A Safety and Efficacy Study Comparing the Combination Treatments of Verteporfin Therapy Plus One of Two Different Doses of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide and the Verteporfin Therapy Plus Intravitreal Pegaptanib (VERITAS)

March 3, 2016 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A 24-month Randomized, Double-masked, Sham Controlled, Multicenter, Phase IIIB Study Comparing Photodynamic Therapy With Verteporfin (Visudyne®) Plus Two Different Dose Regimens of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide (1 mg and 4 mg) Versus Visudyne® Plus Intravitreal Pegaptanib(Macugen®) in Patients With Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination treatments in wet age-related macular degeneration. The combination treatment consists of verteporfin photodynamic therapy and either triamcinolone acetonide or pegaptanib added as an intravitreal injection.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
111

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78793
        • Novartis Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age >50
  • all types of untreated subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD
  • lesion size <5400 microns in greater linear dimension (GLD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have a history of prior photodynamic therapy, external beam radiation, subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation, submacular surgery, or transpupillary thermotherapy
  • known allergy to verteporfin, triamcinolone or pegaptanib
  • have received prior treatment with Macugen, or other anti-angiogenic compound or any investigational treatment (e.g. Ruboxistaurin, Lucentis [ranibizumab], Retaane [anecortave acetate], squalamine, siRNA, VEGF-Trap etc.) for neovascular AMD
  • have the presence of fibrosis, hemorrhage, pigment epithelial detachments, tear (tip) of the retinal pigment epithelium or other hypoflourescent lesions obscuring greater than 50% of the CNV lesion
  • have had previous pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye

Other protocol-specified inclusion/exclusion criteria applied.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Verteporfin and Triamcinolone 1 mg
Participants received Verteporfin photodynamic therapy and 1 mg triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injection at the baseline visit. After the baseline visit, these participants received Verteporfin and triamcinolone acetonide 1 mg at every 3 month visit up to Month 9 only if leakage was detected on the fluorescein angiogram. At the 1.5, 4.5, 7.5 and 10.5 month follow-up visits participants received a sham injection. Starting from Month 12, if patients experienced ≥ 10 letters vision loss from the previous visit, they were treated at the investigators' discretion with available standard of care therapy.
Drug: Verteporfin photodynamic therapy
After a 10-minute intravenous infusion of verteporfin at a dose of 6 mg/m^2 body surface area, verteporfin was activated by light application of 50 J/cm^2 to the study eye, begun 15 minutes after the start of infusion.
Other Names:
  • Visudyne
Drug: Triamcinolone acetonide
Triamcinolone acetonide administered by intravitreal injection.
Other Names:
  • Kenalog-40®
Experimental: Verteporfin and Triamcinolone 4 mg
Participants received Verteporfin photodynamic therapy and 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injection at the baseline visit. After the baseline visit, these participants received Verteporfin and triamcinolone acetonide 4 mg at every 3 month visit up to Month 9 only if leakage was detected on the fluorescein angiogram. At the 1.5, 4.5, 7.5 and 10.5 month follow-up visits participants received a sham injection. Starting from Month 12, if patients experienced ≥ 10 letters vision loss from the previous visit, they were treated at the investigators' discretion with available standard of care therapy.
Drug: Verteporfin photodynamic therapy
After a 10-minute intravenous infusion of verteporfin at a dose of 6 mg/m^2 body surface area, verteporfin was activated by light application of 50 J/cm^2 to the study eye, begun 15 minutes after the start of infusion.
Other Names:
  • Visudyne
Drug: Triamcinolone acetonide
Triamcinolone acetonide administered by intravitreal injection.
Other Names:
  • Kenalog-40®
Active Comparator: Verteporfin and Pegaptanib
Participants received Verteporfin photodynamic therapy and 0.3 mg Pegaptanib at the baseline visit. After the baseline visit, these participants received pegaptanib every 1.5 months up until and including the 10.5 month visit. After the baseline visit, these participants also received verteporfin at every 3 month visit up to Month 9 only if leakage was detected on the fluorescein angiogram. Starting from Month 12, if participants experienced ≥ 10 letters vision loss from the previous visit, they were treated at the investigator's discretion with available standard of care therapy.
Drug: Verteporfin photodynamic therapy
After a 10-minute intravenous infusion of verteporfin at a dose of 6 mg/m^2 body surface area, verteporfin was activated by light application of 50 J/cm^2 to the study eye, begun 15 minutes after the start of infusion.
Other Names:
  • Visudyne
Drug: Pegaptanib
Pegaptanib sodium 0.3 mg administered by intravitreal injection.
Other Names:
  • Macugen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Lose Less Than 15 Letters of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at 12 Months From Baseline.
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. A decrease in score indicates worsening of vision. This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who lost less than 15 letters of visual acuity at 12 months as compared with baseline.
Baseline to Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Gain of 5 or More Letters of Best Corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who gained 5 or more letters of visual acuity at 12 months compared with baseline.
Baseline to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Gain of BCVA of 10 or More Letters at 12 Months
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who gained 10 or more letters of visual acuity at 12 months as compared with baseline.
Baseline to Month 12
Percentage of Participants With Gain of BCVA Score of 15 or More Letters at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the percentage of participants who gained 15 or more letters of visual acuity at 12 months as compared with baseline.
Baseline to Month 12
Number of Participants Requiring Verteporfin Treatment Throughout the Study
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
Participants received study drug at the Baseline visit and subsequent retreatment at 3 month intervals if leakage was detected on the fluorescein angiogram. The cumulative distribution of the number of treatments is shown per arm.
Baseline to Month 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Area of Lesion at 12 Months
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
Fluorescein angiography (FA) was used to assess total lesion area. All angiographs were sent to the Central Reading Center (CRC) for analysis.
Baseline to Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
QLT Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 19, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 20, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 31, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CBPD952E2202

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on Verteporfin photodynamic therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings