Dysphotopsia Following Laser Peripheral Iridotomy

February 11, 2013 updated by: Iqbal Ike Ahmed, Credit Valley EyeCare

Incidence of Visual Symptom Following Laser (Nd:YAG ) Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Relation to Position of LPI

To establish the correlation of the location of the Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy to the post operative visual symptoms experienced by some patients. The investigators hypothesize that fully uncovered laser peripheral iridotomy will produce less significant dysphotopsia, due to avoidance of the prismatic effect produced by the tear film than those covered.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Nd:YAG LPI is a frequently performed procedure for patients who have narrow angles at risk of acute angle closure glaucoma, pupillary-block conditions, chronic angle closure, and pigment dispersion syndrome. Most complications associated with the procedure are benign and include intraocular pressure (IOP) spike, transient uveitis, hyphema, corneal or lens damage and closure of the iridotomy. Visual disturbances have been also reported but only a few papers address this specific issue. The rate of these symptoms vary between 2.7% and 4%. It is believed that these symptoms are associated with the fact that light enters through the LPI and thus creating abnormal visual symptoms. Hence it has been suggested to carefully place the LPI so that the eyelid fully covers the LPI, therefore preventing light getting through. However, reports of patients with fully covered LPIs and visual disturbances have led to hypothesize the theory that even when fully covered by the eyelid, light can access through the LPI by a base-up prism created by the tear meniscus at the lid margin. Therefore, placement of the LPI, fully covered, partially covered or totally uncovered can potentially lead to equally significant symptoms. This study will attempt to address the issue of placement of the LPI in relationship with visual symptoms.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
214

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5L 1W8
        • Credit Valley Eyecare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able and willing to make the required study visit
  • Able and willing to give consent and follow study instructions
  • An indication to undergo laser peripheral iridotomy (narrow angles, occludeable angle at risk of acute angle closure, pupil block condition, chronic angle closure, pigment dispersion syndrome)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous intraocular surgery
  • Best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40
  • Asymmetrical ptosis of more than 2mm
  • Any active intraocular inflammation
  • Acute attack of angle closure glaucoma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Superior Laser Peripheral Iridotomy
Neodymium-doped: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser peripheral iridotomy was performed on the superior aspect of the iris in the eye being treated. This will be in the 11 to 1 o'clock position.
Device: Neodymium-doped: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser
This device is used to perform the peripheral iridotomy on all patients. It is a standard of care approved device.
Other Names:
  • Nd:YAG Laser
Procedure: Nd:YAG Laser Peripheral Iridotomy
After application of topical anesthetic to the eye undergoing the LPI, the patient is seated at the laser machine. Abraham iridotomy lens filled with a viscous material will be used to facilitate the procedure. The thinnest area of the iris quadrant treated will be chosen. Nd:YAG Laser will be applied until iridotomy is opened satisfactory.
Other Names:
  • Nd:YAG LPI
Experimental: Temporal Laser Peripheral Iridotomy
Neodymium-doped: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser peripheral iridotomy was performed on the temporal aspect of the iris in the eye being treated. The position will be in the 2 to 4 o'clock in the left eye and 8 to 10 o'clock in the right eye.
Device: Neodymium-doped: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser
This device is used to perform the peripheral iridotomy on all patients. It is a standard of care approved device.
Other Names:
  • Nd:YAG Laser
Procedure: Nd:YAG Laser Peripheral Iridotomy
After application of topical anesthetic to the eye undergoing the LPI, the patient is seated at the laser machine. Abraham iridotomy lens filled with a viscous material will be used to facilitate the procedure. The thinnest area of the iris quadrant treated will be chosen. Nd:YAG Laser will be applied until iridotomy is opened satisfactory.
Other Names:
  • Nd:YAG LPI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of Linear Dysphotopsia
Time Frame: Baseline (Time =0),1 month
The change in presence of linear dysphotopsia from baseline (prior to intervention) to 1 month after the Nd:YAG laser intervention is performed.
Baseline (Time =0),1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of Visual Dysphotopsia
Time Frame: Baseline (Time = 0), 1 month
This includes Halo, Crescent, Ghost Images, Glare, Shadows. This records the change in the presence of these symptoms from baseline (prior to intervention) and 1 month after the Nd:YAG laser intervention.
Baseline (Time = 0), 1 month
Pain Experienced
Time Frame: Procedure (Time = 0)
The pain experienced when the Nd:YAG procedure is performed. This is on a scale of 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 the most severe pain imaginable.
Procedure (Time = 0)
Nd:YAG Laser Power Used
Time Frame: Procedure (Time = 0)
The amount of laser power used on the Nd:YAG laser to perform the intervention.
Procedure (Time = 0)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Credit Valley EyeCare

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Iqbal Ike K Ahmed, MD, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
  • Study Director: Vanessa Vera, MD, University of Toronto, Canada

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 31, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 13, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 11, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CVEC-LPI

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Narrow Angle Patients at Risk for Angle Closure Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Neodymium-doped: Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) laser

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings