Role of Endothelial Function in SCI CVD Risk

August 19, 2024 updated by: Craig Hospital

Role of Vascular Endothelial Function After Spinal Cord Injury Related Cardiovascular Disease Risk

Individuals with spinal cord injury have heart attacks and strokes more frequently, and much earlier in life. People with spinal cord injuries develop plaque in vessels much faster, and the reasons why are unclear. Doctors generally attributed the increased risk with weight gain and developing diabetes, but many studies have shown that even without these common factors, plaque in vessels is developing more often and faster. Endothelial cells are a single layer of cells that line all vessels in the body and plays an important role in vessel health. Damage to endothelial cells is known to lead to heart attacks and strokes. Past studies on endothelial cells of people with spinal cord injury have been unclear. The investigators have new data that these cells are unhealthy after spinal cord injury a measurement. This includes measuring endothelial health by directly altering its function using a catheter in the arm and measuring small particles in blood called endothelial microvesicles. If the project is successful, the investigators will learn important information on the health of endothelial cells after spinal cord injury. The investigators will also be able to use these markers of endothelial cell function to create treatments to improve vessel health and prevent heart attacks and strokes later in life in people with spinal cord injury.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) demonstrate accelerated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) occurring ~4 fold more often, and decades earlier in life. Importantly, atherosclerosis has been detected in people with SCI independent of traditional risk factors, much earlier in life, and appear recalcitrant to conventional risk mitigating inventions such as exercise and diet. Also, as disease is silent, many individuals are not screened for this atherosclerotic burden and only aware after the major vascular event of a myocardial infarction or stroke. The mechanisms which drive early ASCVD is unknown. Endothelial cell dysfunction precedes radiographic or angiographic evidence of atherosclerosis, and plays a central role in the development, progression and severity of atherosclerotic vascular disease. While it has been suggested that SCI results in compromised endothelial health, there is little empirical data on the degree or scope of impairment as well as mechanisms underlying any potential impairment. Endothelial dysfunction may be an important factor underlying the increased risk and prevalence of ASCVD and associated events in adults with SCI and a viable target for therapeutic intervention. Preliminary data suggests primary endothelial cell impairment related to its vasodilator function and provide potential mechanisms related to oxidative stress burden. The investigators also present the potential of endothelial cell derived microvesicles as a biomarker and mediator of endothelial cell dysfunction. The aim of this proposal is to determine whether endothelial function is impaired in adults with SCI. Our hypothesis is that endothelium-dependent vasodilation is impaired in adults with SCI and oxidative stress and endothelial cell derived microvesicles contribute to this dysfunction. Results supporting this hypothesis will: 1) provide mechanistic insight into the excess risk of ASCVD in adults with SCI; 2) identify therapeutic targets for reducing cardiovascular risk in this population; and 3) provide scientific rationale for vascular-related treatment clinical trials aimed at improving vascular health and reducing cardiovascular risk in individuals with SCI.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80113
        • Recruiting
        • Craig Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andrew Park, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christopher DeSouza, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Brian Stauffer, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men and women of all races, ethnic backgrounds, over the age of 18 years with history chronic motor complete paraplegia, but free of overt chronic diseases assessed by clinically documented medical history, physical examination, and blood chemistries and hematological evaluation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women of all races, ethnic backgrounds>18 years of age
  • Traumatic spinal cord injury (Sports, Assault, Transport, Fall, Other Traumatic Causes)
  • Time since injury (> 12 months)
  • Paraplegia Motor Complete Injury (neurological level of injury at T2 or below, ASIA Impairment Scale A or B

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of high blood pressure
  • History cardiovascular disease (coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident).
  • History high cholesterol
  • History of Diabetes Type I or Type II
  • History of Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • History of Chronic Kidney or Liver Disease
  • History of Cancer
  • History of Autoimmune Disease (Thyroid Disease, Lupus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, etc).
  • History of smoking tobacco in the last 12 months
  • History of alcohol use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Spinal Cord Injury
Men and women of all races, ethnic backgrounds, over the age of 18 years: adults with chronic (>12 months), motor complete (AIS A/B) SCI with paraplegia (neurological level of injury [NLI] at T2 or below).
Procedure: Brachial intra-arterial infusion of vasoactive and antioxidant drugs (acetylcholine, nitroprusside, ascorbic acid)
The brachial artery in the non-dominant arm will be catheterized to infuse endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine, endothelium-independent vasodilator nitroprusside, and antioxidant ascorbic acid at concentrations to have isolated effect in the forearm.
Procedure: venous occlusion plethysmography
Whole forearm blood flow will be measured by mercury-strain gauge while venous occlusion is applied to the forearm and hand by rapid-cuff inflation to sub-arterial pressures. Changes in whole forearm blood flow with be measured at baseline, endothelial agonists, and removal of oxidative stress via acorbic acid.
Drug: Acetylcholine
Endothelium-dependent vasodilation will then be assessed by changes in FBF in response to intra-arterial infusions of the endothelial agonist acetylcholine infused at rates of 4.0, 8.0, 16.0 μg/100 mL of forearm tissue/min to generate a dose-response curve.
Drug: Sodium Nitroprusside
Endothelium-independent vasodilation will be assessed by changes in forearm blood flow in response to intra-arterial infusions of sodium nitroprusside at 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 μg/100 mL forearm tissue/min.
Drug: Ascorbic acid
Ascorbic acid will be infused at a constant rate (12 mg/100 mL tissue/min) and maintained at the same rate while the acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside dose-response curves are repeated.
Procedure: venous phlebotomy
Venous blood samples will be collected to measure baseline cardiometabolic characteristics and isolate endothelial cell microvesicles for characterizations and in vitro experiments.
Control (Non-Spinal Cord Injury)
Non-injured men and women of all races, ethnic backgrounds, over the age of 18 years.
Procedure: Brachial intra-arterial infusion of vasoactive and antioxidant drugs (acetylcholine, nitroprusside, ascorbic acid)
The brachial artery in the non-dominant arm will be catheterized to infuse endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine, endothelium-independent vasodilator nitroprusside, and antioxidant ascorbic acid at concentrations to have isolated effect in the forearm.
Procedure: venous occlusion plethysmography
Whole forearm blood flow will be measured by mercury-strain gauge while venous occlusion is applied to the forearm and hand by rapid-cuff inflation to sub-arterial pressures. Changes in whole forearm blood flow with be measured at baseline, endothelial agonists, and removal of oxidative stress via acorbic acid.
Drug: Acetylcholine
Endothelium-dependent vasodilation will then be assessed by changes in FBF in response to intra-arterial infusions of the endothelial agonist acetylcholine infused at rates of 4.0, 8.0, 16.0 μg/100 mL of forearm tissue/min to generate a dose-response curve.
Drug: Sodium Nitroprusside
Endothelium-independent vasodilation will be assessed by changes in forearm blood flow in response to intra-arterial infusions of sodium nitroprusside at 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 μg/100 mL forearm tissue/min.
Drug: Ascorbic acid
Ascorbic acid will be infused at a constant rate (12 mg/100 mL tissue/min) and maintained at the same rate while the acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside dose-response curves are repeated.
Procedure: venous phlebotomy
Venous blood samples will be collected to measure baseline cardiometabolic characteristics and isolate endothelial cell microvesicles for characterizations and in vitro experiments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Endothelium-dependent vasodilation
Time Frame: Measured at baseline (without acetylcholine) and immediately after each acetylcholine dose for 3-5 minutes.
Total forearm blood flow with be measured by strain gauge venous plethysmography under baseline conditions and under pharmacological manipulation with acetylcholine at increasing concentrations (8, 16, 32ug/ml).
Measured at baseline (without acetylcholine) and immediately after each acetylcholine dose for 3-5 minutes.
Endothelium-independent vasodilation
Time Frame: Measured at baseline (without sodium nitroprusside) and immediately after each sodium nitroprusside dose for 3-5 minutes.
Total forearm blood flow with be measured by strain gauge venous plethysmography under baseline conditions and under pharmacological manipulation with sodium nitroprusside at increasing concentrations (1, 2, 4ug/ml).
Measured at baseline (without sodium nitroprusside) and immediately after each sodium nitroprusside dose for 3-5 minutes.
Endothelial cell-derived microvesicles concentration
Time Frame: Baseline
Endothelial cell-derived microvesicles will be collected from venous blood samples and counted used flow cytometry to determine a circulating concentration.
Baseline
Association of Endothelial cell-derived microvesicles to Endothelium-dependent vasodilation
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Endothelial cell-derived microvesicles effects of human coronary artery endothelial cells nitric oxide bioavailability
Time Frame: Baseline
Endothelial cell-derived microvesicles will be sorted and collected by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) flow cytometry. The endothelial cell-derived microvesicles will be co-cultured with human coronary artery endothelial cells. Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase and phosphorylation sites of interest will be measured by intracellular protein expression quantification of whole cell lysates by capillary electrophoresis immunoassays. Nitric oxide production will be assessed by total nitric oxide and nitrate/nitrite parameter assays.
Baseline
Endothelial cell-derived microvesicles effects of human coronary artery endothelial cells reactive oxygen species and antioxidant capacity
Time Frame: Baseline
Endothelial cell-derived microvesicles will be sorted and collected by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) flow cytometry. The endothelial cell-derived microvesicles will be co-cultured with human coronary artery endothelial cells. Super oxide dismutase and catalase expression will be measured by intracellular protein expression quantification of whole cell lysates by capillary electrophoresis immunoassays. Intracellular oxidative stress will be assessed by ROS-Glo H2O2 assay.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Craig Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Colorado, Boulder

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Park, MD, Craig Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 19, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016729-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data sharing will be facilitated through active participation in Open Data Commons for SCI (ODC-SCI). ODC-SCI is a cloud-based community-governed repository to store, share, and publish research data on Spinal Cord Injury and is compliant with requirements for FAIR and trustworthy repositories established by NIH.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings