Weight Bath Traction in Chronic Low Back Pain

Multicenter Investigation Weight Bath Traction in Chronic Lumbar Spine Pain: a Controlled, Randomiezd, Single Blind Follow-up Study

It is typical of chronic low back pain that, after the first painful episode, is repeated at 44-78% of patients. For acute lumbar pain, approx. 10-15% of them are converted into chronic. Conservative treatments are few studies done in the traction therapy. A large number of multicenter trials did not evaluate the effectiveness of underwater traction therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Goals are the followings:

  1. Is the beneficial effect of a weight bath comparable to a non-treated control group with respect to clinical parameters?
  2. How much does the quality of life change in an initial state and how much is it in comparison with the control group?

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

226

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Árpád Fejedelem Útja 7
      • Budapest, Árpád Fejedelem Útja 7, Hungary, 1027
        • Polyclinic of the Hospitaller Brothers of St. John of God,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients are selected from on the Outpatients clinics of the Department of Rheumatology and Physiotherapy of Polyclinic of the Hospitaller Brothers of St. John of God, Budapest

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 12 weeks of non-specific lymphatic pain,
  • the pain sensitivity of the paravertebral muscle and the painful movement of the lumbar spine can be observed, which can be characterized by segmental motion, segmental instability or other reasons
  • radiographically confirmed spondylosis, discopathy, and spondylarthrosis within one year.
  • back pain at least 30mm (100mm visualis analogue scale).
  • patients could not received systemic or locally administered steroid therapy, physiotherapy or they get balneotherapy in the last 2 months

    p- atient consent form signed before the start of test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria included previous lumbar spine surgery,
  • progressive neurologic loss,
  • pregnancy,
  • (umbilical, hiatal, inguinal) hernia,
  • malignities,
  • infectious diseases,
  • inflammatory pathologies,
  • severe pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases,
  • uncontrolled- hypertension,
  • mental disorders,
  • incontinence,
  • Acute lower back pain;
  • Organic neurological symptoms associated with the lower back;
  • pain in the background of osteoporosis or other causes of vertebral compression is likely
  • Lack of complience,
  • Pain due to inflammatory spinal disease;
  • spondylolisthesis (which is not greater than 25% of vertebral skeleton compared to adjacent vertebrae)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Receiving NSAID medication
Examination of the spinal mobilization in cm. The pain and quality of life assessment of functional status through questionnaires.
Receiving NSAID medication and weight bath therapy,
Examination of the spinal mobilization in cm. The pain and quality of life assessment of functional status through questionnaires.
Receiving weight bath therapy,
Examination of the spinal mobilization in cm. The pain and quality of life assessment of functional status through questionnaires.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
prove the hypothesis that weight bath traction has favorable effect. of LBP using the change in the clinical parameters.
Time Frame: at the first visit and After at the 3 and the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at the 3 and the 12 weeks after the treatment.Pain intensity was measured by using the Visual Analog Scale (0-100 mm). Patients recorded on the VAS scale the level of low back pain at rest as well as during activity.
at the first visit and After at the 3 and the 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary objective was to evaluate whether it also leads to the improvement in the quality of life.
Time Frame: at the first visit and After at the 3 and the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily life , the Functional disability by using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) .
at the first visit and After at the 3 and the 12 weeks
Secondary objective was to evaluate whether it also leads to the improvement in the quality of life.
Time Frame: at the first visit and After at the 3 and the 12 weeks
the EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D). A self administered questionnaire instrument for measuring generic health status (health-related quality of life).
at the first visit and After at the 3 and the 12 weeks
Secondary objective was to evaluate whether it also leads to the improvement in the movements of the lumbal spine.
Time Frame: at the first visit and After at the 3 and the 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in level improvements in the parameters of clinical lumbal spine movements in centimeters
at the first visit and After at the 3 and the 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tamas GATI, MD, Polyclinic of the Hospitaller Brothers of St. John of God,

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 21396-3/2017/EKU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on questionnaires

Search Similar Trials