Genotype-Phenotype Correlations of Late Infantile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis

July 28, 2020 updated by: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
The primary aim of the study is to assess the genotype - phenotype correlations of the CNS manifestations of late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (LINCL), a fatal, rare, recessive disorder of the CNS in children. This study will be accomplished by comparing the genotype to a neurologic assessment and Weill Cornell LINCL scale, the UBDRS scale, the standardized CHQ quality of life scale, and the Mullen scale; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); and routine clinical evaluations. This study is designed to run parallel to a separate study which is being done by the Department of Genetic Medicine, which will use gene transfer to treat the central nervous system (CNS) manifestations of late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

This protocol is designed to study the natural disease process of LINCL. We propose to assess the correlation between genotype (genetic constitution) and phenotype (observable characteristics) of late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (LINCL) in children diagnosed with LINCL in all stages. LINCL is a form of Batten disease that affects the brain of children and prevents it from functioning properly. These children are born with genetic changes called mutations that result in the inability of the brain to properly recycle proteins in the brain. The recycling failure leads to death of the nerve cells in the brain and progressive loss of brain function. Children with Batten disease are normal at birth but by age 2 to 4 have motor and vision problems which progress rapidly to death at age approximately 10 years old. There are no therapies available to treat the disease. This study is designed to run parallel to the gene transfer protocol, which will include 16 individuals in two groups: Group A will receive 9.0x10^11 genome copies (gc) of the vector and Group B will receive 2.85x10^11 gc; we anticipate that we will be able to capture a one-time genotype - phenotype snapshot for all n=32, and an 18 months genotype - phenotype progression assessment for n=16.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
48

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Weill Cornell Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will be carried out in children diagnosed with LINCL in all stages.

Description

Inclusion Criteria.

  1. Definitive diagnosis of LINCL, based on clinical phenotype and genotype.
  2. The subject must be between the age of 2 and 18 years.
  3. The subject will not previously have participated in a gene transfer or stem cell study.
  4. Parents of study participants must agree to comply in good faith with the conditions of the study, including attending all of the required baseline and follow-up assessments, and both parents or legal guardians must give consent for their child's participation.

Exclusion criteria.

  1. Presence of other significant medical or neurological conditions may disqualify the subject from participation in this study e.g.,malignancy, congenital heart disease, liver or renal failure.
  2. Subjects without adequate control of seizures.
  3. Subjects with heart disease that would be a risk for anesthesia or a history of major risk factors for hemorrhage.
  4. Subjects who cannot participate in MRI studies.
  5. Concurrent participation in any other FDA approved Investigational New Drug.
  6. Subjects with history of prolonged bleeding or abnormal platelet function or taking aspirin.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Weill-Cornell LINCL scale at 18 months
Time Frame: Day 0, 18 months
The Weill Cornell LINCL scale, a 12 point scale which combines assessment of feeding, gait, motor and language to give an overall assessment of various CNS functions
Day 0, 18 months
Change in MRI parameters at 18 months
Time Frame: Day 0, 18 months
MRI assessment at various intervals Day 0 and month 18. Based on previous analyses, we have determined that 3 imaging parameters (% grey matter volume, % ventricular volume and cortical apparent diffusion coefficient) correlate best with age and with the Weill Cornell LINCL scale. These 3 imaging parameters will be used to assess disease progression in this screening protocol and the effect of the gene transfer in the IRB approved gene transfer trials (IRB #0810010013 and #1005011054). For those children available to continue in the study, all parameters will be re-assessed by comparing baseline evaluations to month 18 evaluation.
Day 0, 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in CHQ or ITQoL
Time Frame: Day 0, 18 months
Quality of life questionnaires which will be completed by at least one parent/legal guardian at the time of the LINCL patients' visits to Weill Cornell16,17; we will administer either survey depending on the age of the subject independently to each parent to minimize observer bias if both parents are present.
Day 0, 18 months
Change in Mullen Scale
Time Frame: Day 0, 18 months
A pediatric developmental psychological rating scale
Day 0, 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 16, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 16, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 18, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0901010186
  • U54NS065768 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • R01NS061848 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 5R01NS061848-04 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • LDN 6716 (Other Identifier: RDCRN)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings