- ICH GCP
- Rejestr badań klinicznych w USA
- Badanie kliniczne NCT04831853
Self- Versus Conventional-swabbing for COVID-19 Screening (COVISWAB) (COVISWAB)
Comparison for Sensitivity and Tolerance of Self-swabbing and Conventional Nasopharyngeal Swabbing for SARS-CoV-2 Detection for Pain, Discomfort and Acceptability: a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Study
Self-swabbing requires less personal protective equipment and could allow to test more people and even to do quick self-diagnosis if antigenic tests are available.
In a preliminary study on 190 medical students, the investigators have shown that self and conventional swabbing were identically well-accepted with equivalent level of pain and discomfort induced by swabbing. In a sub-group of this sample, the investigators have shown that the quality of the 2 sampling methods were equivalent.
The goal of this large study in the general population is to confirm these findings in an adequately powered study. Such results would allow to develop self-swabbing for large screening campaigns and eventually self-diagnosis using antigenic tests.
Przegląd badań
Status
Warunki
Szczegółowy opis
All consecutive subjects coming to the 2 dedicated centers for COVID-19 screening in Clermont-Ferrand University hospital (one for medical students and one for the general population) will be asked to be included in the present study. They will be randomly assigned to either supervised self-swabbing followed by conventional swabbing led by a healthcare professional or the other way round.
All the subjects will have to complete a brief questionnaire including demographical characteristics (age, sex, height, weight, eye color), potential symptoms (asthenia, fever, anosmia…) anticipated pain and discomfort and previous nasopharyngeal swabbing experience. Pain, discomfort and overall acceptability of the procedure will be completed just after completion of the swabbing.
Typ studiów
Zapisy (Oczekiwany)
Faza
- Nie dotyczy
Kontakty i lokalizacje
Lokalizacje studiów
-
-
-
Clermont-Ferrand, Francja, 63000
- CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
-
-
Kryteria uczestnictwa
Kryteria kwalifikacji
Wiek uprawniający do nauki
Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników
Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki
Opis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any subject coming for nasopharyngeal swabbing for SARS-CoV-2 screening
- Fluent in French (both oral and written)
- Able to give an eclaired consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contra-indication to nasopharyngeal swabbing
- Refusal to participate
- Pregnant women
Plan studiów
Jak projektuje się badanie?
Szczegóły projektu
- Główny cel: Diagnostyczny
- Przydział: Randomizowane
- Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
- Maskowanie: Brak (otwarta etykieta)
Broń i interwencje
Grupa uczestników / Arm |
Interwencja / Leczenie |
---|---|
Eksperymentalny: Supervised self-swabbing followed by conventional swabbing
the subjects will first benefit from a 5 minutes explanation on how to perform self-swabbing and will then performed the swabbing under the supervision of a trained healthcare professional
|
Patient realises the nasal swabbing himself first, then undergoes conventionnal swabbing
|
Eksperymentalny: Conventional swabbing followed by supervised self-swabbing
the subject will undergo conventional nasopharyngeal swabbing performed by a trained healthcare professional first.
|
patient undergoes conventionnal swabbing first then realises the nasal swabbing himself
|
Co mierzy badanie?
Podstawowe miary wyniku
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
---|---|---|
Non-inferiority of self-swabbing compared to conventional swabbing concerning diagnosis sensitivity
Ramy czasowe: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
assessed using consistency of COVID-19 RT-PCR results for both sampling modalities (Self- swabbing versus conventional-swabbing).
If non-inferiority is confirmed on this criterion, pain will be tested.
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
Miary wyników drugorzędnych
Miara wyniku |
Opis środka |
Ramy czasowe |
---|---|---|
Correlation between age, sex and swabbing-induced pain
Ramy czasowe: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Score on the pain numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between eye color and swabbing-induced pain
Ramy czasowe: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Eye-color self-reported by the subject on a validated 14 item scale and pain score on the numeric rating scale (NRS) (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between eye color and swabbing-induced discomfort
Ramy czasowe: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Eye-color self-reported by the subject on a validated 14 item scale and discomfort score on numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more discomfort)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between symptoms (fever, headache, asthenia, anosmia, agueusia, cough, dyspnea, muscle pain, sore throat, diarrhea) and swabbing-induced pain
Ramy czasowe: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
symptoms self-reported by the subject and pain score on numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between body mass index and swabbing-induced pain
Ramy czasowe: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
symptoms self-reported by the subject and pain score on numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between anticipated pain and actual pain
Ramy czasowe: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
anticipated and actual pain self-reported on numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between anticipated discomfort and actual discomfort.
Ramy czasowe: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
anticipated and actual discomfort self-reported on numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Richness assessment for respiratory cells
Ramy czasowe: Day 0
|
Ct value of beta-globin gene
|
Day 0
|
Non-inferiority of self-swabbing compared to conventional swabbing concerning pain
Ramy czasowe: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (0 indicating no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain).
If non-inferiority is confirmed on this criterion, discomfort will be tested
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
Non-inferiority of self-swabbing compared to conventional swabbing concerning pain discomfort
Ramy czasowe: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (0 indicating no discomfort and 10 the worst imaginable discomfort).
If non-inferiority is confirmed on this criterion, acceptability will be tested
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
Non-inferiority of self-swabbing compared to conventional swabbing concerning acceptability
Ramy czasowe: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (0 indicating that the procedure is not acceptable at all and 10 that the procedure is perfectly well accepted).
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
Współpracownicy i badacze
Śledczy
- Główny śledczy: Xavier MOISSET, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Daty zapisu na studia
Główne daty studiów
Rozpoczęcie studiów (Oczekiwany)
Zakończenie podstawowe (Oczekiwany)
Ukończenie studiów (Oczekiwany)
Daty rejestracji na studia
Pierwszy przesłany
Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości
Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)
Aktualizacje rekordów badań
Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)
Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości
Ostatnia weryfikacja
Więcej informacji
Terminy związane z tym badaniem
Słowa kluczowe
Dodatkowe istotne warunki MeSH
Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania
- RBHP 2020 MOISSET 2
- 2020-A02913-36 (Inny identyfikator: ANSM)
Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze
Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA
Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .
Badania kliniczne na Covid19
-
Henry Ford Health SystemZakończony
-
Ricardo Pereira MestreInstitute of Oncology Research (IOR); Istituto Cantonale di PatologiaZakończony
-
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario...Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Clinical Research Network - SCReNAktywny, nie rekrutujący
-
Inmunova S.A.Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires; Laboratorio Elea Phoenix S.A.; Hospital de... i inni współpracownicyZakończony
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of ManchesterZakończony
-
Rush University Medical CenterHospital Civil de GuadalajaraZakończonyCovid19Stany Zjednoczone, Meksyk
-
Evelyne D.TrottierZakończony
-
Sinovac Research and Development Co., Ltd.Zakończony
-
Mabwell (Shanghai) Bioscience Co., Ltd.Shanghai Public Health Clinical CenterZakończony
-
Anavasi DiagnosticsJeszcze nie rekrutacja