The Effect of OMT on Functional Outcomes and Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers in Mild to Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury

June 22, 2020 updated by: Rebecca Wyatt, Michigan State University
Test the hypothesis that a certain set of osteopathic manipulation procedures preformed on patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury will result in accelerated rates of recovery assessed using vestibular function tests, quality of life questionnaires and measurements of the levels of anti-inflammatory metabolite and protein biomarkers in the blood and urine.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This project proposes to test the hypothesis that a certain set of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) procedures performed on patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) will result in accelerated rates of recovery as assessed using vestibular function tests, patient response on quality of life questionnaires, and measurements of the levels of anti-inflammatory metabolite and protein biomarkers in urine and blood. The OMT techniques, performed ensemble (as a set) and in sequence, will encompass: (a) soft tissue to the upper-mid thoracic spine; (b) soft tissue to the cervical spine; (c) suboccipital release; (d) condylar decompression; and (e) cranial venous sinus release. The key clinical outcome measures will include Neurocom Balance Manager assessments (Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance; Stability Evaluation Test; Rhythmic Weight Shift; Limits of Stability), Vestibular Oculomotor Screen, Motion Sensitivity Test, as well as questionnaires such as Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Dizziness Handicap Inventory, and the more general quality of life measures (dressing, bathing, medication management, etc. as assessed by the SF 36 QOL questionnaire).

A unique and trail blazing aspect of our proposed work is to screen for biochemical alterations in the plasma and urine of these patients following administration of OMT and to correlate these changes with vestibular function tests and other clinical parameters that may shed light on the biological mechanism(s) underlying the OMT. The impact of our proposed research lies in our attempt to establish a foundation for the basis of using OMT procedures to accelerate recovery of patients following mild to moderate brain injury and to find correlations between cognitive functions, biochemical markers, and self-reported assessments of quality of life.

The successful achievement of positive outcomes in this project will serve as the basis for our future efforts to seek funding from the National Institutes of Health for recruitment of larger numbers of subjects in a multi-center research effort.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Mason, Michigan, United States, 48854
        • Origami Brain Injury Rehabilitation Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury
  • Chief complaint of headache and/or dizziness
  • 18 years or older
  • Medically stable/free from acute infection or fever
  • Not a danger to self or others
  • Not actively engaged in substance abuse
  • Minimum Ranchos Los Amigos Level of 4 (http://www.traumaticbraininjury.com/symptoms-of-tbi/).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minors below age of 18
  • Any acute fracture or bleeding
  • Head, neck or back wounds that would prevent OMT treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Treatment groups
To recruit and organize patients with TBI enrolled in a standard rehabilitation program into three groups ((a) treatment group receiving OMT; (b) control group A receiving sham treatment; and (c) control group B receiving neither OMT nor sham treatment) in order to assess the feasibility and adherence to the protocol and determine participation and attrition rates in preparation for a larger study.
OMT techniques applied in the thoracic spine soft tissue, cervical spine soft tissue, suboccipital release, occipital condyle condylar decompression, and cranial venous sinus release.
Other Names:
  • OMT
OTHER: Effect of OMT on clinical outcome measures
Clinical outcome measures including Neurocom Balance Manager assessments (Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance; Stability Evaluation Test; Rhythmic Weight Shift; Limits of Stability), Vestibular Oculomotor Screen, Motion Sensitivity Test, as well as questionnaires such as the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Dizziness Handicap Inventory, and the more general quality of life measures (dressing; bathing; medication management, etc. as assessed by the SF 36 QOL questionnaire).
OMT techniques applied in the thoracic spine soft tissue, cervical spine soft tissue, suboccipital release, occipital condyle condylar decompression, and cranial venous sinus release.
Other Names:
  • OMT
NO_INTERVENTION: Anti-inflammatory Biomarkers
to analyze urine and plasma samples collected from the three groups of participants: urine and plasma samples one hour before, plasma samples one hour after and 48 hours after treatment for alterations in the levels of low molecular weight compounds or protein components to identify potential biomarkers that may correlate with the TBI condition and/or the OMT.
NO_INTERVENTION: Infrastructure development
to establish the infrastructure for the recording, management, and extraction of clinical data and to estimate effect sizes and variability in key outcome measures so that a larger, longer term study can be planned with sufficient statistical power to identify significant results.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Neurocom Balance Manager assessment in 12 weeks after OMT
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Participants will be evaluated prior to treatment on the Neurocom Balance Manager. Reassessment done at 12 week. The balance score will be recorded.
12 weeks
Change of baseline Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) scores after 12 weeks of OMT
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Participants will be given the HIT-6 questionnaire at 0 and12 weeks. The scores will be recorded.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Anti-inflammatory Biomarker after 12 weeks of OMT or sham treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Urine sample will be taken one hour prior to initial OMT or sham treatment and again at12 weeks. Plasma samples will be taken one hour prior to OMT/sham treatment and 48 hours after treatment this will be done at week 0, 6 and 12. The anti-inflammatory biomarkers will be recorded and compared (before/after treatment) to see if they levels decrease after OMT treatments
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca Wyatt, DO, Assistant Professor at Michigan State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 18, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 29, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Headache

Clinical Trials on Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment

3
Subscribe