed as this is an exploratory study.

However, previous studies have included 64 and 77 women respectively.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Desconocido

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are common conditions experienced by women. It is estimated that 20% of women undergo surgery for the treatment of prolapse. Transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for repair of POP and SUI are associated with complications such as erosion, infection, dyspareunia, bowel and bladder perforation as well as failure of the operation. Such complications have resulted in the FDA reclassifying transvaginal meshes to high risk medical devices. Most recently, National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom has limited the use of transvaginal meshes for anterior and posterior compartment prolapse to a research context only.

Since the FDA and NICE publications, there has been much controversy and increasing litigation arising from complications of transvaginal mesh use. Recent negative media attention has likely affected patients' perception regarding mesh use in gynaecology. There are no studies assessing the knowledge and perception of mesh use in gynaecological surgery within the United Kingdom. Previous studies have found patients have limited knowledge and often are misinformed. However, these have been limited to transvaginal meshes. Laparoscopic procedures using mesh for POP such as sacrohysteropexy and sacrocolpopexy are become increasingly popular with comparable outcomes to vaginal surgery. The risk of mesh erosion with laparoscopic surgery is less than vaginal placement.

The use of mesh of gynaecology remains a topical issues and given the amount of information available to patients, this concept merits study, as it may influence patients' decision making and therefore a prominent part of the consent process. The use of mesh in gynaecological surgery remains a highly effective method of treating POP and SUI in appropriately selected patients and routes. It is therefore important to understand patients' understanding and perception regarding mesh use and sources of information in the wake of media coverage and attention. The investigators seek to evaluate patients' knowledge and attitudes towards use of mesh in gynaecological surgery presenting to gynaecology clinics.

The investigators aim to survey 150 women attending gynaecology clinics using a questionnaire. A power calculation has not been performed however, similar studies have included 164 and 77 women respectively. The questionnaire consists of 20 questions that should take 10 minutes to complete.

Consent: A valid consent with detailed written information sheet will be sought before including them in this trial.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria: All women attending the clinic will be eligible to participate if they are over the age of 18, with an understanding of English or translator available and able to provide informed consent.

Risks and benefits: All women will receive the same standard of care regardless if they agree to disagree to participate in the trial. There are no disadvantages associated with participation in taking part in the study.

Data storage: All the information obtained from this study will be stored in a confidential manner and will only be available to the researchers for future analysis.Participants can withdraw their consent at any point and this will not affect the standard of care given to them in future.All the information pertaining to the trial will be destroyed securely.

This research does not involve any use, storage of any tissue

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Anticipado)

150

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

N/A

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Femenino

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Women attending gynaecology outpatient clinics at Epsom and St Helier's University Hospitals

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a. Women > 18 years of age attending gynaecology clinics

    b. Able to read and comprehend the details of the study in patient information sheet.

    c. Mentally competent at signing the consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient refusal.
  2. Inability to consent due to a language barrier (no translator available, medication)

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Modelos observacionales: Otro
  • Perspectivas temporales: Futuro

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
Women attending gynaecology clinics

150 women attending gynaecology clinics that fulfil inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria:

Inclusion criteria

  1. Over the age of 18
  2. attending gynaecology clinics
  3. Able to read and comprehend the details of the study in patient information sheet.
  4. Mentally competent at signing the consent form.
  5. English -speaking, if not then translator available

Questionnaire of 20 items evaluating attitudes and perception of mesh use in gynaecological surgery. Questionnaire will take 10 minutes to complete. For non-English speaking patients a translator will be sought, where feasible to help women complete the questionnaire.

Participation will be entirely voluntary and also the questionnaire will be piloted to ensure that questions asked are clear and concise. Questionnaire is anonymised and does not contain patient identifying information thereby eliminating breach of confidentiality.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Women's Knowledge and Attitudes to Use of Mesh in Gynaecological Surgery
Periodo de tiempo: Duration of study, 12 months
Assessed by use of questionnaire
Duration of study, 12 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Anticipado)

1 de julio de 2018

Finalización primaria (Anticipado)

1 de marzo de 2019

Finalización del estudio (Anticipado)

1 de julio de 2019

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

4 de mayo de 2018

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de mayo de 2018

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

16 de mayo de 2018

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

18 de mayo de 2018

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

16 de mayo de 2018

Última verificación

1 de enero de 2018

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • IRAS ID 241922

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Prolapso Vaginal

3
Suscribir