- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT04831853
Self- Versus Conventional-swabbing for COVID-19 Screening (COVISWAB) (COVISWAB)
Comparison for Sensitivity and Tolerance of Self-swabbing and Conventional Nasopharyngeal Swabbing for SARS-CoV-2 Detection for Pain, Discomfort and Acceptability: a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Study
Self-swabbing requires less personal protective equipment and could allow to test more people and even to do quick self-diagnosis if antigenic tests are available.
In a preliminary study on 190 medical students, the investigators have shown that self and conventional swabbing were identically well-accepted with equivalent level of pain and discomfort induced by swabbing. In a sub-group of this sample, the investigators have shown that the quality of the 2 sampling methods were equivalent.
The goal of this large study in the general population is to confirm these findings in an adequately powered study. Such results would allow to develop self-swabbing for large screening campaigns and eventually self-diagnosis using antigenic tests.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Descrizione dettagliata
All consecutive subjects coming to the 2 dedicated centers for COVID-19 screening in Clermont-Ferrand University hospital (one for medical students and one for the general population) will be asked to be included in the present study. They will be randomly assigned to either supervised self-swabbing followed by conventional swabbing led by a healthcare professional or the other way round.
All the subjects will have to complete a brief questionnaire including demographical characteristics (age, sex, height, weight, eye color), potential symptoms (asthenia, fever, anosmia…) anticipated pain and discomfort and previous nasopharyngeal swabbing experience. Pain, discomfort and overall acceptability of the procedure will be completed just after completion of the swabbing.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Anticipato)
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
-
Clermont-Ferrand, Francia, 63000
- CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any subject coming for nasopharyngeal swabbing for SARS-CoV-2 screening
- Fluent in French (both oral and written)
- Able to give an eclaired consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contra-indication to nasopharyngeal swabbing
- Refusal to participate
- Pregnant women
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Diagnostico
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
---|---|
Sperimentale: Supervised self-swabbing followed by conventional swabbing
the subjects will first benefit from a 5 minutes explanation on how to perform self-swabbing and will then performed the swabbing under the supervision of a trained healthcare professional
|
Patient realises the nasal swabbing himself first, then undergoes conventionnal swabbing
|
Sperimentale: Conventional swabbing followed by supervised self-swabbing
the subject will undergo conventional nasopharyngeal swabbing performed by a trained healthcare professional first.
|
patient undergoes conventionnal swabbing first then realises the nasal swabbing himself
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
---|---|---|
Non-inferiority of self-swabbing compared to conventional swabbing concerning diagnosis sensitivity
Lasso di tempo: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
assessed using consistency of COVID-19 RT-PCR results for both sampling modalities (Self- swabbing versus conventional-swabbing).
If non-inferiority is confirmed on this criterion, pain will be tested.
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
---|---|---|
Correlation between age, sex and swabbing-induced pain
Lasso di tempo: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Score on the pain numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between eye color and swabbing-induced pain
Lasso di tempo: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Eye-color self-reported by the subject on a validated 14 item scale and pain score on the numeric rating scale (NRS) (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between eye color and swabbing-induced discomfort
Lasso di tempo: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Eye-color self-reported by the subject on a validated 14 item scale and discomfort score on numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more discomfort)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between symptoms (fever, headache, asthenia, anosmia, agueusia, cough, dyspnea, muscle pain, sore throat, diarrhea) and swabbing-induced pain
Lasso di tempo: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
symptoms self-reported by the subject and pain score on numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between body mass index and swabbing-induced pain
Lasso di tempo: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
symptoms self-reported by the subject and pain score on numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between anticipated pain and actual pain
Lasso di tempo: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
anticipated and actual pain self-reported on numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Correlation between anticipated discomfort and actual discomfort.
Lasso di tempo: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
anticipated and actual discomfort self-reported on numeric rating scale (0 to 10; higher scores meaning more pain)
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure
|
Richness assessment for respiratory cells
Lasso di tempo: Day 0
|
Ct value of beta-globin gene
|
Day 0
|
Non-inferiority of self-swabbing compared to conventional swabbing concerning pain
Lasso di tempo: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (0 indicating no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain).
If non-inferiority is confirmed on this criterion, discomfort will be tested
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
Non-inferiority of self-swabbing compared to conventional swabbing concerning pain discomfort
Lasso di tempo: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (0 indicating no discomfort and 10 the worst imaginable discomfort).
If non-inferiority is confirmed on this criterion, acceptability will be tested
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
Non-inferiority of self-swabbing compared to conventional swabbing concerning acceptability
Lasso di tempo: 5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (0 indicating that the procedure is not acceptable at all and 10 that the procedure is perfectly well accepted).
|
5 minutes after the end of the procedure of nasopharyngeal swabbing
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Xavier MOISSET, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Anticipato)
Completamento primario (Anticipato)
Completamento dello studio (Anticipato)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- RBHP 2020 MOISSET 2
- 2020-A02913-36 (Altro identificatore: ANSM)
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .
Prove cliniche su Covid19
-
Ricardo Pereira MestreInstitute of Oncology Research (IOR); Istituto Cantonale di PatologiaCompletato
-
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario...Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Clinical Research Network - SCReNAttivo, non reclutante
-
Inmunova S.A.Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires; Laboratorio Elea Phoenix S.A.; Hospital de Campaña... e altri collaboratoriCompletato
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of ManchesterCompletato
-
Rush University Medical CenterHospital Civil de GuadalajaraCompletatoCovid19Stati Uniti, Messico
-
Evelyne D.TrottierCompletato
-
Sinovac Research and Development Co., Ltd.Completato
-
Mabwell (Shanghai) Bioscience Co., Ltd.Shanghai Public Health Clinical CenterCompletato
-
Anavasi DiagnosticsNon ancora reclutamento