The Effect of OMT on Functional Outcomes and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers in Mild to Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury

June 22, 2020 updated by: Rebecca Wyatt, Michigan State University
Test the hypothesis that a certain set of osteopathic manipulation procedures preformed on patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury will result in accelerated rates of recovery assessed using vestibular function tests, quality of life questionnaires and measurements of the levels of anti-inflammatory metabolite and protein biomarkers in the blood and urine.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This project proposes to test the hypothesis that a certain set of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) procedures performed on patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) will result in accelerated rates of recovery as assessed using vestibular function tests, patient response on quality of life questionnaires, and measurements of the levels of anti-inflammatory metabolite and protein biomarkers in urine and blood. The OMT techniques, performed ensemble (as a set) and in sequence, will encompass: (a) soft tissue to the upper-mid thoracic spine; (b) soft tissue to the cervical spine; (c) suboccipital release; (d) condylar decompression; and (e) cranial venous sinus release. The key clinical outcome measures will include Neurocom Balance Manager assessments (Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance; Stability Evaluation Test; Rhythmic Weight Shift; Limits of Stability), Vestibular Oculomotor Screen, Motion Sensitivity Test, as well as questionnaires such as Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Dizziness Handicap Inventory, and the more general quality of life measures (dressing, bathing, medication management, etc. as assessed by the SF 36 QOL questionnaire).

A unique and trail blazing aspect of our proposed work is to screen for biochemical alterations in the plasma and urine of these patients following administration of OMT and to correlate these changes with vestibular function tests and other clinical parameters that may shed light on the biological mechanism(s) underlying the OMT. The impact of our proposed research lies in our attempt to establish a foundation for the basis of using OMT procedures to accelerate recovery of patients following mild to moderate brain injury and to find correlations between cognitive functions, biochemical markers, and self-reported assessments of quality of life.

The successful achievement of positive outcomes in this project will serve as the basis for our future efforts to seek funding from the National Institutes of Health for recruitment of larger numbers of subjects in a multi-center research effort.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
29

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Mason, Michigan, United States, 48854
        • Origami Brain Injury Rehabilitation Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury
  • Chief complaint of headache and/or dizziness
  • 18 years or older
  • Medically stable/free from acute infection or fever
  • Not a danger to self or others
  • Not actively engaged in substance abuse
  • Minimum Ranchos Los Amigos Level of 4 (http://www.traumaticbraininjury.com/symptoms-of-tbi/).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minors below age of 18
  • Any acute fracture or bleeding
  • Head, neck or back wounds that would prevent OMT treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Treatment groups
To recruit and organize patients with TBI enrolled in a standard rehabilitation program into three groups ((a) treatment group receiving OMT; (b) control group A receiving sham treatment; and (c) control group B receiving neither OMT nor sham treatment) in order to assess the feasibility and adherence to the protocol and determine participation and attrition rates in preparation for a larger study.
Other: Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
OMT techniques applied in the thoracic spine soft tissue, cervical spine soft tissue, suboccipital release, occipital condyle condylar decompression, and cranial venous sinus release.
Other Names:
  • OMT
OTHER: Effect of OMT on clinical outcome measures
Clinical outcome measures including Neurocom Balance Manager assessments (Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance; Stability Evaluation Test; Rhythmic Weight Shift; Limits of Stability), Vestibular Oculomotor Screen, Motion Sensitivity Test, as well as questionnaires such as the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Dizziness Handicap Inventory, and the more general quality of life measures (dressing; bathing; medication management, etc. as assessed by the SF 36 QOL questionnaire).
Other: Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
OMT techniques applied in the thoracic spine soft tissue, cervical spine soft tissue, suboccipital release, occipital condyle condylar decompression, and cranial venous sinus release.
Other Names:
  • OMT
NO_INTERVENTION: Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers
to analyze urine and plasma samples collected from the three groups of participants: urine and plasma samples one hour before, plasma samples one hour after and 48 hours after treatment for alterations in the levels of low molecular weight compounds or protein components to identify potential biomarkers that may correlate with the TBI condition and/or the OMT.
NO_INTERVENTION: Infrastructure development
to establish the infrastructure for the recording, management, and extraction of clinical data and to estimate effect sizes and variability in key outcome measures so that a larger, longer term study can be planned with sufficient statistical power to identify significant results.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Neurocom Balance Manager assessment in 12 weeks after OMT
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Participants will be evaluated prior to treatment on the Neurocom Balance Manager. Reassessment done at 12 week. The balance score will be recorded.
12 weeks
Change of baseline Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) scores after 12 weeks of OMT
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Participants will be given the HIT-6 questionnaire at 0 and12 weeks. The scores will be recorded.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Anti-inflammatory Biomarker after 12 weeks of OMT or sham treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Urine sample will be taken one hour prior to initial OMT or sham treatment and again at12 weeks. Plasma samples will be taken one hour prior to OMT/sham treatment and 48 hours after treatment this will be done at week 0, 6 and 12. The anti-inflammatory biomarkers will be recorded and compared (before/after treatment) to see if they levels decrease after OMT treatments
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Michigan State University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
American Osteopathic Association

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca Wyatt, DO, Assistant Professor at Michigan State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 18, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 29, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 22, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • i053814

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Headache

Clinical Trials on Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings