Clinical Trial of N-acetylcysteine Versus Placebo Efficacy in the Cannabis Withdrawal (MUCOCRAV)

June 14, 2021 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Randomized and Double-blind Clinical Trial of N-acetylcysteine Versus Placebo Efficacy in the Cannabis Withdrawal

The primary purpose is to assess the efficacy in human of N-acetylcysteine versus placebo during 4 weeks in cannabis withdrawal.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Introduction:There are few clinical trials on pharmacotherapies in marijuana dependence. There is no randomized and double-blind trial on N-acetylcysteine efficacy in marijuana withdrawal.Aims:The first aim is to assess the efficacy in human (n=150 outpatients) of N-acetylcysteine versus placebo during 4 weeks in cannabis withdrawal.The secondary aims are:a-Assessing the abstinence during the next 5 months of follow-up.b-Assessing the correlations between genetic characteristics: cytochrome CYP2C9 and CYP3A4, CNR1 receptor, Fatty Amide Hydroxylase (FAAH), dopamine DAT transporters and Catechol-O-MéthylTransférase (COMT); and three phenotypes : 1. cannabis level consumption, 2. cannabis abuse and dependence (DSM-IV), and 3. cannabis withdrawal.c-Assessing tobacco consumption (Fagerström test), NICOTINIQUE receptor CHRA3 and cannabis quitting success.Subjects:150 cannabis outpatients, seeking treatment in LARIBOISIERE hospital cannabis setting, to cut down their cannabis use.Inclusion criteria: > 18 year old, not pregnant or breast feeding, cannabis abuse or dependence diagnosis (DSM-IV), acceptance of the trial and consent signed, validated by ethic committee.Methods:Randomized and double-blind trial.Visit 0: Clinical assessment and trial presentation, Validate inclusion and non- inclusion criteria.Visit 1: Consent signed. Blood and urine analysis. Questionnaires assessing cannabis and tobacco's craving.NAC and placebo doses will be increased if craving decreases <25% compared to previous visit. The doses start at 200 mg x 4/24h to 800 mg x 4/24h.Visit 2 to 5: Medication safety and cannabis craving and withdrawal assessment during 4 weeks.Visit 5: Blood and urine analysis.Visit 6 to 8: abstinence assessment during 5 months.Goals:Efficacy assessment of N-Acetylcysteine in cannabis withdrawal and abstinence compared to placebo. Assessment of NAC efficacy in cannabis craving. The length of the study is 6 months to evaluate abstinence persistence. Evaluation of clinical, biological and genetic factors associated with abstinence success.Statistic :Sample size : A two group continuity corrected c2 test with a 0.050 two-sided significance level will have 80% power to detect the difference between a Group 1 proportion, p1, of 0.250 and a Group 2 proportion, p2, of 0.500 (odds ratio of 3.000) when the sample size in each group is 66. Taking into account a rate of lost of follow-up around 15 % the total sample size of the study has been fixed at N= 150 patients.Main criterion and binary secondary criteria will be analysed by Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact probability test. Relationships between genotype and phenotypes will be analysed by multivariate logistic models

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
6

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Service de Psychiatrie - Hôpital Lariboisière

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 51 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > 18 year old
  • Not pregnant or breast feeding
  • Cannabis abuse or dependence diagnosis (DSM-IV)
  • Acceptance of the trial and consent signed, validated by ethic committee
  • Patient affiliated to social insurance care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to N-acetylcystein : allergic to N-acetylcystein, severe allergic illness, PHENYLCETONURIA, lactose intolerance, gastro-duodenal ulcer.
  • Severe somatic disease not stabilized : diabetes, epilepsia, recent myocardial infarcts, asthma.
  • Severe mental disease not stabilized : schizophrenia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental : N-acetylcystein
N-acetylcystein and placebo doses will be increased if craving decreases <25% compared to the previous visit. The doses start at 200 mg x 4/24h to 800 mg x 4/24h
Drug: N-acetylcystein
Visit 1: Consent signed. Blood and urine analysis. Questionnaires assessing cannabis and tobacco's craving.N-acetylcystein and placebo doses will be increased if craving decreases <25% compared to previous visit.The doses start at 200 mg x 4/24h to 800 mg x 4/24h.Visit 2 to 5: Medication safety and cannabis craving and withdrawal assessment during 4 weeks.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Comparator
N-acetylcystein and placebo doses will be increased if craving decreases <25% compared to the previous visit. The doses start at 200 mg x 4/24h to 800 mg x 4/24h
Drug: N-acetylcystein
Visit 1: Consent signed. Blood and urine analysis. Questionnaires assessing cannabis and tobacco's craving.N-acetylcystein and placebo doses will be increased if craving decreases <25% compared to previous visit.The doses start at 200 mg x 4/24h to 800 mg x 4/24h.Visit 2 to 5: Medication safety and cannabis craving and withdrawal assessment during 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Success rate of withdrawal defined by a reduction of at least 50% of the rate of urinary carboxy-THC
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The success rate of withdrawal defined by a declarative reduction of at least 50% of the cannabis
Time Frame: at 2, 3 and 6 months
at 2, 3 and 6 months
The retention rate of withdrawal
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
The rate of complete cessation of cannabis use
Time Frame: at 4 weeks and 2, 3 and 6 months.
Declarative clinical criteria by the patient and validated at D28 by the decrease of at least 50% of the report of the dosage of the report CarboxyTHC / creatinine
at 4 weeks and 2, 3 and 6 months.
Phenotypic profile (3 major types)
Time Frame: at Day 28 (end of treatment)
  • The amount of cannabis and THC consumed with use of the upper quartile to define a high consumption and the lowest quartile to define the weak consumer
  • Dependence and abuse according to DSM IV criteria;
  • Withdrawal syndrome in dependent patients according to DSM IV and the scale of MJQQ Gorelick.
at Day 28 (end of treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Eric GUILLEM, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 21, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 23, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 14, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P081120

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings