Intraneural Facilitation as a Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

September 6, 2019 updated by: Bryan Tsao, Loma Linda University
We hypothesize that a standard course of INF can result in significant improvement in CTS as measured by clinical, electrodiagnostic, or ultrasound measures.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

INF is a novel non-invasive therapy based on the principle of restoring vascular function at the capillary level in peripheral nerve. his therapy has been shown to improve clinical function in patients with diabetic-associated polyneuropathy, a model for various forms of ischemic neuropathy. CTS is a common condition where regional compression at the wrist results in ischemic focal demyelination of the distal median nerve. This results in sensory dysfunction, pain, and eventually axon loss and weakness if the compression is sufficiently severe and prolonged. Standard therapy for CTS includes wrist splints, regional lidocaine injections, ergonomic adjustments, various forms of occupation therapy, and ultimately surgical release of the carpal tunnel ligament. However, all of these are either temporary in their effect or invasive. The diagnosis of CTS relies on clinical, electrodiagnostic or NCS, and ultrasound methods.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
        • Loma Linda University Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 74 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients referred to the LLUH Neurology Electrodiagnostic Laboratory with electrodiagnostic and clinical evidence of CTS (uni- or bilateral)
  2. Ages >18 and < 75 (irrespective of gender)
  3. Current use of splints as long as the frequency of treatment is unaltered and onset of use is > 1 week in duration

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior carpal tunnel release > 2 years ago
  2. The presence of any condition that would prevent NCS from accurately diagnosing CTS (e.g., hereditary polyneuropathy or acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy)
  3. Workman's Compensation cases
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Undergoing conservative or surgical/injection therapy (physical or occupational therapy, injections)
  6. Clinically silent CTS in face of positive electrodiagnostic results
  7. Sufficiently severe clinical symptoms that warrant more aggressive therapy i.e., carpal injections or release
  8. Any confounding medical condition that the investigator deems may adversely affect subject participation or outcomes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Intraneural facilitation therapy
The intraneural facilitation intervention is a novel manual physical therapy approach with anecdotal evidence in neuropathic pain symptoms through biasing blood flow from an artery through the nutrient vessels into the epineurium of an accompanying nerve. The main concept of intraneural facilitation is the use of two manual holds. The first hold is called facilitation hold and includes putting the contralateral joint in a maximal loose-pack position that is comfortable to the patient. The hypothesis with this initial hold is the nerve will have greater excursion the accompanying artery and the nutrient vessels that are clustered at the joint will be stretched. This stretch may enlarge the opening at the junction of the artery and bridging nutrient vessel, therefore consistently creating a vascular bias into the neural epineurial capillaries. Theoretically, this creates increased epifascicular vascular pressure which may be absent due to epineurial ischemia.
Other: Intraneural facilitation (INF)
INF is a novel non-invasive therapy based on the principle of restoring vascular function at the capillary level in peripheral nerve.
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham therapy

Will be performed by a different therapist than actual INF. The patient will be asked to do the following combination of passive range of motion (PROM) and active ROM activities to promote blood flow in the affected arm Each visit will last about 45 minutes, twice a week for 6 weeks (total 12 sessions).

Missing > 4 sessions will invalidate subject outcomes.
Other: Sham INF
Will be performed by a different therapist than actual INF. The patient will be asked to do the following combination of passive range of motion (PROM) and active ROM activities to promote blood flow in the affected arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Boston CTS Questionnaire symptom severity scale and functional assessment.
Time Frame: change between baseline and one week after completion of INF therapy
composite measurement of carpal tunnel symptomology (pain and numbness) and functional assessment
change between baseline and one week after completion of INF therapy
The Boston CTS Questionnaire symptom severity scale and functional assessment.
Time Frame: change between week 1 and 3 months after completion of INF therapy
composite measurement of carpal tunnel symptomology (pain and numbness) and functional assessment
change between week 1 and 3 months after completion of INF therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: change between baseline and one week after completion of INF therapy
an ordinal standardized scale grading pain from 0 (absent) to 10 (greatest)
change between baseline and one week after completion of INF therapy
Visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: change between week 1 and 3 months after completion of INF therapy
an ordinal standardized scale grading pain from 0 (absent) to 10 (greatest)
change between week 1 and 3 months after completion of INF therapy
Ultrasound
Time Frame: change between baseline and one week after completion of INF therapy
Reduction in diameter of the median nerve at the wrist or in the distal forearm ratio
change between baseline and one week after completion of INF therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Loma Linda University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bryan Tsao, MD, Loma Linda University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 29, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 22, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 22, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 29, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 6, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 5170247

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Intraneural facilitation (INF)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings