FLIPPED CLASSROOM METHODS COMBINED WITH PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING ON NURSING STUDENTS
INVESTIGATING THE EFFECT OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM METHODS COMBINED WITH PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING ON NURSING STUDENTS' KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES REGARDING PATIENT SAFETY
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
One of these qualities is the fundamental responsibility of nurses to ensure patient safety. It is estimated that 421 million hospitalizations occur every year in the world. Approximately 7.42 million adverse events occur during these hospitalizations, and patient harm is the 14th leading cause of global mortality. Many universities are looking for teaching methods that can improve students' clinical decision-making abilities and self-directed learning in order to provide safe and quality nursing care. Lack of patient safety knowledge is one of the educational problems of nursing students leading to unsafe practices.Early education on patient safety is crucial in preparing nurses to be competent in patient care. Therefore, offering patient safety education courses at the undergraduate level using an innovative approach is important to improve patient safety and quality in nursing care.
Various innovative approaches are used in nursing education to improve students' critical thinking and problem-solving skills. These include team-based learning, concept mapping, case studies and problem-based learning (PBL) and flipped classroom model. In the flipped classroom model, students are presented with course materials prior to class and then class time is spent gaining in-depth understanding through interactive activities. Studies have shown that the flipped classroom model improves students' academic performance and satisfaction. However, compared to traditional lecture-based classes, reverse classes have been reported to be more effective in improving academic performance and course evaluation as well as developing engagement and higher-order thinking skills in nursing students. Problem-based learning (PBL), one of the important teaching methods that improve nursing students' clinical performance and critical thinking skills, can be used as an in-class activity in flipped classrooms. However, some studies indicate that the simple implementation of PBL instruction can challenge students' systematic understanding of the required knowledge and that this model is more difficult for students with low learning ability and performance, resulting in learning fatigue and worse learning outcomes than expected. Several studies have explored the combined use of reverse classrooms and PBL in nursing education. However, it is important to investigate how to maximize the impact of pre-course self-study to promote the development of students' abilities. Therefore, this study aims to determine the effect of patient safety education provided by combining the flipped classroom model with problem-based learning within the scope of nursing management course on nursing students' patient safety knowledge, attitudes and perceptions.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antalya, Turkey
- Akdeniz University Kumluca Faculty of Health Science
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 2024-2025 Academic Year Fall Semester enrolled in the Nursing Management Lesson,
- agreed to participate in the study
- completed the data collection forms completely
Exclusion Criteria:
- want to leave the research at any time of the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Didactic Group
In the first week of the clinical practice, the control group students were given patient safety training by the researcher using the classical didactic method on the same day and time as the intervention group students.
After the training, a case test was applied to the students.
|
|
|
Experimental: Flipped Group
In the first week of the clinical practice, the E-learning module prepared by the researchers within the scope of the flipped education method was shared with the intervention group students and all students were shown in a conference room.
After the training, PBL modules (different cases related to patient safety for each group) were shared with the students divided into groups of 3-5 students within the scope of PBL and they were given one week to prepare.
In the other weeks of the clinical practice, face-to-face case discussions were held with the groups.
These case discussions lasted an average of 40 minutes.
|
In the first week of the clinical practice, the E-learning module prepared by the researchers within the scope of the flipped education method was shared with the intervention group students and all students were shown in a conference room.
After the training, PBL modules (different cases related to patient safety for each group) were shared with the students divided into groups of 3-5 students within the scope of PBL and they were given one week to prepare.
In the other weeks of the clinical practice, face-to-face case discussions were held with the groups.
These case discussions lasted an average of 40 minutes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Socio-demographic Characteristics Form
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The socio-demographic characteristics form prepared by the researchers consisted of four questions: age, gender, the status of receiving training on medical errors and patient safety outside the curriculum, and the source of the training.
|
Baseline
|
|
H-PEPSS TR
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after the intervention
|
The H-PEPSS TR is a 23-item, two-level measurement tool.
It consists of two main dimensions: "Classroom" and "Clinical environment".
The scale consists of six sub-dimensions.
Item total score averages are used in the whole scale and sub-dimensions.
Each item of the scale is evaluated as "Strongly disagree-1 point" and "Strongly agree-5 points" on a five-point.
The higher the score obtained from the "classroom" dimension and sub-dimensions of the scale, the higher the participants' perceptions of patient safety knowledge developed in the classroom environment.The higher the score obtained from the "clinical environment" dimension and sub-dimensions of the scale, the higher the participants' perceptions of patient safety competence developed in the clinical environment.
|
Baseline and 4 weeks after the intervention
|
|
Patient Safety Competency Self-Assessment Tool
Time Frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after the intervention
|
Item total score averages are used in the total scale and sub-dimensions.
The minimum score that can be obtained from the scale and sub-dimensions is 1 and the maximum score is 5. Higher mean scores indicate that students have better knowledge, skills and attitudinal competencies in patient safety.
Since the instrument is a multidimensional scale, the mean scores of the total scale, 3 dimensions and 12 factors are evaluated separately.
Each item of the scale is evaluated in a five-point Likert scale with different expressions in each dimension; The knowledge dimension consists of 2 factors and 6 items in total.
Its evaluation is as "1=I have no knowledge at all, 5=I know very well".
The skills dimension consists of a total of 6 factors and 21 items.
Its evaluation is as "1=I cannot do it at all, 5=I can do it very easily".
Attitude dimension consists of 4 factors and 14 items.
The evaluation is "1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree".
|
Baseline and 4 weeks after the intervention
|
|
Case Test and Open-Ended Question
Time Frame: 4 weeks after the intervention
|
A 20-question patient safety events test and two open-ended case questions (cause of error, risks, influencing factors, developing strategies for prevention, incident reporting and root causes) were created by the researchers and administered as a test. The test was evaluated out of 100 points. This is an evalution test exam, the minimum point is 65 for success. |
4 weeks after the intervention
|
|
PBL Modules
Time Frame: 4 weeks after the intervention
|
Modules were prepared by the researchers. The cases and questions in the case test were structured as PBL cases to compare the module content assessments. In PBL modules, students were asked to conduct root cause analysis on reported medical error scenarios. In this analysis, module work including the cause of the error, risks, influencing factors, suggestions for prevention, extraction of the root causes of the event, etc. was carried out. In the evaluation of each group, points were given according to the 100-point system. Case test results were evaluated as correct answers. PBL cases were scored on the realization of the implementation steps. This is an evaluation exam and 65 point for be success. |
4 weeks after the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- TBAEK-701
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.