Intervention for Women in Costa Rica

April 7, 2018 updated by: Edward Frongillo, Jr., University of South Carolina

Intervention for Women in Costa Rica Who Are Discouraged and Have Food Insecurity and Excess Body Weight

The study develops, implements, and evaluates an intervention focused on alleviating discouragement, food insecurity, and excess weight in women,targeted at the individual, family, and community levels in the Canton Central of the province of Alajuela, Costa Rica.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Food insecurity is defined as "limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods or limited or uncertain ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways." The coexistence of excess body weight and food insecurity is recognized by researchers and increasingly by the broader public. Poverty and household food insecurity are priority topics for the global community because of their negative impacts in physical and mental health. In Costa Rica, there are no specific data about how many households are affected by food insecurity, but it is well-known that the poverty level has stood at about 20% for the past five years and that food insecurity has an economic component through material deprivation. Thus, even though food insecurity is not the same as poverty, the conditions often coexist.

Multiple studies have concluded that poverty and household food insecurity are often associated with excess body weight in women, but not men. Excess body weight, as defined as Body Mass Index ≥25, is a global health problem and the major public health problem in Costa Rican women. In 2008-2009, 59.7% of women between 20 and 44 years of age have excess body weight, reaching 77.3% in women who are 45 to 64 years of age. Excess body weight also has multiple consequences for physical and mental health. Thus, women with excess body weight and food insecurity have compromised their physical and mental health in multiple ways.

This project builds on a productive partnership between the School of Nutrition of the University of Costa Rica, the association Agenda de Mujeres, the Hospital of Alajuela, and the Women´s Office of the Municipality of Alajuela. For the last eight years, these organizations have been working together to implement health promotion interventions in low-income women with excess weight. For this project, we have the support of the University of South Carolina.

The conceptual framework that guides the intervention is based on the investigators' previous work in Costa Rica that found that discouragement - or in other words, "feeling depressed" - is the primary link in the coexistence of food insecurity and excess body weight among Costa Rican women.

The study is a 6-month intervention targeted at the individual, family, and community levels in the Canton Central of the province of Alajuela, Costa Rica. The specific aims are:

Specific Aim 1: To determine the impact of an intervention to alleviate discouragement feelings among food-insecure, excess-weight women. Hypothesis 1: After the intervention, the participants in the intervention group, as compared with the control group, will reduce their household food security status, increase their psychological and economic empowerment level, decrease their depression and anxiety levels, increase perceived social support, and decrease their body mass index and waist circumference. Qualitative methods, specifically group interviews and semi-structured in-depth interviews, also are used to assess the intervention Specific Aim 2: To qualitatively examine the impact of the intervention on gender norms, including co-responsibility in the household (i.e., joint decision-making, sharing responsibilities in the household, including taking care of children and the disabled and contributing to household support), and self-care, including healthy nutrition.

To address these aims, we designed a cluster-randomized controlled trial design at the health-center level, the first level of care in Costa Rica. Investigators randomize 15 matched pairs of health centers in a 1:1 ratio to intervention and control arms, and enroll 7 participants per health center (total n=210).

For specific aim #2 the investigators will use qualitative methods, such as group interviews, semi-structured in-depth interviews, and non-participant observation This study is significant because there are no interventions in Costa Rica or other countries that aim to improve both food security and health, including mental health and excess body weight, in food-insecure women with excess body weight. Therefore, studies are needed to develop, implement, and evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of interventions targeting these women.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

171

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alajuela, Costa Rica
        • Municipality of Alajuela

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being excess weight BMI ≥ 25, according to the World Health Organization classification
  • Being between 18 and 60 years old
  • Being food insecure ( low, moderate, or severe) according to have a score ≥ 17 in the Food Insecurity Scale of Costa Rica
  • Living in the selected community
  • Being willing to participate fully in the study
  • Having at least one other adult household member( ideally) or family member willing to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  • Don't Know how to read and write
  • Not being pregnant at the time of recruitment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Non-Intensive Intervention
Three short group sessions that promote healthy lifestyles
Group sessions for healthy lifestyle
Experimental: Intensive Intervention
a) Individual level: a six-month intervention comprised of 12 two-hour sessions, three follow-up monthly sessions, two workshops with the participants' household members and community members and one final session that will be graduation day; b) Household level: 2 workshops about co-responsibility in the household, and self-care and nutrition, including a theater performance. Six assignments with household members' participation; c) Community level: Distribution of 2 different educational materials (one about co-responsibility and another about self-care, including healthy nutrition) and carry out the 2 workshops mentioned above, both with household and community members.
an intervention focused on alleviating discouragement, food insecurity, and excess weight in women and targeted at the individual, family, and community levels

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6 months in body mass index
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Body mass index is defined as the body mass divided by the square of the body height, and is expressed in units of kg/m2.
Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 months in household food insecurity as assessed by the food insecurity scale for Costa Rica
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
This scale is comprised of 14 items. The response categories include ''never,'', ''sometimes'' and ''many times."
Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 months in waist circumference
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Waist circumference is a measure of health risk associated with excess fat around the waist.
Baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline to 6 months in social support from family and friends for healthy eating as assessed by the social Support and Eating Habits Survey.
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
The scale consists of 4 sub-scales
Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 months in proportion of women that contribute to household support and find a job
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Women that began to contribute to their household support or/and found a job
Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 months in psychological empowerment as assessed by the Scale of Personal Agency and Empowerment.
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
We will use the subscale for agency of the Scale of Personal Agency and Empowerment.
Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 months in the consumption of sugar drinks and fried foods as assessed by a food-frequency questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
We will use a food frequency with the categories: times per day, per week or per month
Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 months in metabolic equivalents per week of physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
We ask about type of activity, how many times a week and how many minutes in each session of physical activity and we will convert to metabolic equivalents per week
Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 months in discouragement feelings as assessed by the Spanish version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
We will use the 7 items of the depression's subscale
Baseline and 6 months
Change from baseline to 6 months in anxiety symptoms as assessed by the Spanish version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
We will use the 7 items of the anxiety's subscale
Baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00061663

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Non-Intensive Intervention

3
Subscribe