Predictors of Probabilistic Selection Task Performance

July 26, 2021 updated by: Luca Aquili, Charles Darwin University

Modulation of Probabilistic Selection Task Performance Based on Anodal tDCS of dlPFC, Eye Blink Rate, Extraversion and Impulsiveness

The project aims to investigate whether tDCS has an effect on reward and punishment learning sensitivity. Further, whether tDCS will modulate extraversion and impulsivity personality traits, and eye-blink-rate's effect on learning. For instance, trait extroversion in past research is linked to the dopamine neurotransmitter system, where it is thought that extreme low and high levels are detrimental to cognitive performance. Since tDCS has been shown to increase dopamine levels, it is thought that people who are already high in dopamine may experience less benefit (or even impairment) on cognitive performance following tDCS.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a non-invasive, low intensity and risk, brain stimulation technique known as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the way people learn in a computer administered cognitive task. This will be achieved by comparing participants' performance on this task after receiving placebo 'sham' tDCS in one experimental session, and real 'treatment' tDCS in another experimental session. Neither the researcher administering the session or the participant will be aware of which form of tDCS is being used. Previous research indicates that tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex brain region stimulates the release of a chemical neurotransmitter, dopamine, that is linked to reward and punishment processing, and implicated in conditions such as addiction and Parkinson's disease.

The computerized cognitive learning task presents participants with pairs of six different symbols and asks them to choose one of these. In the first half of the task, participants receive visual feedback (correct or incorrect; +$0.10 or -$0.10) and the symbols are preprogrammed to be rewarded or punished for. In the second part of the task, participants are tested on the same task but do not receive feedback.

Further, the effect of participants' personality characteristics (specifically extraversion and impulsivity), as well as eye-blink-rate, on cognitive learning performance will be investigated, as this is known to be influenced by tDCS. Past research suggests that people may respond differently to tDCS based on individual differences in these personality traits, that are linked at a brain circuits level. Participants will be assessed on extraversion and impulsivity personality traits using pen and paper, self-report questionnaires. Similarly, eye-blink-rate is linked to the aforementioned brain neurotransmitter, dopamine, and will be assessed by manually counting of blinks in a video recording of the participant focusing on a stationary point.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Northern Territory
      • Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, 0810
        • Recruiting
        • Charles Darwin University, College of Health & Human Sciences
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Either male or female
  • You are aged between 18 and 50 years
  • You are in good health
  • You agree to fast 3 hours prior to testing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suffer from cardiac, hepatic, renal, and/or neurological disorders
  • Have damaged or diseased skin on your face and scalp, or a sensitive scalp
  • Have a history of alcohol or drug addiction, or severe psychiatric illness
  • Are receiving drug treatment which may lower seizure threshold (i.e. epilepsy)
  • Are pregnant
  • Are sleep deprived (less than 6 hours a day)
  • Have metallic dental fillings, orthodontic appliances, a cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant, and/or surgical clips
  • Have a history of migraine or headaches

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: tDCS sham
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) in sham mode.
Predictors of Probabilistic Selection Task Performance including anodal tDCS of dlPFC, eye blink rate, extraversion and impulsiveness
Active Comparator: tDCS anodal
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) in anodal/excitatory mode.
Predictors of Probabilistic Selection Task Performance including anodal tDCS of dlPFC, eye blink rate, extraversion and impulsiveness

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Probabilistic Selection Task (PST) performance from pre tDCS to post tDCS
Time Frame: PST is tested prior to tDCS administration at time 0 (baseline) and following tDCS (approximately 50 minutes into the experiment) for both tDCS sham and tDCS anodal
Accuracy (%) and reaction times on the above task
PST is tested prior to tDCS administration at time 0 (baseline) and following tDCS (approximately 50 minutes into the experiment) for both tDCS sham and tDCS anodal

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 22, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 22, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CDULA2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Learning; Lack of (Specific)

Clinical Trials on Effects of tDCS of dlPFC on Probabilistic Selection Task

3
Subscribe