Study of the QOL Evaluation of Trelagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (TRENDS)

December 7, 2023 updated by: Takeda
The purpose of this study is to assess the reduction in treatment burden during 12 weeks of trelagliptin administration in patients with type 2 diabetes on diet and exercise therapy only.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to assess the reduction in treatment burden during 12 weeks of trelagliptin administration in patients with type 2 diabetes on diet and exercise therapy only. Eligible participants will be randomized to either the study drug (trelagliptin) group or the comparative drug (daily DPP-4 inhibitor) group. Treatment burden will be assessed using Diabetes Therapy Related -QOL (DTR-QOL) questionnaire and Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
219

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 16
    • Aichi
      • Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 17
      • Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 18
    • Gunma
      • Kanra, Gunma, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 25
    • Hyogo
      • Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 9
    • Ibaraki
      • Koga, Ibaraki, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 27
    • Kanagawa
      • Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 14
      • Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 11
      • Yamato, Kanagawa, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 10
    • Miyagi
      • Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 4
      • Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 5
    • Nara
      • Kashihara, Nara, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 3
    • Osaka
      • Kashiwara, Osaka, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 15
      • Suita, Osaka, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 1
    • Saitama
      • Okegawa, Saitama, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 24
    • Tochigi
      • Oyama, Tochigi, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 26
    • Tokyo
      • Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 23
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 6
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 7
      • Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 22
      • Musashino, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 19
      • Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 21
      • Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 12
      • Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 13
      • Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 20
      • Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 2
      • Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda Selected Site 8

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants diagnosed as type 2 diabetes.
  2. Participants with a stable diet and exercise therapy only for at least 12 weeks prior to the start of the screening period.
  3. Participants who require a DPP-4 inhibitor treatment.
  4. Participants with Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >=6.5 % and <10.0 % at the start of the screening period.
  5. Participants who completed DTR-QOL questionnaire at the start of the screening period.
  6. Participants who have received less than 2 types of medication for treatment of comorbidities (such as hypertension or dyslipidemia) at the start of the screening period (any number of daily doses).
  7. Participants who, in the opinion of the principal investigator or the investigator, are capable of understanding the content of the clinical study and complying with the study protocol requirements.
  8. Participants who can provide the written informed consent prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
  9. Participants aged >=20 years at the time of informed consent.
  10. Outpatient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants who are receiving any oral anti-diabetic medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes at the start of the screening period.
  2. Participants diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.
  3. Participants with severe renal impairment or renal failure (e.g., estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m^2 or on dialysis).
  4. Participants with serious heart disease or cerebrovascular disorder, or serious pancreatic, blood, or other disease.
  5. Participants with a history of gastrointestinal resection.
  6. Participant with a proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
  7. Participant with malignancy.
  8. Participants with a history of hypersensitivity or allergy to DPP-4 inhibitors.
  9. Pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the study period.
  10. Participants who may need to add or discontinue concomitant medication or change the dose during the study period.
  11. Participants who will require treatment with a prohibited concomitant medication during the study period.
  12. Participants participating in other clinical studies.
  13. Participants assessed ineligible in the study by the principal investigator or the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Trelagliptin
Trelagliptin 100 mg, orally, once weekly for up to 12 weeks. Trelagliptin 50 mg, orally, once weekly for up to 12 weeks in patients with moderate renal impairment.
Drug: Trelagliptin
Trelagliptin 100 mg or 50 mg
Active Comparator: Daily DPP-4 inhibitors
An inhibitor orally administered at the dosage and administration in the package inserts for each drug, for up to 12 weeks.
Drug: Daily DPP-4 inhibitor
Alogliptin, anagliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, teneligliptin or vildagliptin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the Diabetes Therapy Related -QOL (DTR-QOL) Questionnaire at the End of Study
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 1: Burden on Social Activities and Daily Activities] at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 2: Anxiety and Dissatisfaction With Treatments] at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 3: Hypoglycemia] at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 4: Satisfaction With Treatment] at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Questions About Treatment Satisfaction in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12 and the end of study (Week 12)
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level. Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks. Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences.
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12 and the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at the End of Study Stratified by the Use of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL. Reported data was the score stratified by the use of medication for treatment of comorbidities at baseline (Used/ Not used).
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Questions About Treatment Satisfaction in the DTSQ at the End of Study Stratified by the Use of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level. Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks. Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences. Reported data was the score stratified by the use of medication for treatment of comorbidities at baseline (Used/ Not used).
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at the End of Study Stratified by the Number of Daily Doses of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities (<2 Times or ≥2 Times) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Questions About Treatment Satisfaction in the DTSQ at the End of Study Stratified by the Number of Daily Doses of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities (<2 Times or ≥2 Times) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level. Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks. Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences.
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at the End of Study Stratified by the Total Number of Daily Tablets of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities (<2 Tablets or ≥2 Tablets) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Questions About Treatment Satisfaction in the DTSQ at the End of Study Stratified by the Total Number of Daily Tablets of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities (<2 Tablets or ≥2 Tablets) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level. Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks. Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences.
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at the End of Study Stratified by the Number of Doses of the Study Drug or Comparative Drug (Once Weekly, Once Daily or Twice Daily) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Questions About Treatment Satisfaction in the DTSQ at the End of Study Stratified by the Number of Doses of the Study Drug or Comparative Drug (Once Weekly, Once Daily or Twice Daily) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level. Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks. Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences.
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Score Per Question in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at the End of Study
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to end of study (Week 12)
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL. It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions). Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0). Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Baseline (Week 0), up to end of study (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Score Per Question in the the DTSQ at the End of Study
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to end of study (Week 12)
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level. Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks. Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences.
Baseline (Week 0), up to end of study (Week 12)
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Up to 12 weeks
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Up to 12 weeks
Duration of Hospitalization for Type 2 Diabetes (Excluding Educational Hospitalization Without Worsening of Diabetes)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The investigators checked any hospitalization of study participants for type 2 diabetes after the first administration of the study drug or comparative drug (excluding educational hospitalization without worsening of diabetes).
Up to 12 weeks
Number of Participants With Hospitalization for Type 2 Diabetes (Excluding Educational Hospitalization Without Worsening of Diabetes)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Up to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Takeda

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Study Director, Takeda

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 21, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 21, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2017

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 7, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Trelagliptin-4002
  • JapicCTI-173482 (Registry Identifier: JapicCTI)
  • U1111-1189-9256 (Registry Identifier: WHO)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available for all interventional studies after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received (or program is completely terminated), an opportunity for the primary publication of the research and final report development has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Trelagliptin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings