Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effect on Pain Threshold and Working Memory: Impact of Age and Protocol Type

March 30, 2020 updated by: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effect on Pain Threshold and Working Memory in Healthy Adolescents, Young Adults and Elderly: a Randomized , Cross-over, Single Blind Trial

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation method which has great potential as an aid in the therapeutic management of neuropsychiatric disorders and chronic pain syndromes. However, despite promising results, the response to stimulation presents great variability among subjects. Age is a factor that is known to influence the tDCS effect forging the inconsistency of clinical effect.The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of tDCS on pain perception and working memory in healthy women from 3 different age groups: adolescents, young adults and elderly. This is a randomized, single-blinded, cross-over study of 2 different active interventions and sham.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation method that has great potential as an aid in the therapeutic management of neuropsychiatric disorders and chronic pain syndromes. tDCS modulates the neuronal membrane potential , facilitating neuronal depolarization or hyperpolarization, hence modifying the cortical excitability of the stimulated area. However, despite promising results the response to stimulation presents great variability among subjects. Chronological age is an important factor in the variation of brain plasticity. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is associated with cognitive and emotional aspects of pain, in addition to being related to executive components of working memory. Anodal tDCS on DLPFC modulates pain level in patients with chronic pain and modifies working memory performance in healthy subjects and patients with memory impairment. The prefrontal cortex presents a great structural difference throughout lifespan: it is under maturational process in the adolescence, reaching peak of maturation in the adult life, and initiating process of cerebral senescence in elderly subjects. Therefore, the use of tDCS on DLPFC in these three age groups presents potential for a large variation in response. Faced with the potential of tDCS for adjuvant use in the treatment of several diseases, it is imperative to understand the variability of this intervention between different age groups. This knowledge may allow the optimization of neuromodulation protocols, allowing more careful and refined use in the clinic. The study primary outcomes is the difference between and within age groups on the variation of pre and post tDCS on pain threshold evaluated by Heath pain threshold on a Quantitative sensory testing paradigm and working memory performance evaluated by n-back test in healthy subjects of three age groups: adolescents, young adults, elderly. This is a randomized, single blinded, cross-over, sham-controlled clinical trial. The study will be conducted at the Clinical Research Center of the Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre (HCPA). It will include 30 women, 10 women by age group: adolescents between 15 and 16 years,young adults between 30 and 40 years old and elderly women between 60 and 70 years. Participants will be randomized for a cross-over of three sessions: anodal stimulation in DLPFC, anodal stimulation in primary motor cortex (M1) as active control and sham stimulation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil, 90035-003
        • Hospital de Clinicas e Porto Alegre (HCPA)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 15 to 16 years for the adolescent group
  • Age between 30 to 40 years for the young adult group
  • Age between 60 to 70 years for the elderly group
  • From completed elementary school to incomplete superior education
  • right handed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Current smoker or previous smoker within 10 years
  • Current Substance Use Disorder
  • Neurological condition (e.g., traumatic brain injury, stroke, brain tumor, epilepsy, brain surgery, brain implant)
  • Any diagnosed Psychiatric condition (e.g., Attention deficit/hyperactivity deficit (ADHD), bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder)
  • Use of any antidepressive or psychoactive, psychostimulant medication
  • Any chronic pain condition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Anodal tDCS on DLPFC
Participants will receive anodal tDCS on the left DLPFC for 30 mins duration, cathode will be placed over the right supra orbital area. The electrodes are 25cm², The stimulation current is 2 milliamperes (2mA).
Device: Anodal tDCS on DLPFC
Participants will receive anodal tDCS on the left DLPFC for 30 min duration, cathode will be placed over the right supra orbital area. The electrodes are 25cm², The stimulation current is 2 milliamperes (2mA).
Other Names:
  • DLPFC
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Anodal tDCS on M1
Participants will receive anodal tDCS on the left M1 for 30 min duration, cathode will be placed over the right supra orbital area. The electrodes are 25cm², The stimulation current is 2 milliamperes (2mA).
Device: Anodal tDCS on M1
Participants will receive anodal tDCS on the left M1 for 30 min duration, cathode will be placed over the right supra orbital area. The electrodes are 25cm², The stimulation current is 2 milliamperes (2mA).
Other Names:
  • M1
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Sham tDCS
Participants will receive sham tDCS. The anode will be placed on the left DLPFC and the cathode on the over the right supra orbital area. The electrodes are 25cm², There will be a ram up and down of 30 seconds each, after the ramp up the current will be turned off.
Device: Sham tDCS
Participants will receive sham tDCS. The anode will be placed on the left DLPFC and the cathode on the over the right supra orbital area. The electrodes are 25cm², There will be a ram up and down of 30 seconds each, after the ramp up the current will be turned off.
Other Names:
  • Sham

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heat pain Threshold
Time Frame: percentual change from before the tDCS onset, to immediately after the end of tDCS application for each cross-over session
Using the Quantitative sensory testing, this measure consists of the average temperature of 3 stimulus with increasing magnitude of heat where the participant presses a button to indicate when he/she first perceives pain.
percentual change from before the tDCS onset, to immediately after the end of tDCS application for each cross-over session
Working memory performance
Time Frame: up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset
Working memory performance will be evaluated by a computerized n-back test associated with flankers at baseline and after each session of active tDCS (DLPFC or M1) or sham. The measure of performance is the D' discrimination index (calculated based on hit rate and false alarm rate).
up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inhibitory control performance
Time Frame: up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset
A computerized stop-signal task associated with flankers will evaluate inhibitory control. Performance index are calculated with the D' discrimination index (based on hits and false alarms for go and stop trials). The task will be performed at baseline and after the stimulation on each cross-over session.
up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset
Area under the curve of the ERP during inhibitory control task
Time Frame: up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset
Area under the curve of the signal of event-related potential (ERP) evoked during the stop signal task with flankers (inhibitory control performance). The signal will be assessed using an 8 channel EEG device at baseline and after each cross-over session.
up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset
Heat thermal threshold
Time Frame: percentual change from before the tDCS onset, to immediately after the end of tDCS application for each cross-over session
Using the Quantitative sensory testing, this measure consists of the average temperature of 3 stimulus with increasing magnitude of heat where the participant presses a button to indicate when he/she first perceives heat.
percentual change from before the tDCS onset, to immediately after the end of tDCS application for each cross-over session
Heat pain tolerance
Time Frame: percentual change from before the tDCS onset, to immediately after the end of tDCS application for each cross-over session
Using the Quantitative sensory testing, this measure consists of the temperature for a stimulus with increasing magnitude of heat where the participant presses a button to indicate the maximum heat tolerated.
percentual change from before the tDCS onset, to immediately after the end of tDCS application for each cross-over session
Moderate pain
Time Frame: percentual change from before the tDCS onset, to immediately after the end of tDCS application for each cross-over session
Using the Quantitative sensory testing, this measure consists of the average temperature of 3 stimulus with increasing magnitude of heat where the participant presses a button to indicate pain perceived at a moderate level, i.e. level of 6 in a numeric pain scale (0 to 10).
percentual change from before the tDCS onset, to immediately after the end of tDCS application for each cross-over session
Unpleasantness sensation
Time Frame: percentual change from before the tDCS onset, to immediately after the end of tDCS application for each cross-over session
This measure will be assessed using a numeric pain scale (0 to 10 in which 0 represents no unpleasant sensation and 10 extremely unpleasant sensation) with which participant will indicate how unpleasant was the temperature of the quantitative sensory testing stimulus for the heat pain threshold.
percentual change from before the tDCS onset, to immediately after the end of tDCS application for each cross-over session
Alpha wave power
Time Frame: up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset
Assessment of alpha wave power (8Hz to 12Hz) will be done using an 8 channel EEG device during an "eyes-open and eyes-closed" paradigm where participant is in a resting state at baseline and after each cross-over session.
up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset
Beta wave power
Time Frame: up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset
Assessment of beta wave power (12Hz to 25Hz) will be done using an 8 channel EEG device during an "eyes-open and eyes-closed" paradigm where participant is in a resting state at baseline and after each cross-over session.
up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset
Theta wave power
Time Frame: up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset
Assessment of theta wave power (4Hz to 8Hz) will be done using an 8 channel EEG device during an "eyes-open and eyes-closed" paradigm where participant is in a resting state at baseline and after each cross-over session.
up to 60 minutes after tDCS onset
serum BDNF levels
Time Frame: up to 60 minutes before tDCS onset
Neuroplasticity biomarker will be assessed using serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) at baseline to be correlated with tdcs effects on primary outcomes
up to 60 minutes before tDCS onset

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 28, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 31, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017-0188 (IRB ID)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared with coded variables and coded participant numbers, only to editors and reviewers of journals where the studies are submitted and registered and under formal request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Available in August 2019; Available for 3 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

by e-mail, under request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Anodal tDCS on DLPFC

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings