Use of Physiology to Evaluate Procedural Result After PCI CTO (ULTRA-CTO)

February 15, 2025 updated by: Maarten van Leeuwen, Isala

ULTRA-CTO is a prospective multicentre non-randomised investigator-initiated trial designed to enrol 200 subjects with an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occluded (CTO) coronary artery.

The main objective of the study is to assess the predictive value of post-PCI resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) with regard to Fractional flow reserve (SSR) in CTO patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

ULTRA-CTO is a prospective multicentre non-randomised investigator-initiated trial designed to enrol 200 subjects with an indication for PCI CTO.

The main objective of the study is to evaluate both the value of post-PCI RFR and post-PCI FFR for detecting suboptimal stent result (SSR).

After angiographically successful CTO PCI, intra-coronary physiologic assessment (RFR, FFR, coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR)) of the CTO vessel will be performed. Additional OCT will be performed directly or during a staged procedure within 4 ± 2 weeks when indicated (i.e. high contrast use, procedural duration, major dissection or other safety reasons according to the operator).

When intra-coronary physiologic assessment or OCT is not possible at all, the patients will not be included in the study.

When the operator decides to optimize the stent result (post-dilation or additional stenting), based on the OCT and/or physiology, post-PCI RFR and FFR should be repeated. For patients undergoing a clinically indicated FFR of a remaining intermediate stenosis (angiographically 30-90%) in a non-CTO vessel or major side branch of the CTO vessel within 4 weeks after the index procedure, intra-coronary physiologic assessment (RFR, FFR, CFR and IMR) will be repeated in the CTO vessel for exploratory objectives

At 4 ± 2 weeks follow-up, the occurrence of cardiovascular events and clinical classification will be assessed for secondary objectives

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
      • Zwolle, Netherlands, 8025 AB
        • Recruiting
        • Isala
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Maarten Van Leeuwen, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tom Meijers, MD, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years and older.
  2. Angiographically successful PCI CTO without any remaining lesion at least 30% proximal to the stented segment.
  3. Possibility to perform physiologic measurements and OCT of sufficient quality.
  4. Patients willing and capable to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

1) Contra-indication for adenosine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Post-PCI intra-coronary physiological and OCT measurements
After angiographically successful CTO PCI, intra-coronary physiologic assessment (RFR, FFR, CFR and IMR) and OCT of the CTO vessel will be performed directly. OCT may als be performed during a staged procedure within 4 ± 2 weeks after the index procedure when clinically indicated.
Diagnostic test: post-PCI Pd/Pa
After angiographically successful CTO PCI, intra-coronary physiologic assessment (RFR, FFR, CFR and IMR) and subsequent OCT of the CTO vessel will be performed. OCT may also be performed during a staged procedure when clinically indicated.
Other Names:
  • Post-PCI RFR
  • Post-PCI CFR
  • Post-PCI IMR
  • Post-PCI FFR
  • Post-PCI OCT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The AUC of post-PCI RFR compared to the AUC of post-PCI FFR with regard to SSR.
Time Frame: Index procedure (or staged procedure if indicated).
The AUC of post-PCI RFR compared to the AUC of post-PCI FFR with regard to SSR.
Index procedure (or staged procedure if indicated).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) score at follow-up
Time Frame: 4± 2 weeks
Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) score at follow-up
4± 2 weeks
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification at follow-up
Time Frame: 4± 2 weeks
New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (I, II, III or IV) at follow-up
4± 2 weeks
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification at follow-up
Time Frame: 4± 2 weeks
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification (I, II, III, IV) at follow-up
4± 2 weeks
Occurrence of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and any coronary revascularization (MACE) at follow-up
Time Frame: 4± 2 weeks
Occurrence of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and any coronary revascularization (MACE) at follow-up
4± 2 weeks
The predictive value of the RFR and FFR gradient across the stented segment with regard to SSR in CTO patients.
Time Frame: Index procedure (or staged procedure if indicated).
The predictive value of the RFR and FFR gradient across the stented segment with regard to SSR in CTO patients.
Index procedure (or staged procedure if indicated).
The correlation between positive RFR (≤0.89) and positive FFR (≤0.80) with regard to SSR following angiographically satisfactory CTO PCI.
Time Frame: Index procedure (or staged procedure if indicated).
The correlation between positive RFR (≤0.89) and positive FFR (≤0.80) with regard to SSR following angiographically satisfactory CTO PCI.
Index procedure (or staged procedure if indicated).
The correlation between post-PCI physiology (OCT, RFR, FFR, CFR, IMR) and suboptimal stent result (SSR) with anginal complaints (SAQ score), NYHA and CCS classification and MACE at follow-up
Time Frame: Index procedure (or staged procedure if indicated) until 4± 2 weeks follow-up
The correlation between post-PCI physiology (OCT, RFR, FFR, CFR, IMR) and suboptimal stent result (SSR) with anginal complaints (SAQ score), NYHA and CCS classification and MACE at follow-up.
Index procedure (or staged procedure if indicated) until 4± 2 weeks follow-up
The impact on physician-decision making based on OCT and physiology findings
Time Frame: Index procedure (or staged procedure if indicated).
The impact on physician-decision making based on OCT and physiology findings
Index procedure (or staged procedure if indicated).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Isala

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Abbott

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Maarten Van Leeuwen, PhD, Isala Zwolle

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 15, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 9346

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous Coronary Revascularisation

Clinical Trials on post-PCI Pd/Pa

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings