Effect of a Vibratory Stimulus on Mitigating Nociception-specific Responses to Skin Puncture in Neonates

November 7, 2023 updated by: Lance M Relland, MD, PhD

Effect of a Vibratory Stimulus on the Mitigation of Nociception-specific Behavioral and Electroencephalographic Responses to Skin Puncture in Neonates: a Randomized Control Trial

The assessment and treatment of pain in neonates remains a challenge. In an effort to improve the quality of care while limiting opioid-related adverse effects, this study aims to determine the efficacy of a non-pharmacological intervention on the mitigation of nociception-specific responses to a skin breaking procedure in term and preterm neonates. Such responses will be measured using behavioral measures as well as with electroencephalography-based methods.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Eligible neonates who are 36-56 weeks post-menstrual age and who are scheduled to undergo a clinically required heel lance will be studied after obtaining appropriate verbal and written consent from the respective parents. Subjects will be monitored during a baseline resting state, during vibratory stimuli alone, and during a heel lance that is randomized to be preceded or not preceded by the vibratory stimulus. The sessions will include time-locked video recordings and electroencephalography using a specialized net of 128 electrodes (Electrical Geodesics Inc., EGI; Eugene, OR). Behavioral and cortical responses will be then be analyzed in a blinded fashion to determine the efficacy of the vibratory intervention, as well as to validate what behavioral responses are most correlated with nociception-specific cortical activity.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
134

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43205
        • Nationwide Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

8 months to 1 year (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Neonatal Intensive Care Unit patient
  • Between 36 to 56 weeks post-menstrual age
  • Medically stable
  • Due to have a clinically required bedside heel stick as part of their routine care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Congenital anomalies or abnormalities affecting the brain
  • Patient is over 4 months corrected age
  • Infants who receive analgesics or sedatives within 72 hours prior to assessment
  • Administration of maternal analgesics or sedatives to which the infant may be exposed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: No vibratory stimulus before or during heel lance
Baseline measurements and readings after vibration alone will be done, but no vibratory stimulus will be provided immediately preceding or during heel lance.
Experimental: Vibratory stimulus before and during heel lance
Baseline measurements and readings after vibration alone will be done, as well as a vibratory stimulus that will be provided immediately preceding and during heel lance.
Device: Baby GentleStick
The Baby GentleStick is a handheld device that fits and provides vibration to an Owen Mumford Unistik3 Dual lancet. The gentle vibration occurs at 178 Hertz with a free-hanging 0.24 mm range of motion. The device may provide vibration alone and also allow for simultaneous vibration and deployment of the lancet.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Nociception-specific Brain Activity
Time Frame: EEG-based responses are very brief, so the relevant assessment window is 350-700 ms after stimulus
Electroencephalography (EEG)-based measurements will be done to detect changes in nociception-specific cortical activity. Recordings will be done using a high-density array of 128 electrodes embedded in soft sponges (Electrical Geodesics, Inc. (EGI); Eugene, Oregon, USA) soaked in warm saline and applied to the infant's head to record event-related potentials (ERPs) with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz, filters set to 0.1-400 Hz. As per published protocols, the midline Cz electrode will be used as the reference. Previous studies have also determined the EEG-based nociception-specific response to occur 350-700 ms after the stimulus. Changes in the amplitude of the signal during this time frame is the primary outcome measure.
EEG-based responses are very brief, so the relevant assessment window is 350-700 ms after stimulus

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Facial Expression
Time Frame: Assessment of facial expression is done based on video clips that are synchronized with the ERP window of 350-700ms after stimulus
Components from the Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS) use facial actions to monitor pain in newborn infants. Facial actions that occur each score 1 point, while those that do not occur each score 0 points (better outcome). This study applied 7 facial actions and may therefore score between 0 and 7. A higher score (worse outcome) is interpreted as a higher pain intensity. Comparison of median scores between groups will determine the effect of the intervention, which should result in a lower score to represent mitigation of pain.
Assessment of facial expression is done based on video clips that are synchronized with the ERP window of 350-700ms after stimulus

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Lance M Relland, MD, PhD

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lance Relland, MD, PhD, Nationwide Children's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 13, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 23, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 23, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 6, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 7, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB18-00779

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain Management

Clinical Trials on Baby GentleStick

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings