Study of Acid Reflux in Asthma

The Study of Acid Reflux in Asthma

The purpose of this study is to determine if subjects with symptomatic asthma who are assigned to treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drug such as Nexium have fewer asthma attacks than similar subjects assigned to placebo treatment.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Lung Diseases; Lung Diseases, Obstructive; Asthma
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Esomeprazole; Drug: Placebo proton pump inhibitor

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND:

Gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) is frequent in asthmatics with poor asthma control, often occurs without symptoms, and can induce bronchoconstriction. Poorly controlled asthmatics are often treated for GERD with drugs that suppress gastric acid, but this treatment is expensive and the benefit of such treatment is not established. Proton pump inhibitors are a relatively new class of medications that provide highly effective treatment for GERD and associated problems. This success has led many doctors to begin PPI treatment in their asthma patients in an attempt to achieve better asthma control.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The randomized, placebo-controlled trial will enroll 400 asthmatics, ages 18 or older, who have poor asthma control on inhaled steroids, defined on the basis of excessive bronchodilator use, nocturnal awakenings, or frequent exacerbations. Participants will be randomly assigned to treatment with either a proton pump inhibitor, esomeprazole (Nexium) 40 mg twice a day, or matching placebo. The presence, severity, and temporal relationship of GERD to asthma symptoms will be documented with 24 hour ambulatory esophageal potential Hydrogen (pH) probe monitoring, but participants will be enrolled irrespective of the severity of GERD. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of participants who have exacerbations of asthma within a 6-month period defined by asthma diaries and interviews. Secondary outcome measures include asthma symptom and control scores, asthma-specific and generic health-related quality of life, GERD symptoms, health care use, pulmonary function, and airways reactivity. Pre-specified subgroup analyses will be conducted to determine if there are clinical or demographic characteristics that predict benefit from treatment of GERD in asthma.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 403
• Phase: Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Alabama
    • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
      • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • California
    • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
      • University of California, San Diego
  • Colorado
    • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80206
      • National Jewish Medical and Research Center
  • Florida
    • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
      • Nemours Childrens Clinic
    • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
      • University of Miami
  • Georgia
    • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
      • Emory University
  • Illinois
    • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
      • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
  • Indiana
    • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
      • Indiana University ACRC
  • Louisiana
    • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
      • LSUHSC Pulmonary Critical Care
  • Minnesota
    • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
      • University of Minnesota
  • Missouri
    • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108
      • Univ of MO Kansas City School of Medicine
    • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63310-1093
      • Washington University School of Medicine
  • New York
    • New Hyde Park, New York, United States, 11040
      • North Shore-LIJ Medical Center
    • New York, New York, United States, 10016
      • NYU School of Medicine
    • Valhalla, New York, United States, 10595
      • New York Medical College
  • North Carolina
    • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
      • Duke University
  • Ohio
    • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
      • Ohio State University
  • Pennsylvania
    • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
      • Thomas Jefferson Hospital Pulmonary Lab
  • Texas
    • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030-3411
      • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Vermont
    • Colchester, Vermont, United States, 05446
      • Northern New England Consortium

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• The general goal of patient selection is to enroll patients for whom asthma physicians might prescribe GERD treatment, but where there is uncertainty whether it might be effective.
• Age 18 or older
• Physician diagnosed asthma
• If amount of air expired in the first second during a forced expiratory maneuver (FEV1) is greater than or equal to 70% predicted normal pre-bronchodilator: demonstrate methacholine 20% from post-diluent baseline (PC20). PC20 less than 16 mg/ml during Visit 1
• If FEV1 less than 70% and greater than or equal to 50% predicted normal pre-bronchodilator: demonstrate 12% reversibility during Visit 1 or within past 12 months
• Currently on stable dose of daily inhaled steroids for asthma control, i.e., inhaled corticosteroid equivalent to 400 ug/day of fluticasone44 or greater for 8 weeks or longer
• Poor asthma control: Either of the following; a score of 1.5 or greater on the Juniper Asthma Control Questionnaire; two or more episodes of asthma symptoms in the past 12 months with each episode requiring at least one of the following: an emergency department visit, unscheduled physician visit, prednisone course, hospitalization
• Non-smoker for 6 months or longer
• Less than 10 pack/year smoking history

Exclusion Criteria:

• Surgery: Previous anti-reflux or peptic ulcer surgery
• Pulmonary function: FEV1 less than 50% predicted normal pre-bronchodilator
• GERD Symptoms: Severe reflux constituting a clinical indication for treatment with a PPI or H2 blocker, typically two or more episodes per week of heartburn requiring antacids
• Other major chronic illnesses; conditions which in the judgment of the Study Physician would interfere with participation in the study, e.g., non-skin cancer, endocrine disease, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, severe hypertension, Type 1 insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, renal failure, liver disorders, immunodeficiency states, major neuropsychiatric disorder
• Medication use: Anti-reflux medication (proton pump inhibitors or H2 blockers) within 1 month Theophylline, azoles, iron, anti-coagulants, insulin (for Type I diabetes), digitalis, any investigative drugs within 1 month
• Drug allergy: Previous adverse effects from proton pump inhibitors or methacholine challenge
• Females of childbearing potential: Pregnant or lactating, unwilling to practice an adequate birth control method (abstinence, combination barrier and spermicide, or hormonal)
• Inability or unwillingness to provide consent
• Inability to perform baseline measurements
• Completion of less than 10 of the last 14 days of screening period diary entry
• Inability to be contacted by telephone
• Intention to move out of the area within 6 months

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Quadruple

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Esomeprazole; Proton pump inhibitor of gastric acid	Drug: Esomeprazole; Proton pump inhibitor 40 mg orally twice daily; Other Names: Nexium
Placebo Comparator: Placebo for esomeprazoe; Placebo	Drug: Placebo proton pump inhibitor; Placebo proton pump inhibitor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Episodes of Poor Asthma Control (EPAC) From Diary Cards, According to Definition That Did Not Include Use of Beta-agonists as a Criterion	Episodes of poor asthma control was defined as any one of the following: 2 consecutive days with a drop in peak flow >=30% of baseline; urgent care for asthma; or new use of oral corticosteroids for asthma	Baseline to 24 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Exacerbation Components: >=30% Drop in Peak Expiratory Flow on 2 Consecutive Days		Baseline to 24 Weeks
Exacerbation Components: Urgent Care Visit		Measured at Month 6
Exacerbation Components: New Use of Oral Corticosteroids		Baseline to 24 Weeks
Asthma Episodes, According to Definition That Included Increased Use of Beta-agonists		Baseline to 24 Weeks
Use of Rescue Medications	Increase in the use of rescue meds by 4 or more uses on a particular day above the average uses during the run-in period.	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Night Awakening	Rate of awakening at night because of asthma symptoms	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Pulmonary Function: Change in Prebronchodilator FEV1	Mean change in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 - forced expiratory volume in 1 second; a measure of pulmonary function. The treatment effect is the difference in the mean change in between the groups.	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Pulmonary Function: Change in Prebronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity	Pulmonary function measured by mean change in Prebronchodilator forced vital capacity from baseline to 24 weeks	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Pulmonary Function: Change in Peak Flow Rate	Mean change from baseline to 24 weeks in the peak flow rate - how forceful patient can blow out air	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Pulmonary Function: Change in PC20	Mean Change in the dose of methacholine that results in a 20% drop in FEV1	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Juniper Asthma Control Score(JACQ)	Mean change. Scores on the JACQ range from 0 to 6, with lower scores indicating better asthma control and 0.5 as the minimal clinically important difference.	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI)	Mean change. Scores on the ASUI range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating less severe asthma.	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ)	Mean change. Scores on the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mini-AQLQ)range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and 0.5 as the minimal clinically important difference.	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Score Quality of Life Score: Physical Component	Mean change. Scores on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 range from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and 5 as the minimal clinically important difference.	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Quality of Life Score: Mental Component	Mean change. Scores on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 range from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and 5 as the minimal clinically important difference.	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Gastric Symptoms: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale Score	Mean change. The Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale score ranges from 0 to 3, with lower numbers indicating less distress.	Baseline to 24 Weeks
Change in Number of Gastric Symptoms: No. of Symptoms	Mean change	Baseline to 24 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
• Collaborators: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Robert Wise, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Bime C, Wei CY, Holbrook JT, Sockrider MM, Revicki DA, Wise RA. Asthma symptom utility index: reliability, validity, responsiveness, and the minimal important difference in adult asthmatic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Nov;130(5):1078-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.058. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
• Bime C, Wei CY, Holbrook J, Smith LJ, Wise RA. Association of dietary soy genistein intake with lung function and asthma control: a post-hoc analysis of patients enrolled in a prospective multicentre clinical trial. Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Dec;21(4):398-404. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00073.
• DiMango E, Holbrook JT, Simpson E, Reibman J, Richter J, Narula S, Prusakowski N, Mastronarde JG, Wise RA; American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers. Effects of asymptomatic proximal and distal gastroesophageal reflux on asthma severity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov 1;180(9):809-16. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200904-0625OC. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
• American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers, Mastronarde JG, Anthonisen NR, Castro M, Holbrook JT, Leone FT, Teague WG, Wise RA. Efficacy of esomeprazole for treatment of poorly controlled asthma. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 9;360(15):1487-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806290.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: September 1, 2003
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 1, 2008
• Study Completion (Actual): May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 1, 2003
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 2, 2003
• First Posted (Estimate): October 3, 2003

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): December 19, 2012
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 17, 2012
• Last Verified: December 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Respiratory Tract Diseases; Immune System Diseases; Hypersensitivity, Immediate; Bronchial Diseases; Respiratory Hypersensitivity; Hypersensitivity; Lung Diseases; Lung Diseases, Obstructive; Asthma; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Enzyme Inhibitors; Gastrointestinal Agents; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Esomeprazole; Proton Pump Inhibitors
• Other Study ID Numbers: 157; U01HL072968 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)