Efficacy and Safety of 6 Months Treatment With Paricalcitol Injection or Oral in Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism on Dialysis

September 16, 2011 updated by: Abbott

Prospective, Non-randomized, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Oral or Intravenous Paricalcitol Administered Over 6 Months to Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism on Dialysis

Prospective, non-randomized, multi-center study to assess the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol injection or oral administered over 6 months to patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism on dialysis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
147

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Mexico
      • Jojutla Morelos, Mexico, CP 62900
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19391
      • Mexico City, Mexico, CP 03900
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19389
      • Mexico City, Mexico, CP 14000
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19390
      • Mexico City, Mexico, CP 14080
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19393
      • Mexico City, Mexico, CP 16070
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19395
      • Mexico D.F., Mexico, CP 01030
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19392
      • Mexico D.F., Mexico, CP 02080
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19397
      • Mexico D.F., Mexico, CP 03650
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19396
      • Mexico D.F., Mexico, CP 14140
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19394
      • Puebla, Mexico, CP 72400
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19399
      • Zapopan, Mexico, CP 45116
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19398
      • Zapopan, Mexico, CP 45150
        • Site Ref # / Investigator 19388

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients >=18 years with secondary hyperparathyroidism (iPTH >= 300 pg/mL)
  • Patients in a chronic hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis program previously treated with vitamin D metabolites or without previous treatment
  • Patients in which treatment with paricalcitol injection or oral is clinically indicated according to the criteria of the participating investigator
  • Patients providing their signed informed consent to participate in the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe hyperparathyroidism (iPTH > 3,000 pg/ml)
  • Patients with hypercalcaemia (calcium >=11.0 mg/dl, adjusted according to Albumin level), hyperphosphataemia (phosphorus >= 6.5 mg/dl) or patients with calcium x phosphorus >= 70
  • Known hypersensitivity and/or toxicity to vitamin D metabolites and/or other product ingredients
  • Patients who have participated in clinical studies within the last month or who are currently enrolled in clinical studies
  • Patients who cannot tolerate or take phosphorus binders that do not contain Calcium and/or Aluminum
  • Patients that in the opinion of the investigator, for any reason, are not good candidates for therapy with Synthetic Analogues of Vitamin D

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Paricalcitol injection
ABT-358 Zemplar
Drug: Paricalcitol injection
Most recent iPTH level in pg/mL divided by 100 = dose in mcg; dose is rounded down to nearest mcg and administered 3x weekly
Other Names:
  • Zemplar
  • ABT-358
  • paricalcitol
Active Comparator: Paricalcitol capsules
ABT-358 Zemplar
Drug: Paricalcitol capsules
Most recent iPTH level in pg/mL divided by 80 = dose in mcg; dose is rounded down to nearest mcg and administered 3x weekly
Other Names:
  • Zemplar
  • ABT-358
  • paricalcitol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve at Least a 50% Reduction in iPTH Compared to Baseline Level
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Number of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction in intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) compared to the baseline level.
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analysis of Episodes of Hypercalcemia (> 11.5 mg/dL), Hyperphosphatemia (> 7.0 mg/dL) and Elevations of Calcium x Phosphorus Product (> 75)
Time Frame: 24 Weeks
Number of participants with hypercalcemia (calcium levels greater than 11.5 mg/dL), hyperphosphatemia (phosphorus levels greater than 7.0 mg/dL), or calcium x phosphorus product levels greater than 75.
24 Weeks
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve an iPTH <300 pg/mL
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Number of participants who achieved an intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level of less than 300 pg/mL.
24 weeks
Time Required to Achieve: (1) a Reduction in iPTH Less Than <300 pg/mL;(2) a 50% Reduction in iPTH Compared to the Baseline Level; and (3) Either a Reduction in iPTH Less Than <300 pg/mL or a 50% Reduction in iPTH Compared to the Baseline Level
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Number of days required to achieve a reduction in intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) to less than 300 pg/mL, a reduction in iPTH of greater than or equal to 50%, or either a reduction in iPTH to less than 300 pg/mL or a reduction in iPTH of greater than or equal to 50%.
24 weeks
Duration of Response to Treatment
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Time in days between 2 consecutive visits with a reduction in intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) of greater than or equal to 50% from the baseline visit.
24 weeks
Health-related Quality of Life With Paricalcitol Injection or Oral Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Analysis of the differences before and after 24 weeks of treatment in various quality of life measurements for participants on hemodialysis receiving paricalcitol injection and participants on peritoneal dialysis receiving paricalcitol capsules.
Baseline and 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Abbott

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Jose-Luis Cañadas, MD, Abbott

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 28, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 28, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 2, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 25, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 16, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • W10-129

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Clinical Trials on Paricalcitol injection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings