AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D Multifocal Intraocular Lens (IOL) Model SN6AD2 [SV25T0] in Japan

June 8, 2015 updated by: Alcon Research

Clinical Investigation of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® Multifocal Intraocular Lens Model SN6AD2

The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and effectiveness of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D Multifocal IOL Model SN6AD2 [SV25T0] in Japanese cataract patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Each subject completed a preoperative examination of both eyes, implantation of IOL at the operative visit for each eye, and up to 8 postoperative visits (each eye examined at Day 1-2, Day 7-14, and Day 30-60, with binocular visits at Day 120-180 and Day 330-420 after the second implantation). The second implantation occurred within 30 days of the first.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 812-0011
        • Hayashi Eye Hospital
    • Tokyo
      • Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 101-0061
        • Tokyo Dental College Suidobashi Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sign informed consent;
  • Diagnosed with bilateral cataracts;
  • Planned cataract removal by phacoemulsification;
  • Potential postoperative visual acuity of 0.5 decimal or better in both eyes;
  • Preoperative astigmatism ≤ 1.5 diopter;
  • Clear intraocular media other than cataract in study eyes;
  • Calculated lens power within the available range;
  • Able to undergo second eye surgery within 30 days of the first eye surgery;
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant irregular corneal aberration as demonstrated by corneal topography;
  • Any inflammation or edema (swelling) of the cornea;
  • Diagnosed degenerative visual disorders predicted to cause future acuity losses to a level worse than 0.5 decimal;
  • Diabetic retinopathy;
  • Previous refractive surgery, retinal detachment, corneal transplant;
  • Glaucoma;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Currently participating in another investigational drug or device study;
  • Exclusion criteria during surgery;
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: SN6AD2
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D Multifocal IOL Model SN6AD2 [SV25T0], bilateral implantation
Device: AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D Multifocal IOL Model SN6AD2 [SV25T0]
Multifocal IOL with extended secondary focal point implanted for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uncorrected Decimal VA (5 m)
Time Frame: Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Visual acuity (VA) was tested monocularly (each eye separately) at all visits and binocularly (both eyes together) at Day 30-60, Day 120-180, and Day 330-420 unaided at a distance of 5 meters (m) using a chart. VA was measured in decimal, with 1.0 decimal corresponding to 20/20 Snellen. A higher numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Uncorrected Decimal VA (50 cm)
Time Frame: Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
VA was tested monocularly at all visits and binocularly at Day 30-60, Day 120-180, and Day 330-420 unaided at a distance of 50 centimeters (cm) using a chart. VA was measured in decimal, with 1.0 decimal corresponding to 20/20 Snellen. A higher numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Best Corrected Decimal VA (5 m)
Time Frame: Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
VA was tested monocularly at all visits and binocularly at Day 30-60, Day 120-180, and Day 330-420 with the participant's best spectacle correction at a distance of 5 m using a chart. VA was measured in decimal, with 1.0 decimal corresponding to 20/20 Snellen. A higher numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Best Corrected Decimal VA (50 cm)
Time Frame: Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
VA was tested monocularly at all visits and binocularly at Day 30-60, Day 120-180, and Day 330-420 with the participant's best spectacle correction at a distance of 50 cm using a chart. VA was measured in decimal, with 1.0 decimal corresponding to 20/20 Snellen. A higher numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Distance-Corrected Decimal VA (50 cm)
Time Frame: Baseline (preoperative), Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
VA was tested monocularly at the preoperative, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, and Day 330-420 visits and binocularly at Day 30-60, Day 120-180, and Day 330-420 using a chart. Distance-corrected VA at 50 cm is the VA at 50 cm measured under a corrected condition in which best-corrected VA at 5 m was obtained. VA was measured in decimal, with 1.0 decimal corresponding to 20/20 Snellen. A higher numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Baseline (preoperative), Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uncorrected Decimal VA (1 m)
Time Frame: Day 120-180, Day 330-420
VA was tested binocularly unaided at a distance of 1 m using a chart. VA was measured in decimal, with 1.0 decimal corresponding to 20/20 Snellen. A higher numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Distance Corrected Decimal VA (1 m)
Time Frame: Day 120-180, Day 330-420
VA was tested binocularly using a chart. Distance-corrected VA at 1 m is the VA at 1 m measured under a corrected condition in which best-corrected VA at 5 m was obtained. VA was measured in decimal, with 1.0 decimal corresponding to 20/20 Snellen. A higher numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Uncorrected Decimal VA (40 cm)
Time Frame: Day 120-180, Day 330-420
VA was tested binocularly unaided at a distance of 40 cm using a chart. VA was measured in decimal, with 1.0 decimal corresponding to 20/20 Snellen. A higher numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Distance Corrected Decimal VA (40 cm)
Time Frame: Day 120-180, Day 330-420
VA was tested binocularly using a chart. Distance-corrected VA at 40 cm is the VA at 40 cm measured under a corrected condition in which best-corrected VA at 5 m was obtained. VA was measured in decimal, with 1.0 decimal corresponding to 20/20 Snellen. A higher numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Uncorrected Decimal VA at Best Distance
Time Frame: Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
VA was tested monocularly at all visits and binocularly at Day 30-60, Day 120-180, and Day 330-420 using a chart at the distance of best near vision (cm) as decided by the participant. VA was measured in decimal, with 1.0 decimal corresponding to 20/20 Snellen. A higher numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Mean Best Distance (cm) for Uncorrected Decimal Near VA
Time Frame: Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
VA was tested monocularly at all visits and binocularly at Day 30-60, Day 120-180, and Day 330-420 unaided using a chart. The participant indicated the distance (cm) at which best near vision was attained.
Baseline (preoperative), Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Mean Best Distance (cm) for Distance Corrected Decimal Near VA
Time Frame: Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
VA was tested monocularly at Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, and Day 330-420 and binocularly at Day 30-60, Day 120-180, and Day 330-420 with the participant's best spectacle correction using a chart. The participant indicated the distance (cm) at which best near vision was attained.
Day 1-2, Day 7-14, Day 30-60, Day 120-180, Day 330-420
Best Corrected Far (3 m) Contrast Sensitivity
Time Frame: Day 120-180 from second eye implantation
Far contrast sensitivity (ie, the ability to detect slight changes in luminance before they become indistinguishable) was assessed binocularly with the participant's best spectacle correction at a distance of 3 m using the Vector Vision CSV 1000 illuminated box (one site) and the Vision Contrast Test System (other site). Contrast sensitivity was assessed at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd). For CSV 1000, contrast sensitivity was not measured at spatial frequency 1.5 cpd because there was no option for this frequency. Raw scores were transformed to logMar (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) units. A higher numeric value represents better contrast sensitivity.
Day 120-180 from second eye implantation
Best Corrected Near (46 cm) Contrast Sensitivity
Time Frame: Day 120-180 from second eye implantation
Near contrast sensitivity (ie, the ability to detect slight changes in luminance before they become indistinguishable) was assessed binocularly with the participant's best spectacle correction at a distance of 46 cm using the Functional Acuity Contrast Test (FACT). Contrast sensitivity was assessed at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd). Raw scores were transformed to logMar units. A higher numeric value represents better contrast sensitivity.
Day 120-180 from second eye implantation
Mean Defocus Decimal VA (5 m)
Time Frame: Day 120-180 from second eye implantation
Defocus VA (an indicator of the expected range of vision with a presbyopia-correcting IOL) was tested binocularly with the participant's best spectacle correction at a distance of 5 m using a chart. Lenses of different spherical powers were placed in front of the eyes to produce varying levels of defocus. The VA at each spherical power was measured in decimal, with 1.0 decimal corresponding to 20/20 Snellen. A higher numeric value represents better visual acuity.
Day 120-180 from second eye implantation
Percentage of Participants With Positive Response, Stereoscopic Vision Test
Time Frame: Day 120-180 from second eye implantation
Stereopsis (the ability to perceive depth and 3-dimensional structure) was assessed binocularly under well-lit conditions at best distance using the Stereo Optical Company, Inc., Original Stereo Fly Test and polarized viewers. The participant was shown a series of symbols, with a positive response defined as correct identification of the 3-dimensional symbol. Responses were recorded for 3 symbols: Fly (easiest to perceive), animal, and circle (hardest to perceive).
Day 120-180 from second eye implantation
Percentage of Participants With Positive Response, Quality of Life Questions
Time Frame: Day 120-180 from second eye implantation
The participant completed a questionnaire, indicating (yes/no) if he/she experienced visual difficulty in every-day activities while not wearing spectacles. A positive response was defined as, "Yes=visual difficulty."
Day 120-180 from second eye implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Alcon Research

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Hiroshi Kodama, Alcon Japan, Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 22, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 23, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 8, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • J-11-037

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataracts

Clinical Trials on AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +2.5 D Multifocal IOL Model SN6AD2 [SV25T0]

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings