Evaluating a Host-response Based Diagnostic for Distinguishing Between Bacterial and Viral Etiology in Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) (OBSERVER)

October 4, 2021 updated by: MeMed Diagnostics Ltd.

A Multi-center, Prospective, Validation Study to Assess the Accuracy of a Host-response Based Diagnostic for Distinguishing Between Bacterial and Viral Etiology in Adult Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

The purpose of this study is to validate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel host-response based diagnostic tool for differentiating between bacterial and viral etiologies in adult patients aged 18 years and older with clinical suspicion of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
583

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Israel
      • Haifa, Israel, 3109601
        • Rambam Health Care Campus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will include eligible patients aged 18 years and older of both genders that attend the emergency department or affiliated community clinics due to a suspected LRTI, or due to a non-infectious disease.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 years and older who agree (or their legal guardian agree) to sign an informed consent will be eligible for inclusion.

  • The LRTI cohorts should also fulfill the following criteria:

    • Peak measured (not tactile, self-reported acceptable) temperature ≥ 37.8°C (100°F) within the last 7 days (AND)
    • Symptoms duration ≤7 days (AND)
    • Clinical suspicion of LRTI or pneumonia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Oral/intravenous/intramuscular antibiotic treatment of over 48/12/12 hours' duration at time of enrollment (respectively), unless temperature ≥ 37.8°C was measured within the last 2 days
  • Another episode of an acute infection during the last 2 weeks
  • Congenital immune deficiency (CID)
  • A proven or suspected human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1, hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
  • Active malignancy
  • Pregnancy

  • Current treatment with immune-suppressive or immune-modulating therapies including without limitations:

    • Use of high dose steroids >1 mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent in the past two weeks
    • Monoclonal antibodies
    • Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)
    • Cyclosporine, Cyclophosphamide, Tacrolimus
    • Granulocyte/Monocyte colony stimulating factor (G/GM-CSF)
    • Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) agents
    • Interferon (of all kinds)

  • Other severe illnesses that affect life expectancy and quality of life such as:

    • Moderate to severe psychomotor retardation
    • Post-transplant patients (including solid organs, allogeneic/autologous stem cell transplantation)
    • Moderate to severe congenital metabolic disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
LRTI patients
Patients with suspicion of LRTI, excluding episodes of COPD exacerbations
Non-infectious patients
Afebrile patients with no apparent infectious disease
LRTI patients with COPD
Patients with suspicion of LRTI in a sub-group of patients with COPD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To externally validate the diagnostic accuracy of a host-response based diagnostic tool called ImmunoXpert™, for differentiating between bacterial and viral etiologies in adult patients aged 18 years and older with clinical suspicion of LRTI
Time Frame: 0-6 days after the initiation of symptoms
0-6 days after the initiation of symptoms

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of ImmunoXpert™ to currently available lab measures (WBC, ANC, PCT, CRP), using sensitivity and specificity measures and predetermined cutoffs
Time Frame: 0-6 days after the initiation of symptoms
0-6 days after the initiation of symptoms
To compare ImmunoXpert™ results with the physician suspected diagnosis at time of patient recruitment and compared to the reference standard diagnosis
Time Frame: 0-6 days after the initiation of symptoms
0-6 days after the initiation of symptoms
To estimate the potential improvement in health and economic outcomes following the usage of ImmunoXpert™ compared to current practice
Time Frame: 0-6 days after the initiation of symptoms
0-6 days after the initiation of symptoms
To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of ImmunoXpert™ in differentiating between infectious vs non-infectious patients
Time Frame: 0-6 days after the initiation of symptoms
0-6 days after the initiation of symptoms

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
MeMed Diagnostics Ltd.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Rambam Health Care Campus
Rabin Medical Center
European Commission
Carmel Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mical Paul, MD, Rambam Health Care Campus

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 10, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 4, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 4, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MM-1005-OB

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings