MCG is Clinically Applied to Evaluate Myocardial Ischemic Function in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

June 2, 2024 updated by: Nanhai Hospital, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

The Clinical Application of Magnetocardiography (MCG) as a Non-invasive Diagnostic Tool for Evaluating Myocardial Ischemic Function in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

The objective of this observational study is to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of magnetocardiography (MCG) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) and compare it with coronary CTA (CCTA). Additionally, the study aims to determine the most suitable diagnostic index for MCG. The primary question it seeks to address is whether MCG or MCG combined with CCTA can be utilized to guide the clinical application of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary heart disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

  1. Patients aged≥18 years with stable coronary artery disease (CCTA stenosis 30%-90%) underwent sequential examinations of MCG and CCTA. The results of CCTA were assessed using CT-FFR, and the diagnostic effectiveness of MCG in evaluating myocardial ischemia was analyzed using CT-FFR as the reference standard. Simultaneously, MCG was compared to CCTA to determine the clinical value of MCG in the functional evaluation of myocardial ischemia.
  2. Coronary angiography was performed in patients who met the criteria for the procedure, and revascularization was carried out based on the intraoperative situation. Patients who underwent revascularization were followed up for 1 year, with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as the endpoint. The clinical value of MCG in guiding the treatment of patients with SCAD was evaluated by reviewing the proportion of coronary angiography, revascularization, and MACE in the enrolled patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
291

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Foshan, Guangdong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Nanhai Hospital, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with suspected stable coronary artery disease were enrolled in a consecutive group at Nanhai Hospital of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years old.
  2. Stable coronary artery disease patients with a coronary CTA stenosis degree of 30% to 90%.
  3. Sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome.
  2. Patients diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
  3. Patients diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy.
  4. Patients with complex arrhythmias, such as frequent atrial premature beats, ventricular premature beats, and complete bundle branch block.
  5. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%.
  6. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, kidney failure, or other serious diseases.
  7. Pregnant women.
  8. Patients with an allergy to contrast agents.
  9. The study subjects who have metal grafts that interfere with magnetic cardiogram examination.
  10. The study subjects who are unable to cooperate with magnetocardiogram examination and CTA.
  11. Patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting.
  12. There are significant artifacts present in coronary CTA.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Consistency in comparing MCG and CT-FFR
Time Frame: 1 year
Initially, MCG was conducted on each patient to assess the extent of myocardial ischemia using magnetic field distribution, pseudo-current density distribution, magnetic field intensity time spectrum line, and magnetic couple parameters. Simultaneously, the CT-FFR cut-off value of 0.8 was employed as the benchmark for this study. The agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive value of cardiac ischemia were compared between MCG and CT-FFR.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
Time Frame: 1 year
Firstly, we performed coronary angiography in the above patients who met the indications of coronary angiography and performed revascularization according to the intraoperative conditions. The revascularized patients were then followed up for 1 year with major adverse cardiovascular events as the endpoint. By reviewing the ratio of coronary angiography, revascularization, and incidence of MACE in enrolled patients, the value of MCG in guiding the clinical treatment of patients with stable coronary disease was evaluated.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanhai Hospital, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 19, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 2, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GJishen

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings