Study to Observe the Safety and Efficacy of Etanercept (Enbrel®) in Patients With Moderately Active Rheumatoid Arthritis in Every Day Clinical Practice in Austria

April 30, 2018 updated by: Pfizer

A Multicenter Non-interventional Study To Observe The Safety And Efficacy Of Etanercept (Enbrel (Registered)) In Patients With Moderately Active Rheumatoid Arthritis In Every Day Clinical Practice In Austria

This is a prospective non-interventional observational study to evaluate the treatment of moderately active RA patients in every day clinical practice in Austria. Patients will be observed over 52 weeks. The primary endpoint will be percentage of patients who reach CDAI remission after 24 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non-interventional observational study, national, multicenter prospective non-interventional study (NIS) as defined by the Austrian Drug Law § 2a Section 3 N/A

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
111

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Austria
      • Graz, Austria, 8010
        • Ordination Dr. Thomas Muller
      • Graz, Austria, 8020
        • Barmherzige Brüder Graz Eggenberg
      • Klagenfurt, Austria, 9020
        • Ordination Dr. Horst Just
      • Linz, Austria, 4020
        • Ordination Dr. Richard Janetschko
      • Linz, Austria, 4030
        • Ordination Dr. Wilhelm Kaiser
      • Linz, Austria, 4040
        • Dr. Eichbauer-Sturm
      • Vienna, Austria, 1100
        • Rheumazentrum Oberlaa
      • Wien, Austria, 1130
        • Ordination Dr. Peter Peichl
      • Wien, Austria, 1170
        • Ordination Dr. Maya Thun
      • Wiener Neudorf, Austria, 2351
        • Ordination Dr. Thomas Schwingenschlogl

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with moderately active RA that are treated with Etanercept will be studied. All patients enrolled should meet the usual prescribing criteria for Etanercept as per the Austrian SmPC and should be entered into the study at the investigator's discretion.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient is eligible to receive Etanercept treatment according to the Austrian SmPC.
  2. The decision to treat the patient with Etanercept has been made independently by the physician and is clearly separated from the decision to include the patient in the study. The treatment decision was made in advance and is not dependent on the protocol.
  3. The patient was informed about the study and gave his/her consent and signed an Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) submitted written Informed Consent form on use of the data.
  4. The patient has moderately active RA, defined as a disease activity of CDAI >10 and ≤22 and/or DAS28 (CRP)>3.2 and ≤ 5.1

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any contraindication according to the Austrian SmPC, which includes:

    A hypersensitivity to any component of Etanercept, active tuberculosis or any other serious infection.

  2. Patient has previously participated in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Full Analysis Set
Full Analysis Set (FAS): The FAS contains any patient that has given written informed consent.
Other: non-intervention
observation of Etanercept treatment in moderately active RA patients in Austria. Etanercept treatment according to Austrian SmPC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Remission at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
CDAI is a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the swollen joint counts (SJC), tender/painful joint counts (TJC), participant's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) and physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA). CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC and TJC (based on 28-joint assessment), PtGA and PGA (assessed on 0-10 cm visual analog scale; higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI less than equal to (<=) 2.8 indicates disease remission, greater than (>) 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, greater than (>) 10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and >22 = high disease activity. Percentage of participants with CDAI remission (score <=2.8) at Week 24 were reported.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Status of Disease Activity at Week 12 and Week 52
Time Frame: Week 12 and Week 52
CDAI is a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the SJC, TJC, PtGA and PGA. CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC, TJC (based on 28-joint assessment), PtGA and PGA (assessed on 0-10 cm visual analog scale; higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI <= 2.8 indicates disease remission, > 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, >10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and >22 = high disease activity. Percentage of participants with different type of CDAI status of disease activity (remission, low disease, moderate and high disease activity) at Week 12 and 52 were reported. Only those categories in which at least 1 participant had data were reported.
Week 12 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Scores at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52
CDAI is a simplified index for assessing the disease activity comprising of the SJC, TJC, PtGA and PGA. CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: SJC, TJC (based on 28-joint assessment), PtGA and PGA (assessed on 0-10 cm visual analog scale; higher scores indicated greater affection due to disease activity). CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI <= 2.8 indicates disease remission, > 2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, >10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and >22 = high disease activity.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 24, Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 10, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 7, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 14, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B1801357

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on non-intervention

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings