- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT01348802
A Randomized Trial Comparing "Push" Versus "Pull" Technology for Mobilizing Pain Evidence Into Practice Across Different Health Professions
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
The Problem: Pain affects all Canadians during acute injury or disease. Chronic noncancer pain affects 29% of Canadians, half of whom are unable to participate in their usual work/social roles. Pain is the primary reason that patients consult health practitioners. Research has shown the benefits, harms, and costs of numerous interventions for pain, but uptake of this knowledge is far from satisfactory. Optimizing pain care requires ready access and use of best evidence within and across different disciplines and settings.
The Research Question: The purpose of this randomized trial is to determine whether a technology-based "push" of new, high-quality pain research to physicians, nurses, rehabilitation and psychology professionals results in better knowledge and clinical decision-making around pain, when offered in addition to traditional "pull" evidence technology. A secondary objective is to identify disciplinary variations in response to evidence and differences in the patterns of accessing research evidence.
The Study Sample: 670 Physicians, nurses, occupational/physical therapists and psychologists ((80/group X 2 comparison groups X 4 disciplines) + 30 for dropouts)will be recruited through professional associations, websites/conferences and social media. This provides > 90% power to detect main effects; 80% power for subgroup effects.
Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes are uptake and application of evidence. Uptake will be determined by embedded tracking of what research is accessed during use of the intervention. A random subset of 30 participants/discipline will undergo chart-stimulated recall (CSR) to assess the nature and depth of evidence utilization in actual case management (0, 9 months). A different random subset of 30 participants/discipline will be tested for their skills in accessing evidence using a standardized simulation test (final 3 months). Secondary outcomes include usage and self-reported evidence-based practice attitudes and behaviours (0, 3, 9, 15, 18 months).
Intervention/Methods: Participants who agree to this study of a free literature service will be randomly allocated to Push + Pull versus Pull evidence support. Push + Pull is evidence on pain that is extracted from medical, nursing and rehabilitation journals and appraised for quality and relevance and sent out to clinicians (derived from the successful MacPLUS/Evidence Updates), delivered by e-mail alerts or available for searches of the accumulated database). Pull will be an intervention with a similar front-face but requires clinicians to go to the site and extract evidence from an electronic database. The trial will begin with a 3-month (repeated) baseline, during which average participant use of the standard PULL resource will be monitored. Participants will then be randomly allocated to receive PUSH + PULL or continue to use the PULL resource. After six months, participants will cross over to the alternate intervention for an additional six months. To complete the trial, both groups will finish with three months of PUSH + PULL access.
Analyses: The investigators will use an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), where discipline and setting are covariates to assess differential responses across main effects of Push + Pull vs. Pull. Content analysis of the CSR interview will be use to describe the application of evidence within actual cases.
Impact/Timeliness: The trial will inform our understanding on information preferences and behaviours across disciplines/practice settings. If this intervention is effective, sustained support will come through professional/health system initiatives emerging to optimize pain management in Canada.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 1C7
- McMaster University
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- licensed physicians, nurses, occupational therapists (OT), physical therapists (PT), or psychologists who see patients at least 1 day/week;
- fluent in English;
- have access to a computer at home or at work which has unrestricted access to the World Wide Web,
- have an active email account
Exclusion Criteria:
- currently participating in other knowledge translation interventions
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione incrociata
- Mascheramento: Doppio
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
---|---|
Sperimentale: Push + Pull
Push + Pull is evidence on pain that is extracted from medical, nursing, psychology and rehabilitation journals, appraised for quality and relevance, and delivered to clinicians by e-mail alerts or available for searches of the accumulated database.
|
Push + Pull is evidence on pain that is extracted from medical, nursing, psychology and rehabilitation journals, appraised for quality and relevance, and delivered to clinicians by e-mail alerts or available for searches of the accumulated database.
|
Comparatore placebo: Pull
Pull will be an intervention with a similar front-face but requires clinicians to go to the site and extract evidence from an electronic database.
|
Pull will be an intervention with a similar front-face but requires clinicians to go to the site and extract evidence from an electronic database.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
---|---|---|
Application of evidence (chart-stimulated recall)
Lasso di tempo: 0, 9 months
|
A random subset of 30 participants/discipline will undergo chart-stimulated recall to assess the nature and depth of evidence utilization in actual case management.
|
0, 9 months
|
Skill at accessing research evidence
Lasso di tempo: 15 months
|
A different random subset of 30 participants/discipline will be tested for their skills in accessing evidence using a standardized simulation test.
|
15 months
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
---|---|---|
Usage of PainPLUS
Lasso di tempo: Every month
|
Embedded tracking of number/frequency of article access and type of evidence.
Level of satisfaction with PainPLUS
|
Every month
|
Attitudes about Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire
Lasso di tempo: 0, 3, 9, 15, and 18 months
|
Knowledge/Attitude/Behaviour Questionnaire
|
0, 3, 9, 15, and 18 months
|
Familiarity/Access to Technology
Lasso di tempo: 0 months
|
0 months
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Collaboratori
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Joy MacDermid, PhD, McMaster University
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- MacDermid JC, Law M, Buckley N, Haynes RB. "Push" versus "Pull" for mobilizing pain evidence into practice across different health professions: a protocol for a randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2012 Nov 24;7:115. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-115.
- Arumugam V, MacDermid JC, Walton D, Grewal R. The yield and usefulness of PAIN+ and PubMed databases for accessing research evidence on pain management: a randomized crossover trial. Arch Physiother. 2021 Apr 1;11(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00100-7.
Collegamenti utili
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Stima)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Stima)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- CIHR-228972
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Dolore
-
University of OklahomaThe Children's Hospital at OU Medical CenterCompletatoDolore addominale funzionale | Crisi falciforme | Pazienti seguiti dal Pain Team
Prove cliniche su Push + Pull
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNational Heart Centre SingaporeCompletato
-
McMaster Children's HospitalRegional Medical Associates of HamiltonCompletatoShock | Fluidoterapia | Pediatria | RianimazioneCanada
-
University of MichiganCompletatoUso di sostanzeStati Uniti
-
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University HospitalCompletatoTasso di infezione peristomale | Sanguinamento post-intervento | Tasso di mortalità post-interventoGermania
-
Assiut UniversitySconosciuto
-
Lorenzo CamelliniCompletato
-
Unity Health TorontoAttivo, non reclutanteMalattie gastrointestinali | Sanguinamento gastrointestinale oscuro | Sanguinamento gastrointestinale | Angiodisplasia IntestinoCanada
-
University of AlbertaEssity Hygiene and Health ABReclutamento
-
HealthTech Connex Inc.Completato
-
Maharishi Markendeswar University (Deemed to be...Completato